This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
If you're looking for an earlier discussion, everything's in the archives -->
Hi Zeng8r, I appreciate the comment you left on my talk page. I only made the navboxes for teams with rivalries in multiple sports to avoid redundancy. I generally made the navboxes for schools with at least two non-football rivalries. These non-football rivalries (basketball, soccer, etc.) are usually not linked in the existing navboxes (like {{Template:Florida Gators football navbox}}) and provide additional valuable information about a certain school's rivalries. For example, {{Template:Florida Gators rivalries navbox}} includes seven football and two basketball rivalries. From the individual football and basketball rivalry pages, there is no ability to easily find the school's rivalries in another sport. I do not anticipate making any further navboxes as these would fall outside the two non-football rivalries scope. If you have any further advice, I would appreciate your input to avoid mass deletion. Thanks. B1GLAX2 ( talk) 19:17, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
I'm willing to talk about this with a cool head, but I'm having a hard time justifying the inclusion of a regional ingredient in the traditional ingredient list when clearly there is a dedicated subsection for that discussion. Why only include salami, when there are other regional ingredients not explicitly listed in this section? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:84A0:87CF:51D1:4340:8A25:143C (talk) 20:43, 27 January 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:84A0:87CF:51D1:4340:8A25:143C ( talk)
I'm not sure what silliness you're referring to, as my only edit was to remove "perhaps salami" from a section where it didn't belong. I understand the backstory of the cuban sandwich. My point is, in the initial ingredient section, why include a debated ingredient. Why not include the agreed upon ingredients only, and save the debated ingredients for the regional variations section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:84A0:87CF:137:570C:570C:F014 ( talk) 00:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Would like to find a source for that game. Thanks for calling attention to those articles. Cake ( talk) 16:59, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi, sorry about that mistake. Memorias doesn't seem to be a word though... perhaps we should correct it to memoria? Thanks -- Ferien ( talk) 12:19, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Hey, thank you for acknowledging the Water Street (Tampa) article. How can we get the Wiki Project Tampa Bay back to a status of Active? Is there anything I can do? Cheers! Connorgrill ( talk) 23:59, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gasparilla Pirate Festival you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sarangem -- Sarangem ( talk) 11:02, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, the Tampa Bay History Center was established on September 21, 1989 ( source)and has operated as an institution at several locations before opening at 801 Water Street. Would it be appropriate to update the established date to 1989? 47.206.189.189 ( talk) 18:08, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
The GAR of Gasparilla Pirate Festival has started. I have marked some improvements to make in article. You can see it here and improve. Thanks. Sarangem ( talk) 15:49, 30 August 2023 (UTC) The =The talk page= heading is conflicting with recent discussions. You can add {{User:MiszaBot/config}} template for archiving. Sarangem ( talk) 16:07, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
The article Gasparilla Pirate Festival you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Gasparilla Pirate Festival for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sarangem -- Sarangem ( talk) 18:43, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gasparilla Pirate Festival you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas ( talk) 20:01, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Gasparilla Pirate Festival you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gasparilla Pirate Festival and Talk:Gasparilla Pirate Festival/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas ( talk) 23:41, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Gasparilla Pirate Festival you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gasparilla Pirate Festival for comments about the article, and Talk:Gasparilla Pirate Festival/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas ( talk) 20:22, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Your hook is at 181 characters, which is a bit long. Maybe try adding a shorter, alternate hook in addition to what you have. Viriditas ( talk) 00:49, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
( t · c) buidhe 02:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Media guides claim Florida baseball starts in 1912, but the 1911 yearbook has a team picture. With coach Dougal Buie in his UNC outfit. Also, looks like they might have a pre-history before 1906 like the football team does. In 1902, Mercer beat "Florida". Mercer had a good pitcher named Porter. Mercer ends the year upsetting Georgia 3-1 to ruin UGA's first attempt at a Southern title. Haven't found anything elaborating on who the Florida team was. Heisman's Clemson team beat Mercer, making any claim to a title a mess. Cake ( talk) 18:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
On 2 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gasparilla Pirate Festival, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that since 1904 the Gasparilla Pirate Festival (float pictured) in Tampa, Florida, has featured a pirate-themed parade? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gasparilla Pirate Festival. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Gasparilla Pirate Festival), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.