Hey there. I noticed you blocked 66.74.10.34, who was reported on AIV, after I had declined to do so and left multiple comments to that effect, including inappropriate warning and the wrong venue. Did you disagree with my assessment, or just decide to block anyway? Always looking to improve for the future. Cheers, Ale_Jrb talk 19:42, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello Fred. I've been looking at the unblock request for 203.177.74.139 [1] for a while now. Though it has ports open I believe this is probably a closed proxy, restricted by ACL in some way, and therefore not available to our regular vandals. However your recent unblock and re-block makes me hesitate. I wonder if you could take another look, perhaps with checkuser, or explain what made you re-block. It seems to be part of a rotation between 203.177.74.135 - 203.177.74.141. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 09:36, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi, noticed you've been dealing with the recent disruptive editor on the Mac OS X page.
I'm not sure of the process. How do we check if this is User:Primetime? He was disrupting the Mac OS X article previously using a variety of sockpuppet accounts, and this feels to me like it might be the same guy. AlistairMcMillan ( talk) 23:35, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
For reverting the vandalism on my user page. I know who it was and I see the IP has been blocked again -- he's a fringe guy annoyed because he can't have things his own way. Dougweller ( talk) 06:50, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for lifting my IP autoblock and created an exception for my IP. :)
satr (
talk) 10:23, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
FWIW I would imagine that using a permanent full protection on an article because of a single vandalising newbie, without even warning them first, should be somewhat controversial.- ( User) Wolfkeeper ( Talk) 13:56, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Greetings Zzuuzz - after my nth edit conflict with another editor while reverting vandalism, he/she has suggested I apply for rollback rights. I'd been meaning to do so for a long time, but the thought of having to download anything, as is the case with Twinkle, etc, I believe, onto my rickety PC kept putting me off. However, this latest editor assures me that there's nothing to download, so here I am, visiting an admin who grants rollback.
As I spend much of my time here on Wikipedia reverting unhelpful/vandal edits, it would be useful and obviously means I could spend more time actually cleaning up articles rather than merely removing bad faith stuff. Cheers! -- Technopat ( talk) 14:03, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. I had wanted to do more editing on Wikipedia, but I seem to spend more time repairing vandalism than improving articles. I had avoided asking for rollback because I didn't want to focus on vandalism all the time, but it would have been useful with the Turkey–Kurdistan Workers' Party conflict conflict. Can I request rollbacker permission please? Good editing and happy hunting. -- Alchemist Jack ( talk) 15:49, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Y did u delete my Ed smith from modbury page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by The-quad-rider ( talk • contribs) 08:41, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Let me inform you ed is important! as is his work! —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
The-quad-rider (
talk •
contribs) 09:11, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Why are you accusing me of being a sockpuppet? I have done nothing wrong! If you don't beleive me, go ahead with your silly accusations and get the IPs checked!
And what do you mean by trying the communities patience? I thought Wikipedia was the encyclopaedia for everyone? What gives you the right to speak for 'the community'? I think it's more that the fact the fixed so-called debate is not going as planned for you, and that is trying your patience! Edward1967 ( talk) 12:16, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for restoring my user page.-- Zink Dawg -- 19:29, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Can you restore my sub user pages.-- Zink Dawg -- 19:29, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
I just created a Portal ( Portal:Gang) I need your help. If you have time, Can you help add some content to my portal. I would appreciate it, Thanks.-- Zink Dawg -- 06:50, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi Z~! Please take a look at this, and tell me what you think of it because I smell a big, fat rat and it is now frantically gnawing for page protection at WP:RPP. -- Dave1185 ( talk) 21:35, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Lol mate, why you blocked me ? I just helped with articles about Japanese Football. Stop, im not the first user with some complaint about you... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dantasu ( talk • contribs) 16:54, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Few days ago I was trying to create Hisashi Kurosaki's article, but I see something about you blocked my IP until August 2011... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dantasu ( talk • contribs) 18:25, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
It was happened just because I was using Mozilla Firefox with proxy... I edited at the tools.. sorry for the nuisance... C ya... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dantasu ( talk • contribs) 16:08, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Zzuuzz! Can you get some administrators to bring attention to Click (novel)? I also would like to request it be promoted to Start, as I just expanded it.
Just confirming I made the previous edits. I forgot I was logged out. Hcps-hoytca ( talk) 23:04, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the links. I was kind of trying to get the admin to show that they've been aware of the account for a few months, and no harm has happened in that time. Really I should just walk away and let whatever happens happen. So, that's what I'll do. Kind regards, NotAnIP83:149:66:11 ( talk) 20:42, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi zzuuzz. A day or so ago you checked the above IP for still being an open proxy and reported that it looks like it was closed here. Did you take any further action on this? I was just following up on the unblock queue, and Od Mishehu was saying he usually doesn't take any further action on these after reporting them to WP:OP. I don't mind following up, but I don't want to duplicate effort if you've already started on it (ie modifying the block or checking with the blocking admin). Thanks! Syrthiss ( talk) 14:54, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
First thing first - I have no idea what the heck im doing and how to use WIKI.. Am i doing this right? Or screwing up this page? I posted something under my user page i think..edenmarie13..asking for advisement. I am an actress and have been waiting for my Publicist and Agents to set up my Wiki page for quite sometime..they have more sources to reference than me but being impatient as I am..i just did it today. Very basic and only info that is verifiable by noted and linked to outside sources. Now I have all kinds of flags on my page?? I dont want to be breaking the rules and anything you can advise that will help me be in compliance would be greatly appreciated.
( Edenmarie13 ( talk) 20:34, 6 November 2009 (UTC))
[ [3]] Should it be tagged with a sock template? Enigma msg 22:00, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
On the assumption that you are some sort of Wikipedia editor, I would kindly request that you delete my page since, much to my regret, an ex-girlfriend (and mother of two of my children) has been periodically inserting sick and libelous comments onto my Wikipedia entry. I did not in fact post my Wikipedia entry and in fact most of the original info posted was factually correct. Unfortunately, my ex-girlfriend is still bitter after many years and somehow found my entry and decided to vandalise it. So I suppose the best thing for me would be to take down the page as soon as possible. I have no idea how this process works and even my lawyer has no idea how to remove the page so perhaps you can help me on this point. Best regards,
Harold von Kursk BigYalie ( talk) 05:08, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up. Looks like there's some weird stuff going on with this article. I reverted the blanking when I noticed the first couple of paragraphs looked legit. I see now that the bottom of it was personal attacks/vandalism. -- SquidSK (1MC• log) 05:35, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
As you participated in the recent
Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two
requests for comment that relate to the use of
SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the
SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.
For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (
talk) 08:38, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Might want to oversight that edit from B45hfhfgerg. Half Shadow 20:12, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Please see the above section about the adding and removal of an email message. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 13:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi, not sure why this template is at the foot of her daughter's page. I understood that Bristol Palin has a page because she is considered notable herself, rather than because of her mother's notability. Have you any comment that could help? You can tip me off on my talk page if you leave a reply here. Centrepull ( talk) 09:25, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
I have been watching the Richard L. Scott article for a potential rewrite, but it seems to keep getting vandalized by the same user 70.161.235.203 in the same way. Apparently the block you gave him last time expired and he went right back to it. Could you review his conduct under the 3RR and vandalism rules? IlliniGradResearch ( talk) 05:19, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Too many IP vandals, too little time to revert and explain to every single one of them that joke edits aren't appropriate. Thanks for the help. You seem to have missed adding the semi-protect template (big or small) though. Not sure if that's intentional or an oversight. In any event, thanks. — ShadowRanger ( talk| stalk) 21:25, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
When notified of the IP 65.92.127.234's changes to the Vandal Report Page, you blocked the IP. However, the AIV helperbot - if it can be called "helper" in this case - prevented the reversion of the placement of someone else - Grawp - in the IP's place (also done by the IP). This needs attention, as that user has been perma-blocked by the bot, probably erroneously. -RadicalOne--- Contact Me 23:29, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for catching this bit of vandalism! It's hardly the most vandalised page on here, but it gets its fair share. Keep up the good work! HJMitchell You rang? 16:58, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | ||
For dealing with the various sockpuppets/proxies like this one. Enigma msg 18:37, 30 November 2009 (UTC) |
That was a novel experience. Thanks for cleaning that off my talk page! Favonian ( talk) 23:04, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Ugh, don't know what happened there - was re-adding the Beeny.jpg image (that needs to stay in btw, it's not a badimage but was being spammed everywhere by a vandal) but must have edited an old version, think I've fixed it now, you might want to check. Sorry about that! Black Kite 06:38, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
I've semi'd indef due to the attentions of your fan club. Unprotect at your pleasure. Acroterion (talk) 22:45, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
A lot of the recent WP:OP requests have come from Dreamhost ranges, IMO there's no logical reason edits should be coming from there except through proxies. How wrong would it be to just rangeblock Dreamhost? Q T C 04:09, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Do you have any proof that this IP actually is the admin Fastily, beyond the IP claiming that he is? ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 16:43, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks very much for your swift action on this IP. Best wishes, DBaK ( talk) 00:22, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Happy New Year |
Hi I have been blocked on Wikipedia by you till 2014, because of using an unknown IP, but the reason for that is I'm using a VPN connection in Iran , because many sites are blocked by the government and I shoud use a VPN to open many sites and everytime it changes my IP and connects me to the servers in U.S. So I'm not a spam or something like that. Please remove my blockage. thank you. Bbadree ( talk) 07:01, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Zzuuzz, I was just wondering how you found out that this was an open proxy, and how I can find out if an IP is a proxy. Jeffrey Mall ( talk • contribs) - 19:32, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Hey. Neat work Zzuuzz. I'll take a look (possibly adding some stuff as well. Hope you don't mind) -- Kanonkas : Talk 09:37, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Tōru Sakai, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tōru Sakai. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. andyzweb ( talk) 11:11, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Zzuuzz/Archive 18! Malvern College, an article you have edited or contributed to, concerns an important school. It still needs some urgent attention. If you can help, please see Talk:Malvern College#Lead Section regarding how it may be improved. -- Kudpung ( talk)
I reverted the vandalism and will keep an eye out for more. Apparently this fellow has taken a dislike to one editor in particular, so there may be more as his IPs change. Thanks, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 01:17, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi Zzuuzz/Archive 18! This article which you have edited or contributed to, concerns an important feature of UK Education. It still needs some urgent attention. If you can help, please see Talk:Independent Schools Inspectorate regarding how it may be improved. Thanks.-- Kudpung ( talk) 04:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Sorry for the poor requests for protection/unprotection. Still not comfortable here. Thanks for correcting them and attending to them Supreme Unmanifest ( talk) 14:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for catching this. I'm watching an invasion thread on /b/, and it looks like I've caught their attention.
"Work harder, some faggot called "The Thing That Should Not Be" is reverting everything" (Linking would be useless, because the thread will be deleted sooner or later, as threads like these are actually against 4chan's policy) The Thing Editor Review 16:24, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for dealing with that sock. Something gives me the nagging feeling, however, that I've seen that lout before... — Jeremy ( v^_^v Boribori!) 23:49, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for all your follow-up on the essay-writing (and slot machine) spammers. Delicious carbuncle ( talk) 13:48, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
WHY YOU DELETE MY STEED MCPHAIL????????????????????????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Esiscool ( talk • contribs) 18:59, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
lol, we are making a real one now the other words didnt seem to go in. sorry —Preceding unsigned comment added by Esiscool ( talk • contribs) 19:41, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello Zzuuzz! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 889 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{ unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 04:55, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Why you block me—Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.230.11.96 ( talk • contribs)
We've got an abuse filter running for that dildo image now, so it should be taken care of unless the /b/tards decide to change something. The Thing Vandalize me 22:24, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is No Cussing Club. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Cussing Club (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:07, 20 January 2010 (UTC)