(Old stuff deleted. See page history.)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

That does look better, thanks! Trivialist ( talk) 22:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Hiya! Sorry to be slow in getting to this - I like the changes that you made to this article, and it now reads considerably less like an advertisement for the publication. Nice work! Cheers, Person man345 ( talk) 05:31, 15 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Fantastic! I'm going to take down the template then. On to the next. Thanks! Amphytrite ( talk) 17:42, 15 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi @ Amphytrite:, thanks so much for all your contributions!

I have created a personal user award to recognize contributions related to ancient Roman history, which I have dubbed "The Barnstar of Tacitus". Could you check my translation: "stella horreorum Taciti"? Thanks. Informata ob Iniquitatum ( talk) 21:38, 7 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Don Shirley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Green Book ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:38, 9 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stepping (African-American), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coachella ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 17:26, 10 June 2019 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on File:Bwgettysburg2.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs ( talk) 13:06, 20 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thicketty Mountain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cherokee County ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 14:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

You asked if the external link to Pizza, A Love Story met the criteria for WP:EL. I have reviewed those guidelines and provided answers below.

What to link

There are several things that should be considered when adding an external link.

Is the site content accessible to the reader? (Yes, entire documentary is available for free online streaming.)

Is the site content proper in the context of the article (useful, tasteful, informative, factual, etc.)? (Yes, it provides a quite thorough history of New Haven pizza.)

Is the link functioning and likely to remain functional? (Yes, for the foreseeable future--how long do movie websites typically last?)

If this is acceptable, I would like to restore the link. Or would it be better to use the documentary as a reference? Goustien ( talk) 02:10, 17 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The file File:Bwgettysburg2.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Low quality. Unencyclopedic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Minorax^{«¦ talk¦»} 12:36, 15 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The file File:Bwgettysburg2a.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Low quality. Unencyclopedic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Minorax^{«¦ talk¦»} 12:36, 15 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Highly recommend speedy delete for this. I've saved a personal copy and Wikipedia has no need for this file. Amphytrite ( talk) 00:42, 16 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Frankly I thought it had already been deleted back in 2019... no time like the present! Amphytrite ( talk) 00:43, 16 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The article The Nighttime Clap has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable series; lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources, failing WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 09:01, 2 August 2022 (UTC) reply