Hi
I have undone your edit to Alfie Moon. Please note that adding a date without a source is original research - something that is not allowed on Wikipedia. Please read our original research policy. Thanks.-- 5 albert square ( talk) 23:36, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- In which case you will probably have to remove most of the divorce dates from the profiles of soap characters since references to the receipt of decrees absolute are rare in soaps.
- Roxy announced that she was filing for an annulment in late 2013. Given the time it takes for such arrangements to be finalised, and the fact Alfie married Kat in 2014, it is reasonable to conclude that Alfie and Roxy's annulment was received in 2014.
- Changing the marriage dates to “2013—” implies that Alfie and Roxy are still married. Unless there is a source that proves EastEnders is planning a bigamy storyline, I fail to see why it should be left as such. If there is a need to be pedantic, “2013-?” would make more sense; what is absolutely clear is that Alfie and Roxy are no longer married.
Hello, I'm
DrKay. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Wallis Simpson, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
DrKay (
talk) 17:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Please stop using mdashes in date ranges. If you are unfamiliar with the use of dashes in English, please see Dash and MOS:DASH. DrKay ( talk) 18:00, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- What do you not understand about dashes? If you don't understand something, ask. Don't just carry on making the same ignorant mistake. DrKay ( talk) 16:55, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Frederica of Hanover shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Celia Homeford ( talk) 08:49, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 ( talk) 09:35, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Philip Noel-Baker does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!
Kautilya3 (
talk) 09:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Wilhelmina of the Netherlands, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
DrKay (
talk) 16:31, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alfred Enoch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bajan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi Vabadus91. I'm in the process of removing ethnicelebs.com as a source from Wikipedia, because it's not reliable (See User_talk:XLinkBot/RevertList#EthniCelebs.com). I noticed that you've added it, and wanted to make sure you understood why it's being removed. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. -- Ronz ( talk) 15:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charlotte Rampling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Model. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:48, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Please stop doing this [1]. I've pinged you about it several times, but perhaps you've disabled pings? DrKay ( talk) 16:27, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
The masculine form of née is an obsolete rarity (see https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/n%C3%A9). Please do not use it. DrKay ( talk) 16:37, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- Rarity is not obsolescence. It is only rare because women generally change their names upon marriage and men stick to their birth name.
- My understanding is that "d." [died] is used when the marriage is ended by the article subject's death, and "wid." [widowed] is used when the marriage is ended by the article subject's spouse's death. It makes no sense otherwise, and the two can't be distinguished if you use "d." for both.--
Vabadus91 (
talk) 17:50, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- You are wrong. The parameter was discussed and the community's unanimous consensus was that "wid." should not be used.
- "d." should not be used for the article subject's death because their death date is already given in the infobox and if repeated in the spouse parameter it can too easily be mistaken for the death date of the spouse. DrKay ( talk) 19:29, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Please stop using the "widowed" parameter, as you did at
Les Dawson,
[2]. It is
disruptive to continue with edits against community
consensus after being asked to stopped. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's
policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
DrKay (
talk) 06:54, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carlos Gereda y de Borbón, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:28, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Just dropping a note here to let you know I reverted one of your edits as the academic titles and honourifics such as "dr", "professor" and the like are not usually used on Wikipedia unless part of a well known stage name or nickname ( WP:CREDENTIAL). It seems that on most articles where the subjects hold such titles this fact is mentioned only within the text body, not in the first mention of the name, or the infobox. Thanks — 72 talk 23:31, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello
You edited this page a couple of days ago; I've left a question
here about it that you may be able to answer. Thanks,
Swanny18 (
talk) 13:48, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Bitcoin Magazine for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bitcoin Magazine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted, or merged with Vitalik Buterin. I notified you as you have contributed to Buterin's page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitcoin Magazine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jtbobwaysf ( talk) 08:33, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biographies which explains how we use honorifics such as "Dr.". This will explain why I reverted you. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 16:25, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- Further to this, as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biographies#Honorific titles, I've reverted your unexplained edits to Roger Gale. It would also be useful if you provided an edit summary, as explained in Help:Edit summary, to help other editors understand the rationale for your edits. ~dom Kaos~ ( talk) 20:32, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Vabadus91. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clive Anderson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Host ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 20:37, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dominic Raab, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Czech ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 18:46, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
Prince Harry. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
DrKay (
talk) 22:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Please do not space mdashes: mdashes on Wikipedia are almost always unspaced, per MOS:DASH. DrKay ( talk) 20:51, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add defunct or unknown parameters to infoboxes. It places articles in Category:Pages using infobox royalty with unknown parameters and simply adds to the code without any useful output. DrKay ( talk) 20:51, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- Regarding the above notice your change to Les Dawson has been reverted for the same reason. Please stop this now. David J Johnson ( talk) 20:51, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Vabadus91! There isn't any need to add formatting to infoboxes, such as when you bolded your additions to Diarmaid MacCulloch, as any standard formatting is included in the infobox template itself. I hope this makes sense and keep editing! Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 17:34, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hello again. Wikipedia doesn't include academic titles or post-nominal letters in the opening sentence or infoboxes or articles. Adding "Dr" to the infobox of Robin Ward (priest) was therefore incorrect. Instead, such qualifications are mentioned in the main body of the article. Thanks, Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 18:16, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Stop bolding things in infoboxes. You shouldn't need to be told the same thing over and over. Celia Homeford ( talk) 08:18, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Please stop
making disruptive edits, as you did at
David Landsman.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Celia Homeford ( talk) 11:48, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
-
George A. David (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Cypriot
-
The History of the Norman Conquest of England (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Whig
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:37, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
-
George A. David (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Cypriot
-
Queen Anne-Marie of Greece (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Her Majesty
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:23, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
No-one calls her "Rachel Meghan, Duchess of Sussex" and as has been pointed out repeatedly, nee is now deprecated across Wikipedia. Stop making these changes. DrKay ( talk) 12:40, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- Née is used all over Wikipedia — far more than any alternative.
- Nobody calls her "Meghan, Duchess of Sussex" either; she is "THE Duchess of Sussex". She would only be styled "[First name], Duchess of Sussex" if she were divorced from Harry. But since Wikipedians include first names for royals, it makes sense that she is either "Rachel, Duchess of Sussex" (who was formerly known as Meghan Markle) or "Rachel Meghan, Duchess of Sussex".
- It isn't a "more incorrect" form. Her legal name is (without commas) "Her Royal Highness Rachel Meghan Duchess of Sussex". Her forename is not Meghan, therefore she cannot from any perspective be "Meghan, Duchess of Sussex". The use of Meghan as for her preferred name ended today when she got married.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gerald Legge, 9th Earl of Dartmouth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:36, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nasos Ktorides, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cypriot ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Polycarpos Georgadjis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cypriot ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:28, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lisa Osofsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:19, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jonathan Guinness, 3rd Baron Moyne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mistress ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:17, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Vabadus91! As has already been pointed out to you at User_talk:Vabadus91#Infoboxes, please do not bold things in the infoboxes. Any desired formatting is already included in the template. If you continue to do this, it will be seen as disruptive editing. Please remove any incorrect bolding that you have done: your contributions can be seen here. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 17:22, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to
J. C. Ryle. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the
preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in red at the top of the page. Thanks!
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing) 05:21, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Vabadus91. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marios Matsakis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cypriot ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:43, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Desmond de Silva (barrister), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sri Lankan ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:07, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Helen Mirren, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Thank you.
General Ization
Talk 21:03, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antony Moynihan, 3rd Baron Moynihan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Void ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:47, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Swadlincote, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Midlands ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:46, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beaupre (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aka ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:40, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Rishi Sunak, you may be
blocked from editing.
Mattythewhite (
talk) 18:32, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Er, I have not disruptively edited Rishi Sunak's article or anyone else's ...
- -- Vabadus91 ( talk) 18:39, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Joicey, 1st Baron Joicey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morpeth ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:50, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Bizos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South African.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:41, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mary McAleese, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Licentiate.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Northampton, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. As I explained in summaries time and again, please read
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Pronunciation#Distinction between varieties of English.
Nardog (
talk) 11:42, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Northampton. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Nardog ( talk) 12:25, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
If one read the rest of the paragraph one could not arrive at such a conclusion. Presenting only the non-rhotic variant is not "to list both", and the "local pronunciations" that part of the guideline is talking about of are ones that differ in non-predictable ways, see New Orleans for instance. /ɔːr/ already and automatically means "[ɔːr] in rhotic accents and [ɔː] in non-rhotic ones". Nardog ( talk) 12:37, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adz Hunter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Triplet.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coronation of the British monarch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Camilla, Queen Consort, you may be blocked from editing. DrKay ( talk) 15:24, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Keppel, 7th Earl of Albemarle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles II.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Margareta of Romania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Her Majesty.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Camilla, Queen Consort shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Celia Homeford ( talk) 08:36, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Queen Camilla.
DrKay (
talk) 05:51, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- How did my edit "disrupt Wikipedia"?
Vabadus91 (
talk) 13:19, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Disruptive editing#Examples of disruptive editing #1 and #4. DrKay ( talk) 16:20, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
DrKay (
talk) 17:52, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Vabadus91 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
No idea what "disruptive edits" I'm alleged to have made... Vabadus91 ( talk) 23:37, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Excellent. Then it will be easy for you to show where you achieved consensus for this edit on that article's talk page. I couldn't find this consensus. Yamla ( talk) 00:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.