Welcome!
Hello, VeryGoodBoy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Thank you for your recent contributions to Songpyeon. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Korea? It's a group dedicated to improving the overall quality of all Korea-related articles. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Caspian blue ( talk) 00:15, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Mid-Autumn Festival. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution. —
Satori Son 22:35, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with
this edit to
Chinese New Year. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.
Angelo De La Paz (
talk) 14:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
You have violated the
three-revert rule on
Chinese New Year. Any
administrator may now choose to
block your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring.
Angelo De La Paz (
talk) 14:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
-- Jayron32. talk. contribs 14:49, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
You have violated the
three-revert rule on
Chinese New Year. Any
administrator may now choose to
block your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring.
Angelo De La Paz (
talk) 01:50, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
The added content looks interesting, do you have a source you can add for the history content?-- Chef Tanner ( talk) 12:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello, VeryGoodBoy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VeryGoodBoy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans
may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs) 13:22, 18 April 2020 (UTC) |
I am VeryGoodBoy ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) and Koraskadi ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki), but not the other accounts I am accused of.
VeryGoodBoy ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am Res Iucata ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) and Koraskadi ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki), but not the other accounts I am accused of. VeryGoodBoy ( talk) 17:31, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Don't care. Still a checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 17:43, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
VeryGoodBoy ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I did use multiple accounts, but did not abuse them to circumvent Wikipedia policies. I am not User:Ksjy0423, User:Relevent, User:Leftzombieout, User:Awrondio1. Nor do I have any relationship with them. As for this SP accusation, I was not given any notification, and did not have any chance to defend myself. I was already proceeding with WP:DR on the article Chosun Ilbo for several days [1] [2] before this accusation was made. VeryGoodBoy ( talk) 07:16, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Even if you have only been operating the accounts you have admitted, they have still been used in violation of the multiple accounts policy on Ryukyuan people, Yayoi people, 2020 coronavirus pandemic in South Korea and other articles. Yunshui 雲 水 08:38, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
VeryGoodBoy ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Then use those articles as the point where I violated Wikipedia policies, not Chosun Ilbo. Again, I am not User:Ksjy0423, User:Relevent, User:Leftzombieout, User:Awrondio1. Please get that cleared out. VeryGoodBoy ( talk) 10:21, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla ( talk) 12:20, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
VeryGoodBoy ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
First, I'd like to make myself clear that I was falsely accused in the SPI investigation and the SPI investigation made a wrong conclusion. I am not User:Ksjy0423, User:Relevent, User:Leftzombieout, User:Awrondio1. As long as the article Chosun Ilbo is concerned, I am innocent. I, however, acknowledge that over a long period of time I have on seldom occasions used more than one account on the same article or subject matter, be it intentional or by mistake. Either way, I make the promise that I will never again use multiple accounts abusively. And while not preferable, if it is necessary for my unblock, I'll only use the account Res Iucadata from this point on, and never use another account. Another main reason for my block, as I see it, is edit warring. To this end, I make the promise that I will make only 1 revert when I see a problem, and when that gets reverted, I'll immediately proceed with WP:DR, and only revert 1 per day if the other editor(s) is not responsive to discussion. This was my strategy on Chosun Ilbo of ending edit warring, and I believe it has worked well. Thank you for your consideration. VeryGoodBoy ( talk) 15:29, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Hi VeryGoodBoy/ Res Iudicata/ Koraskadi, There are a few open questions, and an appeal that does not address the following points can not be accepted.
Pleading innocence seems to indicate a strange perception of Wikipedia's sockpuppetry policy. You can not be unblocked without even acknowledging the policy violations.
You are welcome to create a new appeal that answers these concerns, but I personally recommend the
standard offer... and if it's just to prove your ability to disengage.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 01:03, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Original heading: From VeryGoodBoy
Hello, I'm VeryGoodBoy/Koraskadi/Res Iucata. I've decided to take the standard offer, and to prevent myself from the urge of getting involved with Wikipedia for that duration, I've retired all accounts by resetting the password to a password I do not know. When I attempt to return, I'll make sure that I inform an adminitrator that I am returning from those accounts and follow the proper procedures. Meanwhile, I want to make an appeal. Not for an unblock, but to clear things out by answering your questions, and also to address wrong verdict in the SPI case.
My defence against the SPI case - In the article Chosun Ilbo, I did not abuse multiple accounts. In that article, Res Iucata is the only acccount I had used. Jerm's main behavioral evidence is Kim Chang-Kyoon being changed to Park Doo-sik. Park Doo-sik has been the editor of Chosun Ilbo since 2017. This is something I did not know until I got blocked and looked at the SPI case. Jerm also falsely claims that I "restored" Awrondio1 edits. [12] [13] If you actually look at the two diffs, they are not identical edits. I removed what I considered were unreliable or biased sources and added new ones, and based on those sources, I also added an additional description that it is right-wing. Including my discussion in the talk page, these edits took hours of effort, checking the originally cited sources and perusing through peer-reviewed journals and academic books for better ones. While I was doing all that and also going through dispute resolution procedures, Jeff6045 was making minimal, if any, constructive discussion at the talk page [14], and then Jerm opened up a SPI case against me. I was not given any notice. I had no idea what was going on. What is the point of Defending yourself against claims [15] if you don't even know there's a SPI case against you. In the checkuser, the accounts Res Iudicata, VeryGoodBuy, Koraskadi and Farming with Karagga are correct confirmations. However, other accounts are not. I don't know the exact meaning of Possible on a checkuser, but if that just means possibility due to geographical proximity, then you can add 25 million people to the list of Possible, due to where I Seoul Capital Area. Again, I am not Ksjy0423, Relevent, Leftzombieout. I don't mind this VeryGoodBoy sock tag being on my confirmed accounts, but I do mind very much that this VeryGoodBoy tag is stuck on accounts that I am not related to. I admit abusing multiple accounts and accept the block, but the SPI case against me is a false accusation and has given a wrong verdict. I did not abuse multiple accounts in the article Chosun Ilbo, and I am not related to the other accused accounts. I accept my block and take your recommendation of the standard offer, but please correct that SPI case. I am not Ksjy0423, Relevent, Leftzombieout, Awrondio1. 2001:4430:D009:B448:0:0:903:8A7E ( talk) 21:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)