If you want to contact me leave a messagge in my it talk, or write under here and after leave a messagge here -- Dario vet 14:31, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Dario vet, I removed the three admin userboxes from your userpage because they were causing you to be listed in Category:Wikipedia administrators. Please don't use them anyway because the links on "is" and "administrator" lead to the en WP sysop log and the en WP Administrators page. This could be very confusing and misleading for editors. Thanks, Sarah Ewart 18:16, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
I highly appreciate the support. Multi grazie! Biruitorul 17:50, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Hey Vector! No problem :) - Tangot a ngo 04:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- Interiot's edit counter doesn't work for the English Wikipedia, because the English Wikipedia database is not copied to the toolserver database. You can use Interiot's wannabe_kate counter instead for the English Wikipedia. Cheers, Tangot a ngo 09:47, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your support on my RfA. My nomination succeeded and I've been made an admin. I appreciate your support. Thanks again! =) -- Gogo Dodo 06:23, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
I would like to take the time to thank you for voting in
my unsuccessful RFA. Your Support vote really meant a lot to me. Have a nice day! --
Chris
is
me 16:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for voting in my RfA which at 51/20/6 unfortunately did not achieve consensus. In closing the nomination, Essjay remarked that it was one of the better discussed RfAs seen recently and I would like to thank you and all others who chose to vote for making it as such. It was extremely humbling to see the large number of support votes, and the number of oppose votes and comments will help me to become stronger. I hope to run again for adminship soon. Thank you all once more. Wikiwoohoo 19:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my RfA, which did not succeed and was closed early at 2/10/9. I am not discouraged, however, and will use the experience to improve my skills until a later date when I may succeed. Yuser 31415 20:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Hello, and thank you for the support on my recent RfA. The final tally was 63/3/2, and I have now been entrusted with the mop. I hope I can live up to your trust, and certainly welcome any and all feedback. All the best, and thanks again! — Agathoclea 13:43, 25 December 2006 (UTC) |
Maybe because I didn't know about it. Sarah 21:40, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your support on my successful Request for Adminship (final result 78 Support /0 Oppose / 1 Neutral) I have now been entrusted with the mop, bucket and keys. I will be slowly acclimating myself to my new tools over the next months. I am humbled by your kind support and would certainly welcome any feedback on my actions. Please do not hesitate to contact me. Once again, many thanks and happy new year! All the best, Asterion talk 16:00, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
You can use my clock code by placing: {{User:Xaosflux/WikiClock}} on your page, it will produce:
Enjoy!, — xaosflux Talk 21:10, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your support in the RfA on my behalf. It is an honor to have received your expression of confidence. To be chosen as an administrator requires a high level of confidence by a broad section of the community. Although I received a great deal of support, at this time I do not hold the level of confidence required, and the RfA did not pass. It is my wish that I will continue to deserve your confidence. Sincerely, -- BostonMA talk 20:25, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
The admin userbox is for people who are admins on the En WP. Please stop putting it on your userpage. If you continue, you risk having other edits rolled back at the same time because I'm not going to waste my time examining each edit individually when you have been asked repeatedly to stop trying to use it. Sarah 08:42, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- I have no objections to you using those two boxes you made. Thankyou, Sarah 12:57, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Sì, forse è meglio lasciare i video da parte, credo che lui stesso non li apprezzi molto :) — Canderous Ordo 10:27, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
I have no problem with it being used on the Italian wiki. It would require a few changes to deal with local page names, but nothing big. Please find me a trusted Italian bot operator who speaks English and have him give me an email. Dragons flight 05:02, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
|
Thank you for your support in my my RfA, which passed with a tally of 117/0/1. I hope that my conduct as an admin lives up to the somewhat flattering confidence the community has shown in me. Please don't hesitate to leave a message on my talk page should you need anything or want to discuss something with me. I have been one of the most active admins on Commons, and will turn the same attitude to work to my en duties :)-- Nilf anion ( talk) 22:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC) |
Please take a few moments and fill in the data for your bot on Wikipedia:Bots/Status Thank you Betacommand ( talk • contribs • Bot) 19:00, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
As a result of discussion on the village pump and mailing list, bots are now allowed to edit up to 15 times per minute. The following is the new text regarding bot edit rates from Wikipedia:Bot Policy:
Until new bots are accepted they should wait 30-60 seconds between edits, so as to not clog the recent changes list and user watchlists. After being accepted and a bureaucrat has marked them as a bot, they can edit at a much faster pace. Bots doing non-urgent tasks should edit approximately once every ten seconds, while bots who would benefit from faster editing may edit approximately once every every four seconds.
Also, to eliminate the need to spam the bot talk pages, please add Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard to your watchlist. Future messages which affect bot owners will be posted there. Thank you. -- Mets501 00:52, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Thank you for your support in my my recent RfA in which I withdrew because the oppose votes were almost equalling the supporters. I then decided to leave my account (Tellyaddict) and start fresh under a new username, however I quickly decided to reconsider after another user persuaded me not to leave the account - I am now glad I did reconsider because leaving that account and creating a new one was too hasty so I've decided to improve rather than starting again! I hope we can remain civil and that there were no negative feelings caused. Again, thanks for your support even though I withdrew it, your vote is much appreciated! Regards - Tellyaddict ( Talk) 19:52, 10 March 2007 (UTC) |
Hi Dario. I've seen you around, and never figured you'd be at my RfA. Rest assured that I heard every voice loud and clear during the discussion, and will strive to use the mop carefully and responsibly. Thanks for your support, and please don't hesitate to give me constructive criticism anytime. Xiner ( talk, email) 03:04, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for supporting my recent RfA. I'm happy to say it was successful, and I hope I can put the tools to good use. Shimeru 15:35, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello Dario vet, I noticed that you own a bot and I am very interested about wikipedia bots. Where does one enter the code that goes to the bot?-- eskimospy (talk) 21:14, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, you recently commented in my RfA, in which you wrote "I trus in him" and placed it in the oppose section. This is a bit confusing. If you oppose me that is OK. If you meant to support, could you please move your comment to the support section? —dgies t c 13:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for your support in my recent RfA. I have been promoted. J Milburn 16:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 |
.snoopy., thank you very much for your support in my successful
RfA. I am thankful and humbled by the trust that the community has placed in me, |
|
Thank you, .snoopy., for your support on my recent RfA, which recently passed 54/1/1. I hope I can live up to everyone's expectations. I will certainly take the constructive criticism I recieved to heart. Please, if you have any comments or complaints about my actions as an administrator, leave a note on my talk page. Thank you again· -- Selket Talk 18:44, 1 May 2007 (UTC) |
Just dropping by to say "thank you" for supporting me in my recent my RfA. I passed the vote, and am now an admin. It will take me some getting used to with the new tools, but I thank you again for the trust. Have a good one, and, as always, happy editing! Jmlk 1 7 05:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
It looks absolutely fine - I only leave notes where there's a problem or something needs clarifying. Hopefully one of the bureaucrats will go through the requests soon - the page is getting a little backlogged again... WjB scribe 13:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- Obviously by that "looks absolutely fine" I spoke a little quickly - still you seem to be under the right name now :-). WjB scribe 21:04, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Ciao Dario, volevo chiederti una cosa: come si fa a cambiare l'username (qual'è la pag)? -- Barbagianni Potente 11:44, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
:) Btw, non ti si vede piu' su IRC ultimamente... Snowolf How can I help? 22:32, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey there! Thanks very much for your support in my recent RFA, which was successful. I was humbled by the support I received, and will do my best to live up to it by using the tools wisely and for the benefit of the encyclopedia. Thanks again! Tony Fox (arf!) 06:03, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
|
|
Thank you for voting in my RfA, which closed successfully with 44 support, 4 oppose, and 3 neutral. I will work hard to improve the encyclopedia with my new editing tools (and don't worry, I'll be careful). |
Hi. I would like to thank you for supporting my Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Magioladitis. -- Magioladitis ( talk) 23:42, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
I need help renaming about 200 articles. Doing this by hand would take me all day.
Can your bot rename articles, or be adapted to do so?
If so, please contact me.
Thank you.
The Transhumanist 22:34, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
|
Hey, .snoopy.. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the
Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! — CutestPenguin Hangout 08:34, 11 October 2014 (UTC) |
|
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)