This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Nolelover, I just can't ignore few things. Not going in deep, just keep an eye on the work of User:Vibhijain, to name a few wrongdoings: adding too much red-links of non-notable subjects, adding common hyperlinks of geographical places like the US, Europe, Britain, etc, not following/knowing simple guidelines of MOS to start an article, filling [sometimes] fields of infoboxes with very weird terms, or at last doing nothing much to improve the article. Now, I'm leaving it up to you, because I know you handle these kinds of things very better. — Bill william compton Talk 03:29, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
|
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 16:05, 3 October 2011 (UTC).
Hello, this is an automated message to inform you that some errors were encountered while processing your delivery request (WikiProject Wikify's October Newsletter). Please deliver the messages to the following users manually, if you wish, because the bot was not allowed to do so:
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot at 16:14, 3 October 2011 (UTC).
Ref: Pir-e-Kamil
Hi,Nolelover,an IP 78.150.79.236 (talk) is creating problems again and again with different IP Nos.I have also checked the talk page,there is also complicated situation.The contibutor does not to understand and nor want to accept references.It seems to me that he has some personal motives.I had found the websites in which the original Urdu book title of "Pir-e-Kamil" ofcourse cited the "pbuh",but problem is that it is not translated in English version.I know that,it is very common to translate from Urdu to English,mostly are different spelling,and some time not complete and correct.I had added one reference and cited to book title name (with Urdu version),and one in external links.But the said contributor remains reverting and removing the references,saying name is not in English version.If it is so,then question is that,that the writer of the book name was translated Umaira Ahmed,which I corrected as Ahmad,that was accepted,(not by him).Please assist and help me in this regard that what to do and how to stop him causing rv,(vandal)?.Please take a look at Pir-e-Kamil.Thanks. Ehsan Sehgal ( talk) 20:53, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Ehsan Sehgal ( talk) 21:16, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Ehsan Sehgal ( talk) 03:47, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2011
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 07:39, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi,Nolelover,I had removed an image of Anwar Masood from Poetry,section Ghazal,with short explaining.But User:Bagworm reverted my edit,saying,Rv unexplained removal.
As I am familair of that area,I know that poet is only a comic poet of Punjabi,and a bit Urdu.In the article "Poetry",should be an image of any classical or prominent poet,not just a poet.I think that,but please assist me in this regard,that am I wrong or not?.Some time ago I have asked User:LadyofShalott too,but I think she is busy somewhere else,and I have also left a message to User:Bagworm on his talk page.I hope you will take a look at,as you always do.Thanks. Ehsan Sehgal ( talk) 19:03, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
with respect to Medinat Yisrael - Eretz Yisrael :
The rule for a7 is that the article must not even indicate importance. which is much less than notability. Actual notability is determined at AfD , not speedy. Any reasonable indication or claim of importance or significance in the article is sufficient to pass a7. Thus, when discussing an a7'd article , I always try to avoid even using the words " notable " pr " notability " . It's possible that the article did indicate some significance, though certainly it would not possibly be kept at AfD at the present time, & your advice to the user was mostly what I would have said also.
However, I deleted the article as being entirely promotional, and being written for an admittedly promotional purpose--to try to spread word about something new which is not yet generally known to the public;. That's the essence of promotionalism.
As a practical matter, for articles of this nature, I often tag both A7 and G11 in order to help explain the situation more clearly to the contributor--and so at least one of the reasons will hold. DGG ( talk ) 17:57, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors September 2011 backlog elimination drive report
Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors September 2011 Backlog elimination drive! We would like to thank all who participated in this drive. Here is the end-of-drive report.
There were 58 editors who signed-up for this drive, of which 42 participated. This is a slight increase from the July 2011 drive participation, where 39 out of 50 people that signed up participated. Thank you to everyone!
During the drive, we reduced the backlog by 146 articles, or by about 4%. Overall we did well, especially considering the exceptionally large number of articles that were tagged during September. Thus far we have reduced the copy edit backlog by 4854 articles, or by about 58%. If we keep up our current rate of copy editing, the backlog should be reduced by 65–70% by the end of this year. End-of-drive results and barnstar information can be found here. Barnstars will be handed out this week. Once again, thank you for participating in the Guild's September 2011 Backlog elimination drive! Our next drive will be in November, and we hope to see you there! Your drive coordinators – Diannaa, Chaosdruid, The Utahraptor, Slon02 and SMasters |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 04:17, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
This is an automated message. Your
editor review is scheduled to be closed on 12 October 2011 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive-->
to the review page will prevent further automated actions.
AnomieBOT
⚡ 16:06, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Trust me, I'm more disappointed than you are. I graduated from there in 1994. Thegreatdr ( talk) 00:21, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi,dear Nolelover,please take a look at new created article Haider Qureshi by me,please help me if any mistake remains.Thanks. Ehsan Sehgal ( talk) 14:25, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
1. http://www.blogger.com/profile/12505777007931359608
2. http://www.brain.net.pk/~urduworld/mohabbat.htm
3. http://jang.com.pk/thenews/may2010-weekly/nos-09-05-2010/lit.htm (This is I am sure,reliable source ,I will add it.)
4. http://www.brain.net.pk/~urduworld/yadgar.htm
One more thing,can you upload a picture of Haider Qureshi in his infobox,I have to learn it yet to do myself.If this link is not copyright. Someone says it is copyright.questionWhat do you think?.Cheers. Ehsan Sehgal ( talk) 21:58, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi there
I have received this message regarding a page that I tried to create in June:
A tag has been placed on Takethetrain.co.uk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nolelover Talk·Contribs 15:05, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
I am assuming that that means that part of the page is classed as advertising. Is there any way that I can rephrase the information to give a general description of the business rather than making it seem like I'm selling the site. I notice that the Trainline have a page, could I maybe recreate one for us with a similar layout?
Kind Regards Elaine
Ok, that's fine at least now I know where I went wrong. If I were to rewrite the article from a different perspective is there somewhere that I could submit it for review before uploading to the main database? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dammsel ( talk • contribs) 11:42, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi,I have created one more article Jadeed Adab,please take a look at,and help to improve it.Thanks.Love you. Ehsan Sehgal ( talk) 18:39, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi,Nolelover,please take a look at article Pir-e-Kamil,and my talk page and talk page of User:LadyofShalott and give your neutral,fair and bold opinion according to exact concept of wiki policies and guidelines.Thanks and Cheers. Ehsan Sehgal ( talk) 17:03, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Nolelover! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:35, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
Nolelover, your opinions and votes are solicited at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#Season records tables, inclusion of AP, Coaches and BCS rankings, etc.. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 15:38, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Invitation from the
Guild of Copy Editors
The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their November 2011 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on November 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on November 30 at 23:59 (UTC). We will be tracking the number of 2010 articles (and specifically will be targeting the oldest three months), as we want to copy edit as many of these as possible. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Diannaa, Chaosdruid, The Utahraptor, Slon02, and SMasters. |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 01:50, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Wilhelmina Will has given you some
caramel and a
candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun
Halloween treats, and promote
WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween!
If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{ subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message! |
Cheers! Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 05:08, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi! Just letting you know I undid your revision of You Read to Me, I'll Read to You: Very Short Mother Goose Tales to Read Together. I just felt that linking to book and illustrator was unnecessary and cumbersome. Feel free to disagree or whatever. Just thought I'd let you know and see what you thought. P.S I see you are also a Christian. Awesome! -- Limolover talk 11:57, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi Nolelover, it's really disappointing that nobody had checked the final results of October drive. In total, I wikified 55 articles, but didn't update the leaderboard table which still shows 45 in my account. I always thought that someone (project coordinator) would always check the results of [at least] people who belong to the leaderboard. I'm surprised and kind of disappointed that I'm experiencing this type of negligence from your department. — Bill william compton Talk 03:26, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello Nolelover. I am just letting you know that I deleted Lemonbars, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 21:27, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |