This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

	Archives 2010–2022:
	2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014–2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023

Hi! Somehow I missed the initial notification for your review, apologies. I can have it done by the end of this week (05/01). Would that be OK with you? Flavinista ( talk) 19:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi, just popping by to let you know that I have reviewed the article you nominated and it is now on hold pending any responses/changes. Feel free to leave any comments or make changes and I will review the article again next week. I'll be happy to extend the usual 7 day deadline a little if you require more time. From Hill To Shore ( talk) 11:53, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Category:Language and literature in Anglo-Saxon England, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 13:49, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created, List of works by David Hodgson, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.   I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  ( talk to me) ( My edits) @ 15:43, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Revelations of Divine Love, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mystic ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:20, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the history of the scientific method, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 13:33, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Hiya Amitchell125, I hope you're doing great! I was wondering, if you have the time and will, could you possibly review a GA-nominated article or two of mine? [1] Thanks in advance. -- HistoryofIran ( talk) 00:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

We keep this. Everything in medicine is potentially very controversial. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 21:51, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

April–May 2020 GAN Backlog Drive As you have taken part in previous GAN Backlog drives, or are a prolific GAN reviewer, you might be interested to know that the April–May 2020 GAN Backlog Drive starts on April 1, and will continue until the end of May.

Harrias ^talk 06:43, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Julian of Norwich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corpus Christi College ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:35, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Revelations of Divine Love you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique ( talk) 19:20, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

In this 2012 edit to Igor Stravinsky, you inserted a reference to "Keller 2011". Despite my best efforts, I have been unable to locate this source. Do you remember what this source was? I suspect it was something written by Hans Keller. ---  C& C ( Coffeeandcrumbs) 12:41, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	For your help on [Adriana Ocampo]'s article! Thank you so much for all your work and patience. Flavinista ( talk) 13:28, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

		The Vanstar
		For your GA review of Elektron (satellite program). Neopeius ( talk) 01:15, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Basic physics of the violin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fulcrum ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Amitchell125, Can you help me. Can you review Satyanatha Tirtha article, I've added GA tag to talk page of it, Thanks - MRRaja001 ( talk) 10:42, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

@Amitchell125, I have changed the sentence of PPGKK in Biography please check and confirm. Thanks.- MRRaja001 ( talk) 19:26, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yucatan squirrel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raptor ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:47, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Amitchell125, Is there any way to request change the Class of Article to B or C. For example if we take articles like this Foreign Secretary of India, the article is rated by default Stub but it's not a stub. Is there anyway that we can fix this, Thanks. - MRRaja001 ( talk) 09:46, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

@ MRRaja001:, it has to be done like this: go the Talk Page of an article and edit the Wikiproject information (e.g. 'WikiProject Rabbits|importance=mid|class=stub' can be changed to 'WikiProject Rabbits|importance=mid|class=B'). Above 'B' it's not so simple, see Wikipedia:Content assessment#Assessing articles for more information. Hope this helps. Amitchell125 ( talk) 11:26, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Okay, Thanks - MRRaja001 ( talk) 16:16, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Amitchell125, can you close this discussion [2] of redirect of Satyanatha Yati to Satyanatha Tirtha. You are the right person to conclude the discussion since you have reviewed the article and made it GA. - MRRaja001 ( talk) 03:42, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Amitchell125, please close this discussion. Someone commented please rply to them. Thanks - MRRaja001 ( talk) 05:30, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

The article Revelations of Divine Love you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Revelations of Divine Love for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique ( talk) 14:02, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much for reviewing my GAN nom – I greatly appreciate it! I had meant to address your last remaining comment, and have added two sentences to the lead post-GA pass: "During his time in office, he endeavoured to repair the Order's relations with the Vatican. These had become strained when his predecessor was controversially forced out by the Pope. Dalla Torre's three-year-long incumbency came to an end when died of throat cancer in 2020." Cheers! — Bloom6132 ( talk) 08:41, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Violin acoustics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aza24 -- Aza24 ( talk) 02:20, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

The article Violin acoustics you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Violin acoustics for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aza24 -- Aza24 ( talk) 00:20, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

The article Violin acoustics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Violin acoustics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aza24 -- Aza24 ( talk) 21:41, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

FYI, I left a note asking Iridescent if he'd be willing to take a look. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 13:25, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alberht of East Anglia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias ( talk) 19:01, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		Thank you for completing 15 reviews in the April–May 2020 GAN Backlog drive. Your work helped us to reduce the backlog by over 60%. Regards, Harrias talk 07:10, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

The article Alberht of East Anglia you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Alberht of East Anglia for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias ( talk) 20:41, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

The article Alberht of East Anglia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Alberht of East Anglia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias ( talk) 09:02, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Amitchell125. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " List of works by David Hodgson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 16:05, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your very constructive review of Muhammad al-Qunawi and your various improvements and copyedits to the article! HaEr48 ( talk) 21:34, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ealdwulf of East Anglia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ælfwald.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello Amitchel125,

I see that you removed a blog link from the Textus Roffensis page on August 10th. I added it after a discussion on blog posts, reliability and amount of detail with Bruce1ee, as described in the change notes. Could you please read and reply why you consider it to be an unworthy addition? It was a plain-text transcription of the first few folios of Textus Roffensis that contain the Law of Æthelberht.

Thank you, HuckRightOff ( talk) 14:41, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

@ HuckRightOff: I'm afraid you're up against Wikipedia's policy on user-generated content, "Content from websites whose content is largely user-generated is generally unacceptable." If you are an established and published expert, then the page may be acceptable to use, but there would need to be reliable information on the page about the sources used (see WP:BLOGS for where I am coming from). Hope this helps. Amitchell125 ( talk) 15:01, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

From your review of Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy @ GA review talk page: The article now has tags, as the lead section is not an adequate summary of the article; in places it is too technical and difficult to read and the prose needs to be copy edited.

@ Amitchell125: thank you for your careful reading of Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy and for your suggestions for improvements. This was a fun experience for me, and my little experiment on how wikipedia works and breathes. I wrote the article for who I was some 15 years ago - a grad student overwhelmed with real physics. This article is about a very narrow subfield of condensed matter physics, and I doubt it can be made any more accessible to general readers (no link?). I hope that in another 13 years (I'm referring to 2007 Talk - Suggestions for improvement someone else will give it a try. I understand that for most people this article will be incomprehensible, but then - how likely are they to end up reading the article to begin with? I am writing to complain about the straw man you put on top of the article - that big frame with a red exclamation mark. I've been removing those recently from other articles. The last one I removed was put there in 2010. I don't think they serve any purpose but to scare off people, saying that some things with the article are possibly wrong, but not saying that many are also right. Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy was a stub for 13+ years; I don't think the red exclamation mark is, all of a sudden, going to attract all those many experts in the field. I am not saying everything is alright with the article, I am sure many things are not. I also don't really care how it's going to be classified. I was hoping the review would make it better, and it did. It does makes me sad that out of 23ooo articles listed at Physics only 166 are good articles. Of those, at least 50% are biographies, the rest is history of science/physics, and few high-level, mostly classical phenomena. Some say Quantum electrodynamics is a really good good article, but then: short lead? terms and concepts beyond the understanding of most readers? How about Representation theory of the Lorentz group: short lead? terms and concepts? too technical template on top? How about Dirac delta function? Antimetric electrical network? Negative resistance: formulas in the lead? too many images? Should all physics and maths articles start with "here be dragons" exclamation marks? Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy was copy-edited (more or less successfully) on my request just two months ago. That huge frame on top of the article now asks for another copy-edit. Wouldn't it be better to let the article evolve like all other wikipedia articles? Is that template really necessary? This is the only article that I've ever seen have it. I'm reading in MOS:LEADLENGTH that "the length of the lead should conform to readers' expectations of a short, but useful and complete, summary of the topic". Short. Summary. Of the topic. The topic in Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy is not ARPES instrumentation (I do write about it, but it's in the article because it can't be found in published sources-especially not with all those pictures-and because it's fun to read). The topic is what ARPES can do in condensed matter physics. The lead is saying what ARPES is, and what it can do, skipping the hows. I believe this is enough. It was enough in those few other good articles above. In short, the three templates (will) serve no purpose and should not be on top of Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy or, if you ask me, any other wikipedia article (many thousands deserve it and do not have it). Regards, Ponor ( talk) 05:47, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

@ Ponor:I agree and sympathise with many of your comments, in particular about the dearth of good physics articles on Wikipedia. Instead of looking at other articles for comparison, I would stick to Wikipedia's advice and polices about lead sections, images, etc.. The article will be a difficult read no matter how well written it is, which makes the quality of the lead section crucially important, as it's the only part most readers will look at. The diagram at the top, the prose, the completeness, everything has to be OK.

I flagged up the article at the top to attract other experienced editors—the template causes the article to be listed elsewhere as being in need of attention. See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests#Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy for a message left by me for other copy editors.

I am an editor with a physics background (see Violin acoustics, which I got to GA if you're interested, but I enjoy history more these days). I am thus able to help to address the issues highlighted at the top of the article, and I'm with you on being keen for the 'straw man' to disappear! Best wishes, Amitchell125 ( talk) 12:52, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

@ Amitchell125:thank you for your response. I'm sure there will be rules and policies around for every point you wish to make. MOS itself seems to have two advice (not rules) about the lead, of which you cite "(lead should be written) in such a way that it can stand on its own as a concise version of the article”, the other being closer to what seemed to apply to other good articles I mentioned above: "The lead should stand on its own as a concise overview of the article's topic". So there are some double standards here. It would be great to have other editors attracted to my article. But they would get attracted (never happened, though) even if the templates were in the article's talk page. So I guess this ugly box will be polluting the article for many years to come; it's a punishment solely by its appearance. The article was copy-edited by the very Guild of Copy Editors editor (there are only four or five of them active, and no one specialized in STEM) just two months ago. I could try guessing what you think are the article's weak points, but without you pointing finger to the exact paragraphs and sentences, and with no feedback when I make changes, this would go forever. Without being more specific, your addition of these templates could be considered violation of a policy I found (smiley): "You should put an explanation on the talk page with comments on why you believe it is too technical, or suggestions for improvement. Templates added without explanation are likely to be either ignored or removed." (I think your explanations are just too broad, and I don't see any good examples around) Physics students would understand the lead, and they are the most likely readers of the article. How are we going to evaluate "the effort should still be made to make the article as understandable to as many as possible", is that 100, 1k or 1M readers? As for the other good articles I mentioned, do you think we should add a "too technical" template to them as well? Why this one, why not those? Don't get me wrong, I am not angry, I'm only perplexed. Best wishes, Ponor ( talk) 13:54, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

@ Ponor: OK, I'll get started on the article. In a month or less, I'm sure with your help (and hopefully that of others) it can be renominated. I'll 'ping' you if I need your help, etc., as your expertise is invaluable here. I'll take a look at the lead section first, with a view to getting it to GA level. Regards, Amitchell125 ( talk) 14:06, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Awesome, thank you! Meet you there. Ponor ( talk) 07:33, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

@ Ponor: The messages at the top are now gone, the copy editing is not yet finished though, so there's a message at the top of the Theory section ('Here be dragons"...) Getting there slowly. Amitchell125 ( talk) 19:57, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for picking up the Great Gold Robbery at GAN. I’ve changed my mind on this one for now; can you withdraw or close the nom for me? Cheers - SchroCat ( talk) 21:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello  Lizzy150, SandyGeorgia, Ceoil, and Aza24: just to let you know Edward Thomas Daniell is an FAC again. Thanks for your help and support in the past. Amitchell125 ( talk) 08:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thank you so much helping me making Divya Bharti GA. Not always have received such level of help. Really appreciate. You deserve equal credit for the accomplishment as well. Thanks again. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  ☣✅ 17:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Adding to your praise: Thank you for your diplomacy in the case which should by about joy and delight, see also what I just wrote before , asked about being well. Francis and I have different style, see Jesu, meine Freude and Vom Himmel hoch, and two painters rarely make one good picture ;) - The song is one of my songs for survival, or I would just let go. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:44, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

I see you wrote about violin, - see my talk for Anna Tifu today]. So happy I heard her! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:46, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

I took A long break from wikipedia, so I was not able to work on Saturn V. I'm going to work on it very soon and I will ping you then. Best, Signed, The4lines |||| ^{( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.)} 15:13, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Amitchell125, I've recently nominated the article Denys Page for GA status. I thought you did great work on the R. A. B. Mynors GA review and, since this article is on a very similar topic, I was wondering whether you might want to review this one as well. Best Modussiccandi ( talk) 14:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Congratulations, a credit and very well deserved. Ceoil ( talk) 20:07, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

		The Featured Article Medal
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears, and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild ( talk) 14:20, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

		The University Barnstar
		Thank you very much for helping to get the articles of two great scholars, R. A. B. Mynors and Denys Page, to GA status. Your review of Mynors really helped me get the hang of the GA criteria. Hoping to work with you again soon. Thanks again and regards, Modussiccandi ( talk) 17:19, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William Jackson Hooker you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap ( talk) 11:01, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

October GAN Backlog Drive As you have taken part in previous GAN Backlog drives, or are a prolific GAN reviewer, you might be interested to know that the October 2020 GAN Backlog Drive starts on October 1, and will continue until the end of the month.

-- Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:46, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

The article William Jackson Hooker you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William Jackson Hooker for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap ( talk) 18:42, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Just noticed that the article passed, congrats! I see you are working on George Vincent now – I must ask, where does your interest stem from this fascinating school of painters? Before reading Daniell I don't think I knew much, if anything, about them. I can see a little bit of Turner in their works, but substantial romantic individuality as well... Aza24 ( talk) 05:14, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

@ Aza24:Hi, several Norwich School paintings are on display at the art gallery near me, so I can go and look at them regularly. I rather like them, and some of the artists (even the ones that died young) had interesting lives. Regards, Amitchell125 ( talk) 06:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Ah I see now, it must be a joy to have such a nice museum near you! I see Vincent is at PR, I will try and give some comments when I find the time. Aza24 ( talk) 16:55, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karsakpay inscription, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hermitage.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:52, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello  Lizzy150, SandyGeorgia, and Ceoil: - there's not yet been any comments made in the peer review of George Vincent (painter), a contemporary of E.T. Daniell that I have been working on. Vincent was another fascinating artist from Norwich who lived in London, died young, painted the countryside—but he died under different circumstances. Would you be interested in taking a look? Amitchell125 ( talk) 11:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Amitchell, not ignoring this...will get to it shortly. Ceoil ( talk) 01:08, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Congrats on the 2nd FA. Ceoil ( talk) 13:32, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

@ Ceoil: - many thanks, I'll try to go in a different direction for my next attempt. Amitchell125 ( talk) 18:37, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Yes, you should break out, topic wise. You obviously have a lot of knowledge. Ceoil ( talk) 00:41, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

	The Chess Barnstar
	I noticed your contributions to Chess and I found them really amazing so I am giving you this in honour. Cupper52 ( talk) 17:41, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Amitchell125, I've begun working on the copy-edit you requested at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page for the article Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Please feel free to contact me and to correct or revert my edits if necessary. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 09:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Amitchell125, please note the c/e will involve the prose only; I will not be altering any of the technical or mathematical content, of which I have no knowledge. Feel free to correct any errors I accidentally introduce to the article. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 09:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

@ Baffle gab1978: Many thanks for taking on the challenge. Amitchell125 ( talk) 10:26, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi again; due to an objection on my talk page from a major contributor to the article, I am abandoning my c/e. I've also put the request on hold with a view to declining it without prejudice to relisting once the issues are fixed. Feel free to discuss at REQ talk. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 11:20, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, I understand why your c/e has been abandoned, and sorry your efforts came to nothing. All the best, Amitchell125 ( talk) 13:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

No problem; feel free to re-add the request to the Requests page once the article is rewritten and ready for a full c/e. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 20:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

		The Copyeditor's Barnstar
		Thank you for the exemplary review on the Cem river and the valuable edits. Maleschreiber ( talk) 19:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

October

music today, - enchanting, said a critic about the Mendelssohn that I heard on 3 October, - this video is older, and the YT in the article comes with a Bach encore as she played for us. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:56, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

16 October memories + I reviewed Cem for DYK and had practically no work because you did it all, - thank you! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

@ Gerda Arendt: Thanks, the poor editor had to wait months before I realised all the his Albanian/Montenegrin sources could be translated online. Working on your hymn now, but also—if you're interested—I put up George Vincent (painter) a few weeks ago for peer review and there's still time to make a few comments.... Amitchell125 ( talk) 20:15, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

I'll get to the painter, for PR or FAC, but am busy with a tricky FAC, Biblical criticism, and another is waiting, Honan Chapel. I began restructuring the hymn, - I want to first say what it is, then publication. Will take a while, - I silently hope nobody will look in the meantime. Please keep it watched, and revert too bold edits ;) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 22:00, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

I changed my mind due to the last reverts and comments. Could you reopen the GA1 and simply fail for instability, or whatever reason. I don't want to have anything to do with the article, and don't want to say so in the GA2 (which I asked BlueMoonset to fail, - it should not exist in my name). Things could have been so easy, compare Nun jauchzt dem Herren, alle Welt. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:51, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

@ Gerda Arendt: Done. Regards, Amitchell125 ( talk) 10:51, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. Could you now also work the miracle to erase the GA2 from the history. I don't need that as "started by me" which it was not. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 12:07, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Regrettably, the GA1 was not failed, and the request to withdraw was not posted there, which it should have. At the very least, the GA2 page should be deleted, which Amitchell125 can do by requesting a speedy deletion of it (use the {{ g7}} template, which lets the single person who created and edited it delete a page). I have adjusted the article talk page so it reflects that the failed nomination was the GA1.

I think failing for instability is a dubious proposition once the reviewer has withdrawn, as Amitchell125 did. What I recommended was that Gerda Arendt simply say she was withdrawing the nomination, which any nominator can do at any time (and should be done on the actual review page), and ask you to return and fail it, a reasonable request. Whenever a nominator withdraws a nomination once a review has begun, it is failed (per WP:GANI). BlueMoonset ( talk) 16:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

I was not ready to withdraw because I still hoped we good arrive at a version all could agree on. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 17:50, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Please, Amitchell125, word a final line in the GA1. (GA2 was deleted, which is good.) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:49, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ealdwulf of East Anglia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm ( talk) 22:01, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

The article Ealdwulf of East Anglia you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ealdwulf of East Anglia for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm ( talk) 04:41, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

The article Ealdwulf of East Anglia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ealdwulf of East Anglia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm ( talk) 20:02, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Ladbrooke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Printer.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:11, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

This is to let you know that Edward Thomas Daniell has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 13 November 2020. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 13, 2020. Thanks! Ealdgyth ( talk) 14:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

November

Thank you for the article "about a young watercolorist and etcher from Norfolk, Edward Daniell, whose career as an amateur artist was cut short when he succumbed to malaria in Turkey in 1842."! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:00, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

@ Gerda Arendt: You're welcome! Amitchell125 ( talk) 09:03, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

look for bright memories -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 19:59, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saint Walstan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wulfstan.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:29, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Jaan Puhvel.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:38, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matthew Parker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cardinal.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Saint Walstan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham ( talk) 23:20, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

The article Saint Walstan you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Saint Walstan for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham ( talk) 00:20, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Amitchell125, I hope you're doing great! If you have the time and will, please review GA-nominated article of mine, Thanks. - MRRaja001 ^{( talk)} 00:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

The article Saint Walstan you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Saint Walstan for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham ( talk) 13:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

		The Multiple Good Article Reviewer's Barnstar
		Thank you for completing 20 reviews in the October 2020 GAN Backlog drive. Your work helped us to reduce the backlog by over 48%. Regards, Eddie891 Talk Work 13:58, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matthew Parker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Registrar.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:17, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Matthew Parker

added a link pointing to Corpus Christi College

Thomas Erpingham

added a link pointing to Brest

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:13, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

I've just overhauled the article of the classicist Geoffrey Kirk. It's nominated for GA status and I thought this might be up your street. You wouldn't be able to review the article, would you? Let me know what you think! Best, Modussiccandi ( talk) 17:58, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

You're working on Tallis? How exciting! (I watch more or less every early music composer...) I always find Oxford biliographies is exceptionally helpful for composers. I wonder what your plans are with him? I'd love to help out – the article is in decent shape due to some attention by Waynejayes, but is still missing much information on his music, life through catholic-protestant courts and his legacy/influence (esp. impact on Byrd). I suspect that the "Liturgical calendar" and "Fictional portrayals" could be merged into a "legacy/influence" section, were it created. Aza24 ( talk) 19:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

@ Aza24: great link, many thanks. I'll do some copy editing and then start reading him up (and some of the musical ideas and terms associated with his period). I've been working on Matthew Parker recently, so the religious turmoil of the Tudors now makes more sense to me, and helps set the context for Tallis. I'll be tackling his biographical details before his music, please help out in any way you want. Amitchell125 ( talk) 20:40, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Great to hear. I may take a crack at a legacy/influence section like I mentioned above, and perhaps we'll meet in the middle at the music section. Speaking of which, I suspect that separating by genre is more ideal than the current division of early vs later. Aza24 ( talk) 09:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Thomas Erpingham you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Willbb234 -- Willbb234 ( talk) 20:40, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello I liked the wikipedia articles, however, I found very serious errors in the article: /info/en/?search=List_of_largest_empires I spoke on the talk page and I was completely ignored, but the numbers are not in accordance with what is studied in college, I think that instead of looking for secondary sources of politicians, it should focus, what the documents say, written by people from the time of each empire, and of course there is a variety of old maps and land names, which say the conquests more accurately, what do you think of that? if it is not based on land conquest, what is it? The list starts off badly: "The size of the empire on this list is defined as the area of ​​dry land it controlled at the time, which may differ considerably from the area claimed. For example: in the year 1800, European powers collectively claimed about 20% of the Earth's land surface that they did not effectively control. [8] Where estimates vary, inputs are ranked by the lowest estimate. From the beginning, denying historical facts, the list meaning that all nations lied, but I read very good articles on wikipedia, but this list clearly needs a good correction, or a good justification, because it denies all the facts of the story, which diminishes the credibility of those who will read it, and then there is another one thing, they use the same source for all empires, which is even more serious, can you help or improve the list so that it becomes more reliable? Thanks. ( 2001:8A0:FE8F:8B00:81D0:786E:DDB7:AD26 ( talk) 21:11, 8 December 2020 (UTC))

Precious

Eight years!

-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:13, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Erpingham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crusader.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Eadwald of East Anglia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Borsoka -- Borsoka ( talk) 23:40, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

The article Thomas Erpingham you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Thomas Erpingham for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Willbb234 ^Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 13:47, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

The article Eadwald of East Anglia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Eadwald of East Anglia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Borsoka -- Borsoka ( talk) 03:21, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Joseph Stannard you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild ( talk) 19:20, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Beethoven in 1803

The birthday display! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 16:28, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

The article Joseph Stannard you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Joseph Stannard for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild ( talk) 22:22, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Supermarine Air Yacht, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commission.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{ subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Amitchell125, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, MRRaja001 ( talk) 10:02, 24 December 2020 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Erpingham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castile.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:19, 31 December 2020 (UTC)