User talk:Fox: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia Jump to content

User talk:Fox: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Kaiba (talk | contribs)
Spot (talk | contribs)
Line 157: Line 157:
Except i didn't vandalize. Therefore that is a fake warning, not legit, and it's vandalism. -[[User:Karaku|Karaku]] ([[User talk:Karaku|talk]]) 21:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Except i didn't vandalize. Therefore that is a fake warning, not legit, and it's vandalism. -[[User:Karaku|Karaku]] ([[User talk:Karaku|talk]]) 21:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
:Good faith edits are not vandalism Karaku, please read [[WP:AGF]]. If you contest it, don't start an argument and blame the warner for vandalism, otherwise it could be seen as disruptive. — [[User:Save Us 229|<font color="007FFF">Save_Us</font>]] [[User talk:Save Us 229|<font color="000000">†</font>]] 21:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
:Good faith edits are not vandalism Karaku, please read [[WP:AGF]]. If you contest it, don't start an argument and blame the warner for vandalism, otherwise it could be seen as disruptive. — [[User:Save Us 229|<font color="007FFF">Save_Us</font>]] [[User talk:Save Us 229|<font color="000000">†</font>]] 21:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

I got a bogus accusation of vandalism from [[User:WBOSITG]] too.

Revision as of 21:23, 29 February 2008

User talk:WBOSITG/TalkBorder

RE: Some Help 4 U

Ok thanks mate, I'm not goanna mess about with my sig again i'm just going to opt out of the auto singing. Thanks. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) 14:50, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of David Chellappa, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.hindu.com/fr/2005/02/11/stories/2005021100500300.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:49, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, it was a suggestion from AFC, should have checked. I apologise - it won't happen again. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN that one guy who buried stuff 22:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Woops

Hi, that was bound to happen soon ive been doing so many welcomes this morning one was bound to clash. Cheers Dewster_^*'_ 09:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi there I was wondering if you could tell me how you make those boxes on your userpage as they look mint, I don't want to copy them completely but I'd like something like them - J.Naven 13:01, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks mate for lettin me steal it - J.Naven 21:01, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still want a review?

Hi, I was working on the backlog at WP:ER and noticed your old review from January hasn't gotten any real reviews yet. Are you still interested in getting one? If so, let me know, and i can do it probably in the next few days. If you don't still need it, I'd love to archive it and reduce the backlog that way. Peace, delldot on a public computer talk 12:13, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bot

Hello WBOSITG

I was wondering if you have any idea on how I could make a bot? Or is there a page what describes how to do it like the one of "How to archive by MisaBot"? Thanks in advance Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) 14:56, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
For helping me with my userpage especially the boxes that I had no clue about and letting me sort of copy it J.Naven 21:24, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No probs, and I didn't know you were John lennon, learn something new everyday! - J.Naven 21:35, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Mo Afzal

Hi, I work for Mo Afzal, and I was wondering if there was any particular reason you chose to create his page? I'm very grateful and interested in developing the page further, however I'm definitly a newbe at editing Wikipedia pages!e == I created Mo's website at http://go.warwick.ac.uk/moafzal (which includes many links to his published articles and media coverage) and I'd like to extend the wikipedia article using these references. Msuxg (talk)

Welcome Message

Dear WBOSITG, many thanks for the welcome message. The first thing you could help me with is a matter of protocol. In replying to your welcome message to me, am I correct to do so here, on your talk page, or should I have replied at the bottom of your message on my talk page? Also, now that you've responded to my initial message (above), should I delete that, or do I leave that to you? Many thanks! Msuxg (talk) 20:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

Thanks for your offer WBOSITG, yes, I'd appreciate it if you would adopt me! Msuxg (talk) 20:25, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Just out of interest...[1] Pedro :  Chat  23:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, you honestly feel that granting me access to admin tools would be a net negative for the Project? Even before the absence of a good answer to "why", I'm left grasping at straws for "how"! Given my self-imposed restrictions and my extensive history with the site at the highest levels, I cannot see how I would not constitute an acceptable risk, if I must aspire only to that barest of qualifications. Jouster  (whisper) 23:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The goal of writing that question was to summarize the concerns opposers would be likely to have, and then to provide direct, concise answers to them. In the case of your concern, I'll contend that as , Wikipedia is or will become far too large for any one administrator to be able to competently administer all areas of the encyclopedia. Specialist administrators are a symptom of that "problem", and applications for general adminship through any other means than artificially contriving to get your RfA approved (read: forcing administrators to do what then amounts to work in parts of the encyclopedia in which they'd rather not be) will become more and more rare.
At any rate, though, whether you agree with me or not, I'd appreciate it if you could change your comments to more clearly reflect your generalized disdain for specialist administrators. Your current comments come off as quite brusque and dismissive, especially given that you're using an argument that I specifically refuted (ignoring this new context of how you mean to quote it) to condemn me. Jouster  (whisper) 00:03, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Is awarded to WBOSITG for thier outstanding work against the ever continuing onslaught of the vandals. Great Job! Mifter (talk) 19:48, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I saw you reverting a bit of vandelism so I decided to give you a barnstar :) .--Mifter (talk) 19:48, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop vandalizing Discovery Cove

It is southwest of Orlando; a more specific and encyclopedic location. 72.153.223.172 (talk) 19:57, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is one of several suspected sock puppets being created by a blocked user to evade the block. Any assistance you can provide would be appreciated. The case file is here. --McDoobAU93 (talk) 23:26, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This doesn't address the question —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.225.169.82 (talk) 23:36, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grrr.... 2

Completely nicked for me. Not even a smidge of recognition. I'm very displeased.The adding the small barnstars on top of the page thing :) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 21:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, heck, my bad. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 22:04, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lol. You're welcome :) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 22:08, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA 52 Pickup

Hi WBOSITG,

You stated that you were going to wait until 52 Pickup answered more questions before voting. I was just dropping a line to let you know that he answered a ton of questions that you can review in order to help you vote. The RfA closes later today (here's a link). Thanks, —MJCdetroit (yak) 01:37, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage design

I don't mind; I expect her blessing is worth having too. Could you include a "design by" link if/when you use it? Cheers. – Scartol • Tok 02:35, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you



Milhist Coordinator elections
Thank you very much for your support in the recent Military history Wikiproject elections. I went into it expecting to just keep my seat and was astonished to end up with the lead role. I anticipate a rather busy six months :) --ROGER DAVIES talk 13:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haut-Koeningsbourg castle, Alsace.

Welcome


SGGH speak! 20:05, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

The recent edit you made to User Talk:Karaku constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks -Karaku (talk) 21:05, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you'll find it was not vandalism but a warning for vandalism. Thank you. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN aka john lennon 21:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Except i didn't vandalize. Therefore that is a fake warning, not legit, and it's vandalism. -Karaku (talk) 21:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good faith edits are not vandalism Karaku, please read WP:AGF. If you contest it, don't start an argument and blame the warner for vandalism, otherwise it could be seen as disruptive. — Save_Us 21:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I got a bogus accusation of vandalism from User:WBOSITG too.