Hi Tvactorcreator! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Kj cheetham ( talk) 22:47, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. This refers to your edits of the page Laura Behrens Wu where you have removed content from a reliable external source.
Your edit to I Love You (2023 film) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:36, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Tony Delgado. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. signed, Rosguill talk 02:06, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex McCurry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
KH-1 ( talk) 04:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Tony Delgado (Entrepreneur), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:54, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anil Thadani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
BoraVoro ( talk) 07:40, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurvin Singh Dyal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Oaktree b ( talk) 02:05, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Confluent, Inc.. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. 2A00:23EE:16A8:C58:6836:22FF:FE30:62BD ( talk) 08:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello Tvactorcreator,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of Pakistani Dubbing Artists for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.
If you don't want List of Pakistani Dubbing Artists to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 16:58, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BharatPe, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BharatPe (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on ARDEA Foundation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel ( talk) 09:38, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
You wrote : "This article is created in 2006, but says 2015 show, and original release in infobox it says 2017"
In all suspicious cases you have to look into article history.
That said, I have no objection to deletion, but it must be handled by AfD. - Altenmann >talk 16:07, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi - have you ever edited under different accounts? And have you ever edited in an area where you have a conflict of interest? Thanks Girth Summit (blether) 12:14, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Tvactorcreator ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I don’t understand why I have been blocked where my contributions are in good faith only, I have been editing only towards New Pages Feed, where I mostly tag and correct if I can. If I my can you please tell me why I have been blocked ? Wikipedian ( talk) 13:01, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are blocked because you are believed to be violating WP:SOCK. Yamla ( talk) 13:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Tvactorcreator ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have expressed myself for unblocking me to checkusers above, thats all that I can say right now because I forgot about the one account I’m not being unblocked, but if u may please consider unblocking this account I will anyway not have to create and I will not create but idk why this genuinely looks like little harsh decision by CU as there’s already proven fact I didn’t use the accounts at the same time. Wikipedian ( talk) 14:15, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As Yamla says you used both accounts the same day. PhilKnight ( talk) 14:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
"proven fact I didn’t use the accounts at the same time", this too is a lie. Both accounts were substantially active on 2023-07-27. At this point, I recommend removing talk page access. This user is continuing to go out of their way to mislead us, even after being called on this. -- Yamla ( talk) 14:35, 24 August 2023 (UTC)