Hello, I'm
Lynch44. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
NS Class 1700, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Lynch44 (
talk) 21:36, 7 April 2024 (UTC)reply
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's
guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
UBR
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
blocking policy).
I am just editing the typo: nDDm doesn't exist and there isn't really a source for something that doesn't exist. I got frustrated and i know what i did is wrong. (Not the nDDm edit part)
92.66.185.205 (
talk) 21:52, 7 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Decline reason:
This is incoherent. The block is inappropriate, there's no way you should have talk page access. I'll go correct that.
Yamla (
talk) 21:54, 7 April 2024 (UTC)reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the
guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{
unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Whether you are right or wrong, the reality is you were attempting to brute force your changes into the article, against our
Wikipedia:Edit warring policy. You've been repeatedly warned about your behavior. Instead of trying to work towards an amicable solution, you decided to attempt to use edit summaries such as "Fuck You, Go kill yourself. Here are your fucking sources you bitch" and post "Go Kill Yourself" to my talk page. Then, once blocked, you try to excuse it all away saying you know what you did is wrong. If you know what you did is wrong, you shouldn't have been doing it in the first place. Nobody here is going to be impressed by nor swayed by you telling people to go kill themselves. It's entirely a reflection of your incompatibility with this community of editors. If you actually want to progress towards fixing the article because you believe it is wrong, then you should be starting a discussion on the article's talk page laying out why it is wrong and providing
reliable,
secondary sources that support what you are saying. You can also contest content that is already in the article in such a discussion. Attempting to edit war isn't your way forward. After your block has expired, you are welcome to start such a discussion. Evading the block or resuming your negative behavior after the block expires will never achieve what you want to achieve. There may be collaborative websites in the world where behaving such as you have will convince the masses of editors that you are right and they are wrong, but Wikipedia isn't one of them. --
Hammersoft (
talk) 23:15, 7 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I'll add to what Hammersoft is saying. Telling people to kill themselves is fundamentally incompatible with being a Wikipedia editor. We don't tolerate that here. --
Yamla (
talk) 11:22, 8 April 2024 (UTC)reply
This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address.