![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
The
January 2009 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 03:13, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
The
February 2009 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 02:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Good job expanding the Wayne Howard article! I nominated it for Wikipedia's Did You Know? front page entry. DragonflyDC ( talk) 11:45, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Jamie ☆ S93 20:21, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your assessment of Arkansas Razorbacks football, your comments will be helpful in the advancement of the article. Brandonrush Woo pig sooie! 14:32, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 2005 Utah Utes football team, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stifle ( talk) 10:48, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi Ute in DC/Archive 1,
I'm asking Wikipedians who are interested in
United States legal articles to take a look at
WP:Hornbook, the new "JD curriculum task force".
Our mission is to assimilate into Wikipedia all the insights of an American law school education, by reducing hornbooks to footnotes.
What you can do now:
Regards, Andrew Gradman talk/ WP:Hornbook 02:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
Great work on your edits to Holy War (Utah vs. BYU). You did a good job of making balanced edits to an article that sees some very partisan and biased edits. I tried to find a 'Keeping It Real' barnstar, but I don't think there is one. So thanks for not letting your own views get in the way of writing a fair and complete article. Glennfcowan ( talk) 03:13, 20 August 2009 (UTC) |
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:UtahHelmet.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Andrew c [talk] 20:15, 1 October 2009 (UTC) Andrew c [talk] 20:15, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
[1] — BQZip01 — talk 06:04, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
They're a very rough working prototype, but here's what I've done so far. -- Kevin W. 20:53, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
If you have the time I'd like your input on my proposed clarification of WP:Image use policy concerning fair-use/copyright versus public-domain/trademark image use. The proposal is contained here. Thanks. BillTunell ( talk) 21:35, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for updating that info. Where did you find it? De Fault Ryan 16:53, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Can you help report him? Bcspro ( talk) 03:33, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi there! I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. Recently, you reverted my fix to University of Utah.
If you did this because the references should be removed from the article, you have misunderstood the situation. Most likely, the article originally contained both <ref name="foo">...</ref>
and one or more <ref name="foo"/>
referring to it. Someone then removed the <ref name="foo">...</ref>
but left the <ref name="foo"/>
, which results in a big red error in the article. I replaced one of the remaining <ref name="foo"/>
with a copy of the <ref name="foo">...</ref>
; I did not re-insert the reference to where it was deleted, I just replaced one of the remaining instances. What you need to do to fix it is to make sure you remove all instances of the named reference so as to not leave any big red error.
If you reverted because I made an actual mistake, please be sure to also correct any reference errors in the page so I won't come back and make the same mistake again. Also, please post an error report at
User talk:AnomieBOT so my operator can fix me! If the error is so urgent that I need to be stopped, also post a message at
User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OrphanReferenceFixer. Thanks!
AnomieBOT
⚡ 21:39, 17 January 2010 (UTC) If you do not wish to receive this message in the future, add {{
bots|optout=AnomieBOT-OrphanReferenceFixer}}
to your talk page.
Hello! Your submission of
2005 TCU Horned Frogs football team at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Coldplay Expért
Let's talk 03:27, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Ucucha 18:11, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles ( talk) 01:30, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
I'm having trouble finding good images to use for those logos. I can't get the right lightning bolt for Air Force and the only SDSU logos I can find are straight, not curved like they are on the helmet. That's why they don't have the logos. If you can find me good examples to use, please don't hesitate to let me know. -- Kevin W. 23:05, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Perfect! Great idea. De Fault Ryan 03:26, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Ute,
You approved an edit by 38.117.242.194 ( talk · contribs).
Well, if you look at their edit history/contributions, you will see that the only thing this IP ever does is add links to sensational articles from USmagazine.com.
This is a link/spam monkey, only here for one purpose.
For example; in this edit "On the cover of Parade's Healthy Lifestyle, Michael's revealed that she had a nose job, but did not reveal when.", they took a story from another vendor ( Parade) and just repackaged it to drive eyeballs to their website.
1) Why not just cut out the middle man and go directly to the source? Parade is the source, not US.
2) If all this user wants to do is add links, they are not welcome here.
3) If you actually look at the article in Parade, she also said a lot of others things, but spam monkey 38.117.242.194 picked out the most sensational to drive eyeballs.
Just because it does not appear to be vandalism with a quick glance, doesn't mean that it is still a good contribution.
What do you say?
Thank you. > Best O Fortuna ( talk) 21:33, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
sorry sir for what i have done, please forgive me, i just want to share my knowledge upon other users. sorry for deleting the files in President of the Philippines, the files i deleted was my edit, and i think it mess the articles. i know that you'll forgive me, i'm Wikipedian for 2 years and i'll fell sorry for hat i have done, if you want i will put again that information. sorry sir if i use your time and effort for warning me, sorry sir when my grammar is wrong, just please understand it,because my Lingua Franca is not English, once again sorry sir, i hope that you will understand my reasons and i hope that you'll forgive me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.2.91 ( talk) 08:20, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Ute in DC, I saw your recent edit to Ike Armstrong regarding the 1933 Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference championship. My source for the three-way tie was the College Football Data Warehouse ( http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/div_ii/rmac/champions.php). I emailed David DeLassus, who maintains the College Football Data Warehouse, about the conflict with the RMAC website, and he explained that his source was the 1934 Spalding Football Guide, which states:
"The foot ball championship race finished in a triple tie between Utah University, University of Denver, and Colorado Agricultural College, each school winning five games and losing one. Denver and Colorado Agricultural played a scoreless tie, which did not count in the standings, according to conference rules."
Just wanted to fill you in about that. Thanks. Jweiss11 ( talk) 07:39, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my "test edit" to the page.
I had made the edit just to check theta the protection I had applied to the page (as
User:Abecedare) were working properly, and had intended to revert my change soon; but you were just too fast for me :-) Cheers and sorry for creating the extra work for you!
AbecedareClone (
talk) 05:10, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Take for instance Hamfatter - an English pop band. What on earth do YOU know about them, that you declare yourself an expert? And Scot Biao - you have edited various Wiki entry changes with the most subjective and obsessive meddling I have ever seen on this site. Are you some kind of crazed Biao fan? I am reminded of the Stephen King novel "Misery". You don't 'own' Scot Biao, you know - and you don't own the Internet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.12.192.73 ( talk) 22:11, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I agree with your restoration of Roman in a few places. Please see: User_talk:Hmains#Roman. Thanks. History2007 ( talk) 01:31, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
I noticed that you undid my edit to this page. LSU is ranked #16 in the current week's poll, as I edited. See ESPN.com. Neither Northwestern nor Vanderbilt were ranked in the preseason poll. See again, ESPN.com. Please do not remove accurate information and add inaccurate information. Thank you. —Ute in DC (talk) 02:20, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Sorry ment to put it back You deleted Vanderbilts ranking I ment to put LSU as #16. LSU is ranked 25th, 16th, and 19th. This is not a preseason poll it is when the teams meet or met. I know a lot of you do not want to see anyone out of the top 25 however ther is a spot for ranking so why not use it.
MDSanker MDSanker 15:22, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
The poll you are citing to is not the "Coaches Poll". That is one website's listing of the 120 programs of the Football Bowl Subdivision. It is no more authoritative than many other blogs. Wikipedia requires reliable sources. If you want to mention that CBSSPorts.com ranks Vandy as the 86th program in the nation, be my guest, but you need to do so in the appropriate place. Putting it in the table that identifies it as the Coaches' Poll is simply false. The CBSSports.com ranking is not the Coaches' Poll. It's not even a "poll" per se because the rankings come from the CBS staff and not from people all over the country. A better place to mention this ranking would be in the game notes section, if you intend to include it. —Ute in DC (talk) 03:55, 8 September 2010 (UTC) Retrieved from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MDSanker"
Well on the poll you are refering to your team is ranked 19th not 16th. MDSanker MDSanker MDSanker (talk) 16:01, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
No look at it at espn and see for your self Coaches poll LSU 19 not 16. http://espn.go.com/college-football/rankings MDSanker MDSanker MDSanker (talk) 16:10, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Hey Ute -
Do you think keeping the SEC football schedules updated in two places is a better way to go than to create one template? I thought I was improving the efficiency of keeping the information updated. Isn't that why they are there? Sorry that you disagree. DAWGinRoswell 01:58, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
I agree with this it is okay to link the page from the year by year page to the main pag since that one will be removed at the end of the year. — MDSanker ( talk) 03:18, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, Ute in DC, you are the king of clean-up. I'm glad you reverted the edits from BSUorangecrush...I'm a bit worried about that user's intentions (he added in all that obviously subjective stuff about Tennessee being the 8th best SEC team and Poole gashing Oregon's defense. I'm going to look and see if this is a pattern. If it is, I'll let you know. Obamafan70 ( talk) 21:25, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob ( talk) 23:52, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Shaky Smithson.jpg, which you've sourced to Stuart Adams. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MilborneOne ( talk) 19:15, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Ute--- thanks for watching this page. The edits were however in good faith: [2], but trivial and do not belong in the article. Regards, Kablammo ( talk) 20:27, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Arch Rivalry Winner is a legitimate and necessary addition. I will seek proper action if you attempt to change it again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.99.82.237 ( talk) 23:54, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
I've requested clarification on your AIV report. Could you explain how the edits are vandalism, then I'll reconsider the report. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:34, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for dealing with that state title garbage. Jweiss11 ( talk) 03:52, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. — Tivedshambo ( t/ c) 21:44, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:DeVonte Christopher 11-27-10.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Sfan00 IMG (
talk) 15:15, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
I know...I have begun re-adding them... Bcspro ( talk) 03:31, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that
biographical information about living persons must not include
unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to
Sharon Osbourne, you must include proper
sources. If you don't know how to
cite a source, you may want to read
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. —
Ute in DC (
talk) 19:32, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello. The source is her current US show The Talk (TV series). She just said her birth name was Sharonn Rachel Levy. For the other edit, the reason why I took out Arden is because one is only born with 1 maiden name birth name. For Sharon it is Levy. In the 'personal' section it is explained that she/her changed their names from levy to arden. Thank You. 69.140.66.37 ( talk) 19:45, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Why are you saying allegedly? It is the 8 Dec 10 episode of The Talk (TV series). TV is a reliable source. I didn't ask you to approve the edit. I will now go ask someone who knows what they are doing. 69.140.66.37 ( talk) 20:40, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the nice welcome message! I was looking for a concise listing of everything. Much appreciated :-) Cheers - Lord Roem ( talk) 00:51, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for the advice. I had not known there was a construction tag. What what I do without you? ;-) -- Lord Roem ( talk) 06:21, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
The award is very nice, thank you. :) -- Lord Roem ( talk) 23:24, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar and happy holidays. All the best for the new year. Jweiss11 ( talk) 07:47, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
You accepted a non-neutral addition here of this edit, which I have reverted. Cunard ( talk) 07:33, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
So, I am trying to add information to an article, and I would like to use a source that has been cited previously. How do I do that? Page I am working on. Notice that sources 1 and 5 are the same. Thank you! Jhunt47 ( talk) 15:01, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Not a big deal but please pay close attention when reverting multiple edits. — Soap — 01:50, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello Ute in DC. Thanks for the speedy deletion work you are doing; it's a very important activity! I did want to let you know, though, regarding
The Norwegian Sway, that current consensus holds that it is bad practice to tag articles for speedy deletion as lacking context (
CSD A1) or content (
CSD A3) moments after creation, as users may be actively working on the article content. Ten to fifteen minutes is considered a good time to wait before tagging such articles under either of these criteria. Please note that before an appropriate waiting period is over, the articles should not be marked as
patrolled, so that the wait does not result in the article escaping review at a later time. Nothing here is meant to apply to any other criterion; attack pages and copyright violations especially should be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks.
Reaper Eternal (
talk) 22:40, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for the welcome, Ute in DC!! And don't worry about it being late =] Swimnteach ( talk) 02:52, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Formal mediation of the dispute relating to Mercer Island High School has been requested. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the request page and the guide to formal mediation, and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page.
Message delivered by MediationBot ( talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 16:14, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that after I made the edit and I asked why on the template's talk page. Do you know why that is? -- Muboshgu ( talk) 20:03, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Hey! If you don't remember, you first welcomed me to Wikipedia. :) I just realized I broke 1000 edits!!! I just want to celebrate, and why not with the first person I met? Best regards, Lord Roem ( talk) 23:17, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
It's much appreciated, Ute. When you first step through the gates, it seems like a mighty big city, so it's good to be welcomed. How does one award a barnstar? :)
BTW, right on, bro/sis, with that user citing a TV show he/she alleged watched. If standards aren't maintained, we'll soon have cites to characters in MMP games. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rittenhoused ( talk • contribs) 06:31, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks and - a link you might need to know about regarding http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Contributions&target=Naughtiestboy - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Another_account - Satu Suro 09:24, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks Ute for the warm welcome to Wiki. I did not realize that I had signed a talk page other than my own. Did I make some sort of mistake? Sould I be signing (~ ~ ~ ~)on the "Edit Summary" when I edit an article? Thanks! TheGrouchWho ( talk) 09:36, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
The request for mediation concerning Mercer Island High School, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. An explanation of why it has not been possible for this dispute to proceed to formal mediation is provided at the mediation request page (which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time). Questions relating to the rejection of this dispute can be directed to the Committee chairperson or e-mailed to the mediation mailing list. For more information on other available steps in the dispute resolution process, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee,
User:AGK (
talk) 21:14, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the
Mediation Committee.)
Hey Ute - I saw you're a member of the Guild of Copy Editor and as I know you as well, I want to see if you would be able to go through and copyedit my artice Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez, as I want to increase its quality and try out an FA. Whoa that was a long sentence. Anywho, cheers! Lord Roem ( talk) 00:06, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Hey, just a friendly reminder to mark as patrolled pages you tag for speedy deletion so other patrollers don't run across them again. Thanks for helping out, and feel free to delete this message once you've seen it Feezo (Talk) 07:26, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello Ute in DC. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Anamika Kaka Datta Roadies 8, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Being featured in a notable TV show ( MTV Roadies) is a claim to significance. Thank you. -- Lear's Fool 12:05, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello Ute in DC, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I deleted Eastenders the butchers and jacksons, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow and specific, and the process is more effective if the correct criterion is used. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. nancy 21:24, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
What do you ask? — Preceding unsigned comment added by VJ-Yugo ( talk • contribs) 21:45, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Ute, I do not agree with your last edits and do not appreciate them at all; why did you delete them? even though they were sourced from many different websites, including Christianity today which is a very well known and objective website?-- 82.213.38.2 ( talk) 07:49, 2 February 2011 (UTC)-- 82.213.38.2 ( talk) 07:49, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
here are just some example of a quick search:
Website: Washington Interfaith Alliance for Middle East Peace Title: Reflections on Bethlehem
“Bethlehem, the biblical birth city of the Lord and Savior Jesus, is one of the oldest continually inhabited cities of the world. Today in Bethlehem, the descendants of Christ’s first followers are still present, maintaining their churches and honoring their faith. They are the Living Stones in the Holy Land, and they continue to be our Living Church 2,000 years later.”
http://www.wiamep.org/events/bethlehemreflections.htm
Website: Holy Land Christian Ecumenical Foundation
Title: Housing Rehabilitation Program (HRP)
“The Holy Land (Jordan, Israel and Palestine) is home to over 350,000 Christians, most of whom are descendants of Jesus' disciples and those whom the disciples converted. “
http://www.hcef.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=56&Itemid=69
Website: The Bethlehem Association
Title: Pilgrimage to the Holy Land
“The pilgrims enjoyed a tremendous spiritual enjoyment in tracing some of the steps taken by Jesus Christ, but also saw first hand the difficult life endured by the descendant of the Disciples, the Christian community in Jerusalem and Bethlehem.”
http://www.bethlehemassoc.org/sub_pages/AlbertHazboun.htm
Website: Mission Islam
Title: 30 Little Known Facts About Israel
“Did you know that Palestinian Christians are considered the "living stones" of Christianity because they are the direct descendants of the disciples of Jesus Christ?”
http://www.missionislam.com/nwo/littlefacts.htm
Website: Al-Busha (The Official Website of the Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem for the Arab-American Roman Catholics)
Title: Christians Are Leaving the Holy Land
“But the plight of Palestinian Christians - the living descendants of Jesus and the apostles “
Website: Counter Currents
Title: There's Nothing Christian About Zionism
“I responded just as fervently that the Palestinian Christians are the descendants of those who first followed Jesus and they have been denied inalienable human rights by the Israeli government.”
http://www.countercurrents.org/fleming130610.htm
Website: Western Voices World News
Title: Gaza's Orthodox Christians Celebrate Dark Christmas
“Palestinian Christians, descendants of church congregations literally founded by Christ's Apostles,”
http://wvwnews.net/story.php?id=6394
Website: Australians for Palestine
Title: Early Palestine
“The Christians among them are descendants of the first Christians, who adopted Christianity at the time of Jesus Christ and the Apostles. “
http://australiansforpalestine.com/history/pre-1948
Website: The Seattle Times
Title: Christianity in the Holy Land
Author: Floyd J. McKay, a journalism professor at Western Washington University, is a regular contributor to Times editorial pages. E-mail him [email protected]
“Palestinian Christians, descendants of the Apostles and their followers”
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2001822015_floyd24.html
Website: the official website of the Episcopal Church
Title: Don't forget the Holy Land's indigenous Christian population
“ Somehow, it was not obvious to me that Christians in the Holy Land, descendents of the Apostles, are Palestinian. Those blond Jesus images from childhood take a long time to erase. Palestinian Christians did not convert to Christianity; they've lived and spread Christ's message throughout the region over the last 2000 years. “
http://www.ecusa.anglican.org/80050_126617_ENG_HTM.htm
Website: Al-Busha (The Official Website of the Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem for the Arab-American Roman Catholics)
Title: THE FORGOTTEN FAITHFUL: PALESTINIAN CHRISTIANS
Author: Dr Anthony McRoy
“The Palestinian Christians of today are the descendants of [the] early Christians... Palestinian Christians of today are the present generation of that great cloud of witnesses to Jesus who came before them and who will, God willing, come after them until Christ comes again. They and their ancestors have maintained a living witness to Jesus and his Resurrection from the beginning of the Church, and they should see themselves dynamically continuing such a witness in the land, witnesses to the Resurrection.”
http://www.al-bushra.org/latpatra/anthony.htm
Website: Christianity Today
Title: The Palestinian Christians: Strangers in a Familiar Land
“My new friend soon informed me that Palestinian Christians had lived in the Holy Land since the time of Jesus, “
http://www.christianitytoday.com/ch/news/2003/aug8.html
Website: Jerusalemites
Title: Arab Christians: An Endangered Species
Author: Bishop Riah Abu El-Assal
“Two millennia later, Arab Christians, largely unnoticed and in serious danger of extinction, still inhabit the land, keeping the faith and the heritage as the descendants of the first church.”
http://www.jerusalemites.org/jerusalem/christianity/2.htm
do you need any more evidence and sources?
please revert back all the last edits. Thanks-- 82.213.38.2 ( talk) 09:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Ute in DC, after providing all these reliable and informative sources, don't you think its the time to revert back the last edits?-- 82.213.38.2 ( talk) 14:58, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
@Marokwitz: maybe Palestinian Christians came from the moon or mars, according to your political biased views! there is also something called logic and common sense.-- 82.213.38.2 ( talk) 09:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
@ Marokwitz, again, all ur edits are politically motivated and not being objective at all.-- 82.213.38.2 ( talk) 09:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
I advice you to do a little research before you delete information just because you do not politically agree with-- 82.213.38.2 ( talk) 09:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
I would say the exact same thing to you!
Moreover, your deletions have proved that you use wikipedia to promote political agenda by adding what you think is right and deleting what you do not politically agree with-- 82.213.38.2 ( talk) 12:32, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Ute in DC: after providing all these reliable and informative sources, don't you think its the time to revert back the last edits?--
82.213.38.2 (
talk) 07:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
I did read it long time ago and I read it again, but I could not find what you are talking about, as the vast majority of the links I provided above are reliable!-- 82.213.38.2 ( talk) 07:52, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
|
The Cleanup Barnstar | |
This barnstar is awarded to Ute in DC for copy editing articles totalling over 12000 words in the January GOCE Backlog elimination drive. Thank you for participating! Diannaa ( Talk) 17:43, 4 February 2011 (UTC) |
Good afternoon. I think he deserves an article. I have expanded a bit Hossam Badrawi. I hope someone will expand it. I will go to rest. Could you please save it from speedy deletion? Stuff are going here very quickly! Regards -- Youssef ( talk) 19:43, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi - thanks for posting the welcome on my talk page. You said I could ask you questions, so here is a question I have.
If I see a page that is tagged as having a problem, such as an "orphan", and I fix the problem, for example by adding links to the orphan from other pages, should I remove the tag, or should I leave it for someone more experienced to later come along and review what I did and remove the tag?
Michael Barkowski ( talk) 16:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
I'm seriously at a lost for words here......I see you have reported the user for possibly using sock-puppets. I'll support you if necessary. I, initially, had a problem with the same exact issue this person is having and, once I was informed of the guidelines for a hatnote, I relented. This user simply won't accept it. Even when you provide proof of why the hatnote must be on the page. Aside from the sockpuppetry, what is protocol on this issue? — Joao10Siamun ( talk) 10:18, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I have requested semi-protection of the above BLP page due to the recent (and seemingly ongoing) vandalism. I think that there is some sockpuppeting going on as you'll see from the history & advice given to the "various" vandals on their talk pages. Hope this is ok with you. - Sitush ( talk) 21:40, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Why did you mark those links as spam? Both are informational links on Jimmer Fredette. You will note that the AnnArbor.com (Ref. 20 - http://annarbor.com/sports/um-basketball/byu-guard-jimmer-fredette-takes-lead-in-third-annarborcom-national-player-of-the-year-poll/) straw poll report of Player of the Year references JimmerPOY.com, in addition to ESPN's story ( http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebasketballnation/post/_/id/22753/jimmer-mania-gives-us-epic-facebook-thread) of the Michelle Peralta "Jimmer Worship" story. The story originated on JimmerPOY.com, hence the "Hat Tip" by ESPN at the end of the story.
Hello, you recently removed my edit on the Windom, Minnesota page where I labeled myself as a notable native. Although I fully intend to one day be put on that page for the very reason of becoming President of the United States, I understand why it should not be there. (I was slightly hoping to have it there so when I ran someday people would know I have planned on it for a long time) I will be more careful to keep my future posts unbiased and verifiable. Thank You -- Ryan Vesey ( talk) 23:57, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
If you give me the name of a popular website where I can promote my books for free I promise not to try to promote anything on here again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChHP211 ( talk • contribs) 18:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your one revert back on 9 February from the NPOV edits by CAMIEkaterina, who unfortunately has struck again at NPOV'ing the Daniel Harding page. I've edited in back, but have no doubt she'll be back again. From her name, she clearly works for Columbia Artists Management Inc (CAMI). Given that Daniel Harding is the only wikipedia page she's edited, IMHO, she clearly needs to have her access blocked, or the article needs to be protected. I saw that Falcon8765 has also tried to revert the page and I will send essentially this name communication there as well. Cheers, DJRafe ( talk) 00:26, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi. On behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors, I am inviting you to sign up for our March Backlog Elimination Drive. Win a barnstar! It's fun. -- Diannaa ( Talk) 01:32, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Loved the fruit, and smiled at the finding them as alternative to cookies, :-). Hope UTAH becomes Pacific-10's protagonist and wins the conference in their very first year! -- Napoletanamente ( talk) 05:22, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
And nothing is left except the soothing smell of pine.. Half Shadow 05:30, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert. Sockpuppet has been blocked. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 18:35, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you Ute for the very nice welcome! I've always found Wikipedia very useful and decided to finally give back! :D Am treading lightly right now by just adding internal/external links...and correcting my mistakes! Thanks again Aislesoffiles ( talk) 02:11, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
I'd like this article to be used for DYK for April Fools Day, in which "tricks" are not only allowed, but encouraged, and besides, if I did not find the article in Amateur Photographer everybody would have believed it to be truth, because neither The Times, nor Daily Mirror never corrected their mistake. Could you please revert yourself at least for now? Thanks.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 03:49, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Why are you undoing my posts, do you know tonga like I do? I live and breathe tonga. I feel my edits are legitimate and are well known around the footballing world. Feldmans are the new greatest sensation. Seriously, what would you know about Tonga. I was born in Nuku'alofa Tonga. I know what goes on there. Are you in any sense Tongan or just a loser who edits random posts. Please let me know as I am really sad that the world is being deprived such truthful and delicate knowledge such as the one i am trying to spread. Do not want to sound mean or to instigate people, but I know TONGA! you do not! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Utedchater ( talk • contribs) 07:11, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
You still have not answered my question. Are you Tongan, or do you know anything about the Tongan soccer team? Mario Gomez, is a German national football star. Is Gomez an German name? Eduardo da Silva, croatian star...Is that anything remotely close to croatian. NO!!! Can you name one Tongan player currently? I listed a Toghill and a Vunga in there. Have you not heard about the Rata Tohgill referendum? Obvisouly not. If you do not know anything about soccer than you should not be editing. It is not impossible to score 78 goals in one match. Check this link http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2002/nov/01/newsstory.sport5 , the same guy scored all their goals. 149 in total. So do not give me this bull crap about vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Utedchater ( talk • contribs) 07:31, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
You are a vandalizer. Wikipedia would be much better off without people like you destroying knowledge of which you do not possess. If you are ignorant, leave the information alone.
Utedchater — Preceding unsigned comment added by Utedchater ( talk • contribs) 07:16, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi there, so I would like to set things straight on the subject of bill murray's son Cooper Murray. My name is Jackson Murray and I'm coopers older brother. You may consider adding the nickname "the ram" may have been vandalism but I assure you in all reality that Cooper honestly goes by "the ram" so if you could I would very much appreciate you not editing any information that I post in regards to Bill Murray as I am in fact a primary source. Thank you I'm very sorry for the missunderstanding. Dooglefish ( talk) 01:24, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors March 2011 backlog elimination drive
Greetings from the
Guild of Copy Editors
March 2011 Backlog elimination drive! Here is your mid-drive newsletter.
![]() So far, 79 people have signed up for this drive. Of these, 64 have participated. Interest is high due to a link to our event from the Watchlist page, and many new and first-time copy editors have joined us for the drive. If you signed up for the drive but haven't participated yet, it's not too late! Try to copy edit at least a few articles. Remember, if you have rollover words from the last drive, you will lose them if you do not participate in this drive. If you haven't signed up for the drive yet, you can
sign up now. Many thanks to those editors who have been helping out at the
Requests page. We have assisted in the promotion of seven articles to
Good article status so far this month.
We have already achieved our target of reducing the overall backlog by 10%; however, we have more work to do with the 2009 backlog. We have almost eliminated May 2009 and we only have some 700 articles left from 2009. It is excellent progress, so let's concentrate our fire power on the remaining months from 2009. Thank you for participating in the March 2011 drive. We anticipate it will be another big success!
The Utahraptor Talk to me has decided to step down from his position as project coordinator due to real-life issues. Your drive coordinators – S Masters ( talk), Diannaa ( Talk) and Tea with toast ( Talk) |
Sent on behalf of the
Guild of Copy Editors using
AWB on 04:49, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Ute. Thanks for your warm welcome. I wonder if you can help me stop continuing vandalism on the page that I have substantially edited on February 8, 2011 for Chado Ralph Rucci. Mr. Rucci is an American fashion designer who exhibited garments from his collection in quite a few museums. The only museum outside of the U.S,. however, is the Russian Fashion Museum, in Moscow. This fact has been widely covered and I have referenced it in the article, as well as provided bibliography. For some reason, wiki user RosinaR, without any justification, is repeatedly removing all information pertaining to this exhibition, as well as the relevant bibliography and the link - ru:Руччи, Ральф - to his page on Russian wikipedia. User RosinaR is also removing well researched information on younger celebrities who are known to wear his designs – highly important fact, as Rucci is often perceived (erroneously) as the designer who caters exclusively to older ladies. This is vandalism. Can you help me protect the page and put a stop to RosinaR's vandalism? Thank you. -- Robert Biddulph ( talk) 15:41, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors March 2011 backlog elimination drive report
Greetings from the
Guild of Copy Editors
March 2011 Backlog elimination drive. Thank you for participating in the March 2011 drive! This newsletter summarizes the March drive and other recent events.
![]() There were 99 signups for the drive; of these, 70 participated. Interest was high mainly due to a link to our event from the Watchlist page. We had a record-breaking 84 articles listed on the Requests page in March; 11 of these have been promoted to Good article status so far. Several of our recent efforts have received Featured Article status as well, and the GOCE is becoming a solid resource for the Wikipedia community. Many thanks to editors who have been helping out at the Requests page and by copy editing articles from the backlog.
Remarkable progress was made in reducing the backlog this month, as we now have fewer than 500 articles remaining from 2009. We are well under the 4,000-article mark for the total number remaining in the queue. Since our backlog drives began in May 2010 with 8,323 articles, we have cleared more than 53% of the backlog. A complete list of results and barnstars awarded can be found here. Barnstars will be distributed over the next week. If you enjoyed participating in our event, you may also like to join the Wikification drives, which are held on alternate months to our drives. Their April drive has started.
On March 21, SMasters appointed Chaosdruid ( talk) and Torchiest ( talk) as Guild coordinators to serve in place of The Utahraptor, who recently stepped down. Please feel free to contact any coordinator if you have any questions or need assistance. Your drive coordinators – S Masters ( talk), Diannaa ( Talk) and Tea with toast ( Talk) |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 14:40, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Modest Barnstar | |
For copy editing five articles with a total of 5,329 words (including rollover) during the Guild of Copy Editors' March 2011 Backlog elimination drive. Thanks for all your contributions! SMasters ( talk) 05:41, 4 April 2011 (UTC) |
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You didn't warn that 71.191 vandal. It is also sad that this is coming from a n00b (I've been here only a week). Who needs names? talk the talk 07:14, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors May 2011 backlog elimination drive update
Greetings from the
Guild of Copy Editors
May 2011 Backlog elimination drive! Here is your mid-drive newsletter.
![]() So far, 54 people have signed up for the drive, and 33 are actively participating. If you signed up for the drive but have not participated yet, it's not too late! Try to copy edit at least a few articles. Remember, if you have rollover words from the last drive, you will lose them if you do not participate in this drive. If you have not signed up for the drive yet, you can
sign up now. If you have questions about getting started, feel free to
talk to us. Many thanks to those editors who have been helping out at the
Requests page. We currently have 17 articles awaiting edit.
We are making slow progress on achieving our target of reducing the overall backlog by 15%; in order to accomplish this goal we will need to complete about 400 more articles. However, we are making good progress on the 2009 backlog, as we have eliminated over half of the articles from 2009 that were present at the start of the drive. Let's concentrate our fire power on the remaining months from 2009; leaderboard awards will be handed out for 2009 articles this drive. Thank you for participating in the May 2011 drive. We hope it will be another success! Your drive coordinators – S Masters ( talk), Diannaa ( Talk), Tea with toast, Chaosdruid, and Torchiest |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:58, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey. Saw your add on the adoption page and I am looking for someone to show me how to be a more active contributer and noticed you because you mentioned being active in the college football project and I am a huge college football fan and have a lot of random knowledge on the subject. I'm on Wikipedia all of the time, but I only make edits when I see vandalism or something small when I see incorrect information. This is due, not only to my ineptitude with HTML but also because I'm really just not very sure on what to do. Look forward to hearing from you. Mikist4 ( talk) 19:43, 15 May 2011 (UTC)mikist4
Thanks for the hello and links, especially to make new articles. I'm going to use that soon. I've run into some editors in circumcision who have questionable ethics. Any advice? Earthsales5 ( talk) 00:01, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors May 2011 backlog elimination drive report
Greetings from the
Guild of Copy Editors
May 2011 Backlog elimination drive. Thank you for participating!
![]() There were 63 signups for the drive; of these, 45 participated. Although we did not award a bonus for articles from the Requests page this drive, we are not experiencing lengthy delays in getting the articles processed. Many thanks to editors who have been helping out at the Requests page and by copy editing articles from the backlog.
During the month of May we reduced the backlog by approximately 10%, and made remarkable progress on eliminating articles tagged from 2009. There are now only 15 articles left, down from the 415 that were present when the drive started. Since our backlog drives began in May 2010 with 8,323 articles, we have cleared more than 54% of the backlog. A complete list of results and barnstars awarded can be found here. Barnstars will be distributed over the next week. If you enjoyed participating in our event, you may also like to join the Wikification drives, which are held on alternate months to our drives. Their June drive has started.
The six-month term for our first tranche of Guild coordinators will be expiring at the end of June. We will be accepting nominations for the second tranche of coordinators, who will also serve a six-month term. Nominations will open starting on June 5. For complete information, please have a look at the election page. Please feel free to contact any coordinator if you have any questions or need assistance. Your project coordinators are S Masters ( talk), Diannaa ( Talk), Tea with toast ( Talk), Chaosdruid ( talk), and Torchiest ( talk). |
Sent on behalf of the
Guild of Copy Editors using
AWB on 08:26, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Greetings from the
Guild of Copy Editors
The latest GOCE backlog elimination drive is under way! It began on 1 July and so far 18 people have signed up to help us reduce the number of articles in need of copyediting. This drive will give a 50% bonus for articles edited from the GOCE requests page. Although we have cleared the backlog of 2009 articles there are still 3,935 articles needing copyediting and any help, no matter how small, would be appreciated. We are appealing to all GOCE members, and any other editors who wish to participate, to come and help us reduce the number of articles needing copyediting, as well as the backlog of requests. If you have not signed up yet, why not take a look at the current signatories and help us by adding your name and copyediting a few articles. Barnstars will be given to anyone who edits more than 4,000 words, with special awards for the top 5 in the categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 09:33, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Invitation from the
Guild of Copy Editors
The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their September 2011 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy editing backlog. The drive will begin on September 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and will end on September 30 at 23:59 (UTC). We will be tracking the number of 2010 articles in the backlog, as we want to copy edit as many of those as possible. Please consider copy editing an article that was tagged in 2010. Barnstars will be given to anyone who edits more than 4,000 words, with special awards for the top 5 in the categories "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". See you at the drive! – Your drive coordinators: Diannaa, Chaosdruid, The Utahraptor, Slon02, and SMasters. |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 17:22, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
![]() New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Ute in DC! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:45, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
Ute, your opinions and votes are solicited at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#Season records tables, inclusion of AP, Coaches and BCS rankings, etc.. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 17:03, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Invitation from the
Guild of Copy Editors
The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their November 2011 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on November 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on November 30 at 23:59 (UTC). We will be tracking the number of 2010 articles (and specifically will be targeting the oldest three months), as we want to copy edit as many of these as possible. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Diannaa, Chaosdruid, The Utahraptor, Slon02, and SMasters. |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 02:52, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Hey Ute,
I need help. I'm looking to improve the Utah State University page, and I've put it up for Peer Review. Would you mind taking a look at it? I have been working a lot recently on some of the smaller USU pages (RCDE, Alumni) and if you see any improvements that can be made on those as well, I would appreciate hearing your thoughts. Thank you! Jhunt47 ( talk) 23:23, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Hey Ute, re: the "unexplained deletion of sourced material" on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Running_up_the_score#Wisconsin, I made the deletion because the statement "On November 13, 2010, the Wisconsin Badgers throttled the Indiana Hoosiers 83–20, drawing criticism from Indiana coach Bill Lynch. [10]" is clearly contradicted by the cited-to article, see:
"But one place the disapproval did not come from was the opponent. Indiana's head coach Bill Lynch put all the blame for Wisconsin's 83 points on his own team.
"I didn't have any problem," Lynch said in the Big Ten coaches' teleconference Tuesday. "I said it after the game, and I feel the same way now. I think it's our responsibility to stop them, and we didn't do a very good job of that. And we didn't take care of the ball. … That's on us.'" Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.90.144.23 ( talk) 18:58, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
would you like to help me restore the series record to World's Largest Outdoor Cocktail Party in that case? I've tried to add the series record to that page and it gets reverted. editing wikipedia is useless if i'm just gonna be reverted, which is part of the reason i choose not to have an account — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.32.129.220 ( talk) 00:56, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Since you were interested in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#Rivalry articles, I feel you might have an interest in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#Rivalry navboxes. Basically, there are three issues. 1. Should we have rivalry navboxes for conferences; 2. Should we have a policy to make each conference's navbox include non-conference rivalries and/or non-football rivalries; 3. Should we have individual school rivalry navboxes.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 23:17, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
Greetings from the
Guild of Copy Editors
![]() Elections are currently underway for our third tranche of Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days: 00:01 UTC, 16 December – 23:59 UTC, 31 December. All GOCE members, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. There are five candidates vying for four positions. Your vote really matters! Cast your vote today. |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 11:39, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors 2011 Year-End Report
![]() We have reached the end of the year, and what a year it has been! The Guild of Copy Editors was full of activity, and we achieved numerous important milestones in 2011. Read all about these in the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report.
Get your copy of the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report here
On behalf of the Guild, we take this opportunity to wish you Season's Greetings and Happy New Year. We look forward to your support in 2012! – Your 2011 Coordinators: Diannaa (lead), The Utahraptor, and Slon02 and SMasters (emeritus). |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:36, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Jocelyn Lane |
You seem to be pretty sure of your facts,reverting the article on Jocelyn Lane to it's old state.Let me tell you something,I actually live with her since six years.And she is fed up with the bullshit people keep writing,and copying from each other about her.
So instead of just deleting a correction of an untrue article of a living person you should probably try to find out which one is wrong and which one is right. There are TWO actresses by the name of Jackie Lane,they are both British.The Jackie Lane I'm referring to is Princess Jackie von Hohenlohe,Ex wife of Prince Alfonso von Hohenlohe.She was born in London,England,May 16.1954.Her Mother was Princess Olga Vasilchikova and her Father was John Bolton.Her Sister Serena or Mara as she is called was also an actress.And Jackie lives in Tangier,Morocco at this moment.That's it. Even the photographs are wrong.Does nobody see that it's not the same woman on the photo's?I always thought the internet also serves to learn and discover stuff,but this is just too stupid,I'm dealing with idiots here.And now some ..... from Hicktown,U.S.A thinks he knows better...right.
Dlesaner ( talk) 03:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC) |
Invitation from the
Guild of Copy Editors
The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their March 2012 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on March 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on March 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goal for the drive will be to eliminate the remaining 2010 articles from the queue. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, Stfg, and Coordinator emeritus SMasters. 19:57, 20 February 2012 (UTC) To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |