This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{ User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for helping out over at the helpdesk and good humor regarding "Terrible vocabulary and spellings". However, perhaps it might not have been the best idea to welcome them to edit the page. It was more than a little ironic that someone with such terrible spelling and grammar themselves, complain about spelling and grammar on another page. ;)
Happy holidays. Tiggerjay ( talk) 21:36, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi Triptothecottage, How are you?, I ask you please check the editions of users that put European fantasies in their countries, in Argentines of European descent, many users insert supposed migrations and false data, when the best studies indicate that the Argentines are mestizos, thanks and greetings from Mexico.-- Bleckter23 ( talk) 01:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Sorry for the situation with Bleckter23. He is a sockpuppet with a large history vandalizing pages and insulting users. He took advantage of my inactivity to pretend to be me. Greetings. -- Bleckter ( talk) 08:46, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Triptothecottage, you reverted my changes to the Fairphone page. But the changes made were an improvement imho. They claims under criticism section are not at all supported by the citations. To me it seems the criticism part was until my changes written by a disgruntled person who used Wikipedia to paint an unfair picture of the project. Please look at the links in the article and judge for yourself. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daividda ( talk • contribs) 09:22, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Hi Triptothecottage, thanks a lot for your action on that IP talk! I started an AN/E [1] but don't have enough time, also perhaps at another noticeboard, what do you think? -- .js 01:42, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas ( talk) 00:35, 20 January 2017 (UTC)Hello Triptothecottage,
My name is Kelsey Butts and I am the publicist for Nikki DuBose. I noticed that you deleted all of the info that I put on her wikipedia page. Can you please revert that? Thanks so much - I am not sure how to go about doing it any other way as it keeps getting deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brownbin87 ( talk • contribs) 19:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello Triptothecottage, I edited the bhapa page which you requested an explanation for the changes. I wanted to update that the Bhapa community is a well respected community of businessmen in the Sikh community. The article 'Bhapa' says the term is used in a 'pejorative' or negative sense. This is the view that racist few Sikhs hold - they say Bhapa in a negative way, whereas us majority of Sikhs see it not as pejorative but as a respectful title like businessman-sir, so please delete the word pejorative and write sir if you could. Second, it says "Jats mostly make fun of Bhapas dressing style like wearing a cloth on beard and using beard sprays'.. what in the world? I am a Jatt Sikh of the Randhawa clan, which is the highest and oldest, and most respected of all Jatt clans. We do not make fun of Bhapas dressing styles or any beard spray or make fun of their language for we speak the same language Punjabi. This is utter racism against our brothers from some racist writer :'( I am terrified to think a Bhapa child would check what their ethnic-subgroup name means, and they see their Jat brothers and kinsmen... it says we make fun of them? No! It is untrue. Finally, it also says 'the term has been used as a royal title in some regions of India, and the best known king was Bappa Rawal, founder of the Guhilot dynasty. This title is 'Buppa' and is a hindu dynasty, it has nothing to do with the Sikh group Bhapas. It is not the same lineage or pronounciation as Bhapa is Bhaapa, and Bappa is Bup-pah is completely different. Please remove that if you can. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.71.199.60 ( talk) 09:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
… is now listed at WP:CP for copyright evaluation. Please, please, check for copyvio before moving pages to mainspace. You clearly saw something wrong, because you placed a "tone" tag – that was your cue to see if the unencyclopaedic text came from elsewhere (which of course it did). If in any doubt, please leave the draft for someone else to evaluate – there's no rush! Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 09:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
KOF Index of Globalization has been deleted. Primefac ( talk) 13:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
@ Primefac: Thanks! Triptothecottage ( talk) 03:54, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello Triptothecottage,
You recently evaluated my submission on the wikipedia article page "Falcon's Creative Group." Thank you for your time! I was wondering if you could provide a bit more clarity on your comment "Most of the references that have been added appear to be very much incidental coverage - none of them are in-depth coverage of the company itself."
I've taken a look at what was sourced and I agree, the page could use more in-depth coverage sources. However, I wanted to just check and see if this was the only concern. There are more notable mentions of the company that I will look into, but I just wanted to make sure that there was nothing else significant before I resubmit. Also, do you have any examples or specifics that you think would count as a notable submission. I understand that Wikipedia has a page on this and I have read it, but I have also been referencing other Wikipedia pages that have been approved and what sources they use and many of their sources are around the same legitamacy as the ones used on this page.
I am not questioning or antagonizing your comment, I just want to make sure I have all the information needed to try and improve the page for a more successful resubmission.
Thanks!
Dear Triptothecottage, why do say I'm vandalizing Wkipedia ? I'm a scholar, specialist of Cambodian literature. I think you are to fast. Please have a look on the page. I wrote it all !! With best regards, Domrey sar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Domrey sar ( talk • contribs) 04:44, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Dear Triptothecottage, I am the one who wrote the text ! I'm a specialist of Khmer literature. My work was published first in a french magazine "Revue Europe" in 2003 and then translated into english in "manoa journal " (Muse) in 2004. Could you help me to remove this "Investigation of potential copyright issue" please. It's to complicated for me. The same happened with "Hak Chhay Hok" one hour ago, I received a warning about "biography of living persons" and the writer is dead during Pol Pot!! I'm quite tired and sad. I spent hours and hours to write in wikipedia about Khmer Writers. I think I will stop doing it. Domrey sar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Domrey sar ( talk • contribs) 08:59, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Dear Triptothecottage, your are very "formal". When people are very "formal", sometimes it's because there are very "personal". Maybe it's because I wrote to you "why do you say I'm vandalizing Wkipedia ? I think you are to fast. Please have a look on the page." And you decided to look with A LOT OF ATTENTION ! You know I was not vandalizing Wikipedia. You know I'm doing my best to write in Reviews, Literary, Journal, and now in Wikipedia in order to promote the work of Cambodian writers (95% of them died during Pol Pot's Regime) You know it will be "a bit complicated and tedious" to resolve this copyright problem. You don't want to help me. Domrey sar ( talk) 09:46, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of KOF Index of Globalization at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mifter ( talk) 05:50, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Which part was deflamatory?
I wrote with the correct supporting sources, good and reliable references. Furthermore I said "Chinese Audience" attributed her success due to that relationship, I was merely doing translation of the sources.
What's wrong? Are you a fan of Jing Tian? Why are you abusing your authorithy?
Brazilian Tiger ( talk) 08:00, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
No reply?
Please do not abuse your authorithy to defend your idol. Thanks. =)
Brazilian Tiger ( talk) 11:56, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi you recently reviewed my proposed page BBC Children's and suggested I visited this page and made it better
CBBC - I'm happy to do this and I think it's a good suggestion. I have made a start. I think the page should be renamed BBC Children's so not to be confused with
CBBC_(TV_channel)which is actually a better explanation of CBBC as it currently is today. BBC Children's is the department that manages the two TV channels CBBC and CBeebies and I improving the
CBBC page to explain it covers these two services and to clarify how it came about. Can you help me rename the page please if you agree?
Neneway (
talk) 11:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Dealing with your question about conflict of interest I can disclose I worked for this organisation some years ago. I consider myself a Subject-matter expert making Assume Good Faith edits but happy to read your view on whether I should request the changes for other people to make instead. I note that there is a WikiProject for the BBC pages. Are you a member of WikiProject_BBC? I will also make my suggestions for these changes to them if not. Neneway ( talk) 09:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello Triptothecottage,
The edit in question which prompted you to contact me was a hyper link to the town of Westport, Mayo, Ireland being the birthplace of my gg grandmother, Mary Campbell (nee Hanley). Further, re: copyright, if you noticed I provided information to the Qld Parliament in the first instance re: my gg grandfather, Thomas Campbell, and therefore it does not or should not fall within the definition of breach (of Wiki copyright). Accordingly, it would be greatly appreciated if you lift the current status of Thomas's Wiki page (eg. it is blocked or the like).
Thank you. Kind regards,
bwsg70 25/2/2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwsg70 ( talk • contribs) 11:57, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Please refer to this discussion. El_C 13:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
I do have a verifiable citation thank you very much. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1329668/quotes?item=qt1453399 Now for a very swift apology or I will be writing you up a citation. Quickly now — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.188.4.79 ( talk) 19:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm writing in to ask, what do you meant by my page is still not coming from a neutral point of view? As i have footnote all from third party website.
I need more details, Thank you.
Dinghanliang ( talk) 02:26, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Triptothecottage. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! – Juliancolton | Talk 04:01, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Just an FYI, WP:BLPPROD requires that there be no sources, broadly construed, when the tag is placed. Even if the source is not reliable, if it exists in the article, BLP PROD cannot be placed. TonyBallioni ( talk) 00:07, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your review of the Marsh-Warthen House draft. I am attempting to merge with an existing earlier article which is many years old and very incomplete. I knew the authors at the time. They were consultants in the restoration process in starting the house museum. I think they have retired, but I would welcome their input. I have been involved with the project since the beginning and and still involved. ( DavidPatBoyle ( talk) 17:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Power management keys. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 04:32, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello Triptothecottage. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Late Paravur Sadanandan Pillai, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: bad English aside, the article claims the significance of the subject and a quick GBooks search confirms there might be coverage. Thank you. So Why 13:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
I told you I cannot work this talk thing out so only know how to do a new section and not how to continue on a thread.
Anyway, I have no idea who you are but let me explain.
Firstly, if something is written about someone that is inaccurate then it can be and absolutely should be corrected and if not then that person can and really should sue. Nothing should be published in the first place if the person who wrote it hasn’t checked their facts. It says on the edit that you should not solely rely on newspaper sources as they are not a given for necessarily being correct.
It is quite absurd to say that the person who it is written about cannot be the one to correct inaccuracies as they are the very people that can and absolutely should. For example, you say I was 11 when moved NO I was 10. FACT! You wrongly call me an environmental activist yet I am not and have never named myself as such as I am a multi award winning campaigner and registered journalist. FACT! You have also misrepresented the references to the health problems and made some inaccurate comments there as well which I will not stand for. The person who knows these correct facts is of course me or can I not point out such inaccuracies as I have a conflict of interest!!! What a farce. Put it this way if I wrote a page about you and made up all sorts of rubbish about your age, your job title, your health problems etc. and then you knew it was wrong and so wanted it corrected and I said no because you are not allowed to point out the correct facts here, can you not see how totally ludicrous that is.
Also you say it cannot be included that there is a petition as it is not sourced. Well apart from the fact that the person who wrote it is informing you then you can take your pick of which links you want to include for that or is it only reliable if it appears in the Guardian? In fact I tried to put in the link to the petition (which would be an independent website to me) but it would not let me and so had to just refer to it being on my website.
I am simply bemused as to how someone can come along who knows nothing about me and my campaign and work and who clearly does not know the facts and just takes his or her info from newspaper articles! I know from direct experience that newspaper articles don't always get it right and it was one of the reasons I became a journalist myself because of inaccuracies in some of the media reporting.
As said previously, I have already informed Wikipedia in an email that I will not and never had stood for factual inaccuracy in any aspect of my work. If the various changes I have made and quite rightly so to correct the inaccuracies and misrepresentation continue to be deleted then I shall have no choice but to take this further and will need to find out about legal complaints.
I am not sure what part of the world you are in but here in the UK it is nearly 6am and seeing as I have wasted a number of hours on all this and already had enough important work to do to try and protect the health of the people the campaign represents then I am now going to sleep. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefactcorrecter ( talk • contribs) 04:54, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
I know for a fact you have various things wrong in what you have written on the Georgina Downs page. You also appear to be intent on playing down the campaign referred to, for example, where is the usual link to the website of the campaign, as such websites would usually always appear in the Wikipedia pages of others profiled.
I really cannot get this talk thing to work and it has taken me an hour or so to type this much. Therefore I want to email the points to you regarding this piece. In any event I have emailed Wikipedia direct to point out the seriousness of having inaccuracies about a person in any of Wikipedia's pages as it is not acceptable and a person can obviously take it further legally if inaccuracies and misrepresentations are not corrected when pointed out.
Please can you let me know your email as I can forward you the email I sent directly to Wikipedia. Thanks.
Thefactcorrecter ( talk) 04:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello Triptothecottage. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various
deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at
page reviewer talk.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Swarm ♠ 15:30, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi! Was hoping you could elaborate more on your criticisms, which by the way are much appreciated! 1. Could you be a little more specific on the areas where you feel it is too promotional? 2. Also, what other types of sources would you consider "helpful", and helpful to which aspect of the article(notability or neutrality?) I've deliberately avoided press releases and focused more on scouring industry-targeted publications, unless even those are not considered neutral enough. Thanks and best regards! BobbleheadSockPup ( talk) 01:53, 19 April 2017 (UTC)Bobbleheadsockpup
Hello Triptothecottage, apologies if this is not formatted correctly but im trying my best! And no worries at all, your worries arecompletely understandable :) Re:username: Absolutely not a sockpuppet of anybody. My desk has many bobblehead figurines (im a collector) and i just watched an episode of Mr Robots on sockpuppets and put them together. I had absolutely no idea Bobblehead was a user. Oh dear, i think i should change my username. Conflict: Not being paid, no conflict of interest. Just a regular civilian with an interest in the project. Just decided to take on a relatively easy writeup to start.
On the article: Agreed on the services section, I had a feeling that this section might be problematic in spite of my best efforts. Will relook them. Are there any other areas you are concerned with?
BobbleheadSockPup ( talk) 02:59, 19 April 2017 (UTC)Bobbleheadsockpup
You have deleted my start with no opportunity to appeal your deletion. The company has been granted a market license by the Australian government so I fail to see how you could claim invalid or not able to be verified Bin Prince ( talk) 12:19, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
@ Bin Prince: I agree with you that a government regulation website is a reliable source, and it is perhaps my fault for not explaining very how that fitted your situation. Every article on Wikipedia should pass what is called the General Notability Guideline, which says that the subjects of Wikipedia articles have to have significant coverage in multiple sources independent of the subject. So, the regulator's statement, which I've found ( [2]) is reliable and independent, sure, but it's only one source, so it's not multiple, and it's hardly significant coverage because it only tells me that the company exists and it has a licence to operate an energy market. It doesn't tell me anything about the company itself, who runs it, its history, etc, etc. If, for example, you could find two in-depth newspaper profiles of the company in addition to the regulator's statement, that would probably confirm its notability. So, I'll point out to you again that you can create your article via Articles for Creation, develop it, get feedback on it, and when it is ready, it can be accepted into the encyclopaedia. Certainly, it is a little more effort, but because Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, we have to create standards for what we do and do not accept. If you wish to go ahead with this process, and have any questions, feel free to ask. Triptothecottage ( talk) 04:10, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
So i tagged because there was not reliable source in it.It seemed as if it had been for promotion.— Adnan Enaya Afzal talk 12:31, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for voicing your concerns; I'm not connected with Gorillaz, Damon Albarn, or any of their affiliate projects in any way, I just decided to make a proper account to fix up a few Gorillaz articles as a fan. Regarding Humanz Tour 2017:
Thank you for posting concern about the article created, the information given here does seem to be indiscriminate, since this is my first article, I am definitely open to any adjustments to the article. If you can explain what you mean by not meeting the criteria for inclusion, I will be happy to fix it. PacoTac0 ( talk) 12:06, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi there. A user is asking for feedback / explanation about tags you placed on this article, please take a look and respond as needed. Regards So Why 11:48, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
here are some links where pepole use fryed insted of fried [1] Southern Fryed Chicken in enland [2] google trends in fryed chicken [3] Thank You for doing the review And a telling me why
Jacktime34 ( talk) 23:33, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
References
I just learned u reviewed the page Causes of Islamic Terrorism and redirected it to Islamic terrorism . I believe those reason is so much important and a separate page is needed for detail observation . Where i witnessed day by day many Muslims taking the path of destruction and claiming its the Islam or they way of life . Its also killing many innocent lives , non Muslims or Muslims . Only the right information can stop a suicide bomber not gor for a blast . So its our duty to put those information in web in a proper way . The page was under developed And i promise its will help Muslims to stop supporting the extremism . So please dont redirect , and you can look after the page after some day . I promise the page will be resourceful . If than Its dont carry the rules of Wikipedia you can do anything . So I hope you will reconsider your decisions for the greater purpose of the page . After submitting my topic i am seeing link after my name - some marketing - those links are not my doing Aziz Tarak.
Thanks for bringing to my attention the copyright infringement on this page when writing the history. The page I was referencing was very well written and had a good history of the competition. I have had a go at re-write the history to "put it in my own words" and hope this avoids the need for the page to be deleted. If possible it would be good to get the warning removed from the page. NZ Footballs Conscience ( talk) 00:02, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi.
I see you have deleted my adding about this serie in March.
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=The_Virginian_(TV_series)&diff=771500566&oldid=771500441
You reason was, I quote you:
"Unnecessary and unsourced information"
Are you seriously asking people to source everything? Because dear collegue, in that case we must source each sentence we wrote about any article if we go like that!!!
Do you think that when I add "DVD contains only english audio and no close captions nor any subtitles." is a statement which deserves to be sourced? Because I'm afraid that thousands of wikipedia pages which have such information without any source must all be edited by you at once. And who are you to declare that this VALUABLE information is unnecessary? Please think 1 minute about your statement "unnecessary". Again who are you to declare that? Are you aware that planet earth is made of a lot of countries which do not have english as primary language? Do you know that many people are not fluent in english to be able to follow an english talk? Are you aware that even among english native people some are deaf/hearing impaired and do not hear anything and are REALLY interested to know if the DVD/Bluray they are about to buy contains closed captions/subtitles?
Sorry to be a bit tough but such valuable information, in the specific DVD section is all but unnecessary. I'm amazed, if not shocked, to see moderators moderating anything, even the smallest sentence, because to their eyes, this add nothing and would not be sourced. But please come on, type "The Virginian dvd closed captions" in google and see what you get. You want people to source what is available in 2 seconds?
And what irritates me at the utmost in this story is that you reproach me this unnecessary and unsourced sentence BUT at the VERY SAME TIME, what do you read in the VERY SAME section (DVD Releases) ONE LIVE ABOVE, I copy paste:
"The release is presented with original English audio with German subtitles, as well as a German-dubbed soundtrack."
So this sentence was already here for months or years for the german DVD, WITHOUT SOURCE, then myself I add the information for the English DVD version, suddenly my add is unnecessary and unsourced.
This is what irritates me A LOT. To be a moderator does NOT mean you must moderate at all cost, especially when 1 line, I mean ONE LINE above mine, there are similar information. Information VERY VALUABLE for ALL PEOPLE around the world, not fluent in english or deaf/hearing impaired.
Best Regards. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2A01:CB00:349:3200:5CA7:6CC0:78F2:6553 (
talk) 20:12, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. While it probably was a touch unfair to call the information "unnecessary", it was certainly true that it was "unsourced". Everything on Wikipedia must be verifiable by reliable sources, and if that means a citation for every sentence, so be it. Original research, which is when you add information that you have personally worked out, is not allowed. In other words, if you have a source, feel free to add the information. Triptothecottage ( talk) 21:27, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Citadel of Ricks: Hi, my past is not a hoax or vandalism. It is a fictional tv show. If you could message my FaceBook at Blake Gale with the Ranma picture, that would great, thank you! — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Blakegale (
talk •
contribs) 23:30, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, could you look at the sources for this and let me know if they mention the subject or his band, EUPHONY OFFICIAL? I don't think they do, but was going blind from fatigue. If they do not so mention, please let me know. thanks, Dlohcierekim ( talk) 04:07, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Why did you tag this article with attack?. Lil Johnny ( talk) ( contribs) 04:10, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 811 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!
But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.
Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello Triptothecottage. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Amy Mali Hicks, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Please give them more than two minutes to assert notability -- there are already two sources. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:47, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello! This page should not be speedily deleted because it has been added to enrich this encyclopedia which will benefit the readers worldwide. There is nothing obnoxious or wrong in this article and the rules of wikipedia has been followed. It does not promote any person, organization etc. It is about world's first massive open online interships academy which provide free platform and free access to internships to high school students worldwide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saumesh Sahar ( talk • contribs) 23:36, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen328 Let's discuss it 21:36, 23 July 2017 (UTC) |
Sorry Trip to the cottage, it was a complete accident. But I would please ask you to reconsider again on the deletion of Benjamin Smith Deputy Leader of the Welsh Green Party. He's an up and coming politician and being made a deputy leader at 19, surely shows he'll do great things. Thank you ( Onceinablue ( talk) 07:42, 29 July 2017 (UTC))
Hey Triptothecottage,
Any tips on how I can go about getting Practice Ignition published? It took me a long time to get that page together and learning the Wiki syntax.
I didn't mean to hide anything - I do work for Practice Ignition. It's a real company with over $6 million in funding and is making waves in the accounting world.
Let me know what I can do!
Sorry, and thanks for catching this - I accidentally deleted the wrong template. I meant to delete the Celts template, as it has little or nothing to do with the content of the Feis article. Hohenloh + 12:15, 16 August 2017 (UTC) @ Hohenloh: No worries – appreciate your efforts! Triptothecottage ( talk) 22:45, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello Triptothecottage, I am here to see if you have any suggestions as to how I can make my article better fit Wikipedia's guidelines. It is not a promotion, and definitely not a disambiguous one. I believe that it is significant, as do many others. Any suggestions you can give to help me to get this page up to standards would be greatly appreciated. Cheers. Reidsome ( talk) 03:51, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Triptothecottage, thanks for creating 2017 National League Wild Card Game!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources. If the 'external links' are actually sources, please make this clear in the article.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn ( talk) 19:27, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, Triptothecottage. Best wishes, Boleyn ( talk) 05:15, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
I like your improvements to Irish stepdance, though I have one little nit to pick. You mention that bubble heels were banned, but it's not clear that heel clicks remain a significant part of competition stepdance since then. Also, were heel clicks actually unknown before fiberglass heels? I have a pair of non-irish-dance shoes with leather heels which produce an audible click, though not nearly as loud as my Irish step shoes. And was wood never used to make heels more audible? Argyriou (talk) 15:32, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- Thibbs ( talk) 13:16, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
On 25 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article St Collins Lane, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the St Collins Lane luxury shopping centre replaced a building considered one of Melbourne's worst? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/St Collins Lane. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, St Collins Lane), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih Talk 00:02, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Moors. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
You didn't get a response, but Talk:Railways in Melbourne may be one place to find out what is appropriate. As for whether a certain procedure should be followed on articles in general, maybe WP:VPM.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:14, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters. Legobot ( talk) 04:33, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:White. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Username policy. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains. Legobot ( talk) 04:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi Triptothecottage. First of all, thank you for your work on this amazing platform. Second, I wanted to check in with you regarding my articles, which you have declined. The given reason was that I used press releases. The fact is, none of the sources are press releases nor are they controlled by the subject of the article. All of the sources are from independent news channels or organizations. I hope that this is proof enough that my article is not at all meant as advertisement. I am a firm believer in Wikipedia and would never want to clog it up with a useless article. I look forward to hearing back from you. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Ajmeldem (
talk •
contribs) 19:55, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your help on Confusion network! Mavaddat ( talk) 01:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Linking. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 13 November 2017 (UTC)