A tag has been placed on Image:LastAlliance AlwaysinMyHeart.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:LastAlliance AlwaysinMyHeart.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
DARTH PANDA
duel 23:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Image:LastAlliance MeandYourBorderline.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:LastAlliance MeandYourBorderline.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
DARTH PANDA
duel 23:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Image:LastAlliance TearsLibrary.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:LastAlliance TearsLibrary.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
DARTH PANDA
duel 23:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Image:LastAlliance TheSum.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:LastAlliance TheSum.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
DARTH PANDA
duel 23:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Image:LastAlliance UndergroundBlue.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:LastAlliance UndergroundBlue.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
DARTH PANDA
duel 23:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Oh, dear, I didn't realise I was the cause of so much mirth! Thanks! Ecoleetage ( talk) 23:30, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Get on IRC please? - NuclearWarfare contact me My work 23:44, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Ideally those infoboxes would be present in articles on their respective albums, accompanied by sale info, reviews, production notes, etc.. Even better would be a separate discography article or section that details the band's release catalog. Unfortunately, as your tags prove, the article is currently in poor shape. Taking away content that will prove useful in future expansion (& in accordance with the guidelines set forth in WP:MUSTARD) seems counterproductive. Eventually another editor will have to recreate these infoboxes and re-upload the accompanying images. Let's dismiss the vain urge of immediatism and allow the wiki process some time to fix up and break up/properly format this article. Sadly, I don't have the time to do so myself, nor am I familiar with the band's history. ˉˉ anetode ╦╩ 06:24, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Darth Panda
Thank you for your help in assessing the articles. A few suggestions, some of which may save you a lot of time:
Hope this helps,
Regards, G.A.S talk 06:09, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
David
WS
(contribs) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Happy holidays! David WS (contribs) 19:47, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
|
|
Special thanks go out to Wizardman and Malinaccier for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board. Thanks again for the trust the community has placed in me. A special Christmas song for you all can be found at the right hand side of this message! |
Bringing an FLRC over one concern is frankly overblown and annoying. I will work towards addressing the summaries issue, but this is something that could be solved over a discussion on the talk page. FLRC is for lists with serious issues. Be more circumspect in the future. I'd recommend you withdraw the FLRC. — sephiroth bcr ( converse) 01:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
The guidelines for Wikipedia:Peer review ask that editors nominate no more than one article per day (and four total at any one time). While the rules say that one of the requests can be removed, I will let it slide since this is the first time. Take care, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 04:26, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
|
Merry Christmas! | |
Christmas, and here's also hoping that all your family and friends are well. Lets all hope that the year coming will be a good one! If we've had disputes in the past, I hold no grudges, especially at such a time as this. If you don't know I am, I apologise, feel free to remove this from your page. Come and say hi, I won't bite, I swear! It could even be good for me, you know - I'm feeling a little down at the moment with all of these snowmen giving me the cold shoulder :( — neur ho ho ho (talk) 00:02, 25 December 2008 (UTC) | Town of Cats, here's hoping you're having a wonderful
Do you think this is ready enough to move to mainspace? An article on Daniel St. Piere. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:58, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Copying the structure of my menu is fine, but having the exact same images is a bit much. Have a bit of originality. There are a ton of options on Commons. — sephiroth bcr ( converse) 17:00, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Wish you a happy new year.My apologies that I did not reply at once to you. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 19:38, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
You are great,cool and consistent in all aspects of your editing Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 19:38, 31 December 2008 (UTC) |
Hi there; a request, if you would. Clearly we want to welcome new users, and I could not criticise your doing so. but could I ask you to consider the various wiki policies regarding usenames? You recently welcomed user:Poopypants9000. I have just given him a username block. Please, if you choose to welcome new users with dodgy usernames (this user has already vandalised) could you also query their username with them? {{ usernameconcern}} is a helpful template. -- Anthony.bradbury "talk" 20:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Happy New Year! | ||
Hey there, Town of Cats! Happy new
Gregorian year. All the best for the new year, both towards you and your family and friends too. I know that I am the only person lonely enough to be running this thing as the new year is ushered in, but meh, what are you going to do. I like to keep my templated messages in a satisfactorily melancholy tone. ;)
Congratulations to Coren, Wizardman, Vassyana, Carcharoth, Jayvdb, Casliber, Risker, Roger Davies, Cool Hand Luke and Rlevse, who were all appointed to the Arbitration Committee after the ArbCom elections. I am sure I am but a voice of many when I say I trust the aforementioned users to improve the committee, each in their own way, as listed within their respective election statements. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to update the 2009 article, heh. |
Would you like to join the Koei Warriors Games WikiProject? It is everything Dynasty Warriors, Samurai Warriors, and Warriors Orochi! To participate, add your name to the list of participants and apply {{ User WPKoeiWarriors}} to your user page.
If you are not sure what a WikiProject is, it is a club of Wikipedians interested in the WikiProject's subject and helping to improve articles of or related to that subject. I saw you greatly contributed to the Samurai Warriors article, so I figured I'd ask if you wanted to participate in Wikipedia:Wikiproject/Koei Warriors Games. You do not have to, and neither are you obliged; I am just asking. - BlueCaper ( talk) 23:28, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Did you not even read my explanation for changing. Pepsi HAS to change all flavors to match the current logo, or the line wouldn't match. People will look at the flavors and wonder when they are going to acquire the new design. The point is that all designs match, all right? That means that if Pepsi redesigns with lowercase font, all versions do. Otherwise an old one still in use with capitilized letters wouldn't fit in, that means match the others, and people would not be happy with that. Now I'm going to undo your change and you won't change it back, will you? Okay, great thanks. Please respond. Bob-- 99.145.232.61 ( talk) 01:14, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
The person at this IP, 99.235.109.172, has been constantly re-adding incorrect info to the article List of commercial games released as freeware, about MechCommander 2. It's been already discussed on the talk page the reasons why this info is incorrect. He keeps on re-adding it with no explanation whatsoever. It looks like it may become an edit war. I'm not sure who is the right person to inform about this? As I've seen you undoing some of his edits, do you know the correct procedure here? Any admin I should inform? Wait a little more to see what happens? I'm not sure if it makes sense talking in an IP Talk Page. Thanks! -- Sega381 ( talk) 03:26, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
I don't quite agree with your rationale that "it's not spam" and "can be improved" (with what?). I am going to AFD on this. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esenthel Engine. No hard feelings; I just disagree. Thank you, MuZemike 06:16, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I was using the Anti-Vandal tool for spelling and I accidentally clicked revert. Sorry for any inconvienience. manadude2 ( talk) 12:44, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, I usually don't copy-edit series I'm not familiar with, especially plot summaries in which I usually take great care to ensure that there's no undue weight. — sephiroth bcr ( converse) 11:22, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Please forgive the spam but since Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Itsmejudith is heading toward a very close decision, I'm contacting all editors who were in the "Neutral" section in the hope that they can take a second look at the RfA and make a more explicit recommendation (either way). Thank you, Pascal.Tesson ( talk) 18:27, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
|
|
Thank you for your participation in
my recent RfA, which failed with 90/38/3; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral.
Special thanks go out to Moreschi, Dougweller and Frank for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board. Thanks again for your participation. I am currently concentrating my efforts on the Wikification WikiProject. It's fun! Please visit the project and wikify a few articles to help clear the backlog. If you can recruit some more participants, then even better. Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Itsmejudith ( talk), 22:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC) |
Denbot ( talk) 22:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
I've asked for semi-protection - then I think we'll have to go some way back to get an unvandalised version. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 14:59, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For all your hard work reverting vandalism, (in which you beat me to it most of the time.) :) lol. Keep it up! astatine -210 discovered elements, what am I? 15:02, 30 January 2009 (UTC) |
He being under investigation is not vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cloud8a ( talk • contribs) 16:29, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
Regarding my previous post editing Matt Corker,
You have, for want of a better word, rejected my post.
Please note, I happen to be good friends with his cousin Shaun Kerr and there is nothing in this which isn't the truth.
All information in this post is accurate and may be interesting to people that wish to read about Matt Corker.
If you require more evidence then please advise as I can quite easily facilitate.
I suggest you rethink your rejection of my post.
Yours faithfully,
Scott G. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottygriff ( talk • contribs) 01:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
How do you think I would do in a RfA right now? astatine -210 discovered elements, what am I? 20:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
You can drop all the TB's you want on my page. It helps me and I'll put them in a colappse box. astatine -210 discovered elements, what am I? 14:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
I edited Michigan State University College of Engineering to make it less promotional. It should be okay now. -- Eastmain ( talk) 23:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello
I amended this part of the page , which you have reverted. I probably did not make it clear why i made the change.
On the site it says:-
"With such a simple system, there are not many areas to fault, however, the website does have flaws, that have been pointed out on numerous websites. For example, the Computing Studies section has been criticised for being out of date. Similarly, it has been argued that the crass use of irritating kitcsh piranhas is patronizing and unaesthetically appealing."
It uses this sites as a reference http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/02/06/bitesize_gcse/
But this site only criticises ICT and makes no reference to "irritating kitcsh piranhas". I think this might be one persons point of view. But as i work for the BBC i thought it best just make it clear that the second criticism had no references. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
132.185.144.122 (
talk) 14:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Don't forget to use: {{db-blanked}}, for instance at Craig edwards, cheers Spitfire Tally-ho! 14:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Thx. Is it ok now ? Al Maghi ( talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 21:27, 7 February 2009 (UTC).
Hey, see the talk page of the article. Thx... Phoenix of9 ( talk) 21:57, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
You're too fast for me! On behalf of all Wikipedia users, thank you for your contributions to help prevent vandalism! Ericdn ( talk) 22:42, 7 February 2009 (UTC) |
Sorry about the Music in yorkshire mess - please put me out of my misery and delete the offending item. -- Elen of the Roads ( talk) 01:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Your Bottage is Deconstructive to the human condition; if humanity wants chaos why are you letting a robot computer program correct that? 70.88.99.170 ( talk) 01:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
(BTW), I'm sorry to have troubled you with all of this, but I was having so much fun. =) 70.88.99.170 ( talk) 01:48, 10 February 2009 (UTC)