Colombia, during the Korean War, was indeed an allied of the United States but as the main purpose was to protect the country of South Korea and Colombia entered on behalf of the United Nations, South Korea should be the named country rather than the United States. This is how it's said in the anglophone countries, just in case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pipeafcr ( talk • contribs) 00:28, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Theryx7. I have declined your request to speedily delete the page Genesis Foundation, because the page does not meet either of the criteria you had listed - it is clearly not vandalism, nor is it excessively promotional. Please familiarise yourself with the speedy deletion criteria if you are going to tag pages for deletion. I see from your recent contributions that you appear to have some sort of vendetta against the Genesis Foundation; be advised that Wikipedia is not the place to fight ideological battles. Tendentious editing directed towards a particular person or entity may lead to a block being placed on your ability to edit here. Yunshui 雲 水 12:31, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
In this series of edits you seemed to have removed mention of a lot of food related subjects such as the coffee growers axis and subjects like enyucado. Please go through and restore those you have removed. Candleabracadabra ( talk) 14:27, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Regarding this edit [1] on the Afro-Latin American page, I recently did a review of most of these population figures and there were indications that the figure on the census might not be accurate - according to the Minority Rights Group (a group that regularly makes reports on minorities to worldwide governments and the UN): "This is 16% down from the government's previous estimations in 2002, which put the total Afro-descendant population at 26% and which is the figure still currently used by the United Nations. Census figures also continue to be disputed by Afro-descendant leaders such as Luis Giraldo Murillo Urritia, ex governor of the department of Choco, who claims that the Afro-Colombian population is as high as 36-40%" [2]
Given this I wasn't sure which figure to use, but eventually went with the higher CIA estimate which just as reliable, more recent, and seemed in line with the previous census and UN/independent estimates. I'm not going to insist on using the CIA figure but I thought I'd let you know in case you weren't aware that the 2005 census is generally seen as understating the real figure (presumably due to people with 3-way or Native American mixture choosing "Sin pertenencia étnica" or "Indígena" over the "Negro, mulato, afrocolombiano" option).
Tobus ( talk) 00:58, 21 January 2014 (UTC)