As a matter of fact, English is my first language. I mistakenly interpreted the conjuncts as complements of "must," as opposed to constituents of the relative clause. I see now that the wording is ambiguous, and either form is correct. My apologies. -- Æk ( talk) 05:37, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Research & Branding Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eeekster ( talk) 01:59, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a
speedy deletion tag from
Research & Branding Group, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{
hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's
talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.
Eeekster (
talk) 04:35, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Vasily Protyvsih. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! -- LaraBot ( talk) 00:10, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
It is allowed to use Ukrainian sources (especially if there are no English sources available). — Mariah-Yulia • Talk to me! 15:44, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
What do you think of this poll placing Serhiy Tihipko in third position in the current presidential race?. I got a gut feeling that that can't be right... — Mariah-Yulia • Talk to me! 19:01, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
There is a big difference (and I stand by it):
-- JorgeGG ( talk) 22:34, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
I will except that. Plurality voting system and first-past-the-post are not one and the same. This needs clarification. A first past the post voting method can include multiple candidates each one crossing the line in order of the number of votes. eg in a three member constituency the three highest polling candidates are elected. Or you can have a exhaustive counting system where one candidate is elected at a time until the number of vacancies are filled. The main distinction is being the highest vote. Wikipedia need to separate first-past-the-post voting method from Plurality voting system. Ukr-Trident ( talk) 00:14, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
— Mariah-Yulia • Talk to me! 14:16, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
I want you to know I appreciate all the work you put into
Ukrainian presidential election, 2010. It's all parts of wikipedia that sometimes articles move into directions that sometimes look completely idiotic to you... but (not always do) after a while it does start to make sense. Because wikipedia is all virtual misunderstandings are likely to happen. However I do the best I can (my intends are not to make wikipedia a "Slava Yulia!" website
) to make "Ukrainian articles" of high encyclopaedic standards, I hope you forgive me if I sometimes mess up. —
Mariah-Yulia •
Talk to me! 17:03, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for all the work you put in - Dumelow ( talk) 11:08, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)