Hello, Amandine23, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 ( talk) 23:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pia Ehlers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic ( talk) 22:46, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Amandine23! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic ( talk) 22:46, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello @ Amandine23. I am @Archer1234. I noticed several of your recent edits that added citations where they are needed. Thank you for doing that.

However, the |title= parameter in the citations is not being used correctly. |title= should be used for the title of the article, not the publication in which the article appears. To include the publication use |website=, |work=, |newspaper=, |magazine=, |encyclopedia=, etc. depending on the citation template you are using (i.e., for {{ cite web}} use |website=; for {{ cite news}}, use |newspaper=, etc.). Also, you can use the |publisher= parameter to indicate who the publisher is.

You can learn more about how to cite a source at WP:CITE. If you have any questions about this for me, you can ask them here or on my talk page. Alternatively, you can ask questions at The Teahouse, where experienced editors are available to answer questions. Thank you and happy editing.  — Archer1234 ( t· c) 14:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@Archer1234 Thank you for message and explanation, duly noted. Much appreciated. Amandine23 ( talk) 16:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply