User_talk:Adamplevinson References

This is Adamplevinson's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:William Waller Hening has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:William Waller Hening. Thanks! KJP1 ( talk) 07:38, 29 December 2017 (UTC) reply

AfC notification: Draft:William Waller Hening has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:William Waller Hening. Thanks! KJP1 ( talk) 07:40, 29 December 2017 (UTC) reply

AfC notification: Draft:William Waller Hening has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:William Waller Hening. Thanks! KJP1 ( talk) 07:42, 29 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Waller Hening has been accepted

William Waller Hening, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KJP1 ( talk) 07:53, 29 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Congratulations on this. Just a couple of comments. It's currently a bit of a wall of text. Can you break it up into sections, as you did for Zephaniah Swift. And add some Categories. And maybe an infobox. Regards. KJP1 ( talk) 07:55, 29 December 2017 (UTC) reply

One other thing. An editor's rightly tagged the article as not having links to any other articles. There must be loads that could be added. KJP1 ( talk) 08:53, 29 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: John P. Kaminski (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Spinster300 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John P. Kaminski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 ( talk) 11:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Adamplevinson! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spinster300 ( talk) 11:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: John P. Kaminski (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No relevant improvment. Needs to be entirely rewritten in an encyclopedic tone and manner. In addition, limit the list of his publication to the 5-7 most notable/cited and limit quoting to a sentence or two.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John P. Kaminski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 ( talk) 20:26, 19 January 2024 (UTC) reply

AfC notification: Draft:John P. Kaminski has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John P. Kaminski. Thanks! asilvering ( talk) 18:37, 7 February 2024 (UTC) reply

AfC notification: Draft:John P. Kaminski has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John P. Kaminski. Thanks! asilvering ( talk) 18:38, 7 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 20:34, 8 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBritinator was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This submission still needs work before being accepted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBritinator ( talk) 17:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: John P. Kaminski (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul W was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As a previous reviewer has said, Kaminski is surely notable, but the article is a somewhat promotional (for me, too many extensive quotes lauding his work), and some of the draft article's concentration on the DHRC could be extracted into a separate article. Kaminski clearly has written extensively about other subjects, but this is only alluded to in the books section (where there are no sources) - surely there are book reviews, etc? The Wisconsin Scholar is a personal reminiscence by Kaminski (so not a reliable source - WP:RS) and there is also heavy reliance upon another article he wrote. Is there significant coverage about him, rather than by him, ideally in reliable, independent, secondary sources with a reputation for accuracy and fact-checking?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John P. Kaminski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul W ( talk) 16:47, 22 February 2024 (UTC) reply