Hi 1brianm7! I noticed your contributions to Kylian Mbappé and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Mattythewhite ( talk) 00:17, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to
Wikipedia are appreciated, but
a recent edit of yours has an
edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an
article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use
the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you.
SNUGGUMS (
talk /
edits) 16:17, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, about that, I made a constructive edit but some internet problems led to the edit being posted twice. 1brianm7 ( talk) 11:53, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi 1brianm7! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.
WikiVirus
C
(talk) 00:44, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Boyega, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadline. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
I am writing about your changing "blacks" to "African Americans" at Frederick Douglass. I am fine with your edit, but I want to express my views on the subject. First, I believe that, if one is going to use "black," the convention now is to capitalize it (but not to capitalize "white"; there is a logic to that, which I am not sure that I can explain). But I also believe, and this may be an eccentricity on my part, that we should not use "Black" or "African American" as nouns but should use them as adjectives preceding "person" or "people." This is because, to refer to a Black person as a "Black" or "African American" is to define him or her by his race, whereas race is only one feature of a person. If we were referring to a group of NBA players, we say that they were tall people, not "talls." This is because their height is only one feature of them. But I am not going to change your edit of Frederick Douglass to "African American people," because it is not incorrect, even if it is not my preference. By the way, you write "changed word to fit previous words used," but I see no problem with using both "Black" and "African American" in the same article. Maurice Magnus ( talk) 13:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message. The point about previous words used was pretty unclear of me, I knew that the standard is to capitalize Black but it was not capitalized and noticed that in the same paragraph it used African Americans.
- Knowing that what was currently there was wrong and that there was a perfectly viable alternative at hand, I made the edit. I probably should have made that clearer.
- I'm under the impression that Black is capitalized because it represents a culture, not just a color.
- I'm not sure why I didn't just capitalize it, I'd suppose it's probably because going "Blacks" felt really weird.
- I can see your point with not including people or person, it does feel a tad weird, but I'm not at all confident enough in that decision to begin enforcing it.
- I've misread style guides and done bad edits enough times to make me cautious of changing things in ways I may be ignorant of, especially since it's really annoying to go back and revert those edits.
1brianm7 (
talk) 15:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- "Black is capitalized because it represents a culture, not just a color." That's a good, simple, way to put it. I'll have to remember it. Thanks. Maurice Magnus ( talk) 15:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC)