Hi Aitraintheeditorandgamer! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Garuda3 ( talk) 20:02, 28 April 2023 (UTC) reply

The redirect Embankemnt tube station has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 11 § Embankemnt tube station until a consensus is reached. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 15:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits, such as those to Car, appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. Belbury ( talk) 09:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC) reply

See @ Aitraintheeditorandgamer, the thing is, with the Car article, you’ve made a disruptive edit for no reason. With the Train article, there already is a hatnote that leads to Train (disambiguation) which has a link to The Redstone Acceleration & Innovation Network. There is no need to disambiguate something twice, or give priority to one particular acronym/abbreviation/initialism over others (also note, there are other abbreviations that include some variation of the letters in “TRAIN”, not just the one you keep adding). Please stop. Fork99 ( talk) 10:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC) reply

And rather than making sarcastic edit summaries, I would advise you to talk things out on the affected article(s)’s talk page(s). Wikipedia’s policy of WP:CONSENSUS must be upheld, and you are at risk of being in an edit war and/or breaking the three revert rule which can lead to blocks. Fork99 ( talk) 10:31, 17 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi, I see that you have renamed the articles GWR 5700 Class, GWR 850 Class, GER Classes S46, D56 and H88, GWR 2021 Class and GWR 5400 Class so that the word "Class" is lowercased to "class". This goes against a long-standing naming convention; I can't find where consensus for such changes was agreed, nor even any relevant recent discussion. Accordingly, I shall soon revert the moves.

Please don't move any more; instead, I suggest that you start a generic discussion at WT:UKRAIL. -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 19:39, 26 June 2023 (UTC) reply

I changed 2-8-8-8-2 to a redirect because you've produced no claim of notability. We need significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. I recommend you develop this content elsewhere until it is ready. Chris Troutman ( talk) 01:13, 23 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Same is true for 2-10-10-10-10-10-2. Chris Troutman ( talk) 02:15, 23 October 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2-8-8-8-2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2-8-8-8-2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chris Troutman ( talk) 01:47, 27 October 2023 (UTC) reply

(C&P from User talk:マイヤー式機関車 -- マイヤー式機関車 ( talk) 07:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC)) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply