This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Daniel, I respect your views so here's my question. Noticed your Keep vote on this AfD. The problem is that the content under this Title may be substantial, but how is it compiled? If the title refers to the Scientology doctrine, then that implies a broad set of non-academic ("religious") allegations of abuse. If the title refers to a term that is used within academic and comparable secondary sources, then the content would be quite narrow. Because the title is so vague, the article is getting a mish-mash of compiled allegations. This is either WP:SYNTH or, by default, the Scientology approach. Even if you don't change your Keep vote, how would we get this article onto an encyclopedic track? Thanks. (I'll post this on AfD) HG | Talk 14:23, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
for the smile! (and if it was you who aligned my user boxes - thanks for that too!) -- HarpooneerX 02:42, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I just wanted to let you know I changed the references in the "fair-use rationale" in Image:Time_evolution_wars.jpg to "magazine" where it had said "book". This sort of mistake is typical when adapting templates and rationales to particular uses (though there's some slow progress presently being made towards abating this situation of requiring users to give the "rationale for the rationale", so to speak). Having changed the rationale for the rationale for the use of the image, I thought you should be aware that I had changed it, in the event that you wanted your statement in the IfD to match the existing statement on the image page. ... Kenosis 03:21, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I wonder if you would revisist Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chelmer Valley High School, please? The article has been rewritten showing the school has been independently judged to be Outstanding with a world record breaking gymnastics team. TerriersFan 17:14, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Nice work on catching that! - Domthedude001 01:44, 30 October 2007 (UTC)