|
Glad you took up my invitation! Welcome!
Hi, The wub, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles that have been tagged for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated!
If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. And once again - Welcome! Ikip ( talk) 14:56, 2 May 2009 (UTC) |
The article that was here before was perfectly fine. The new one dumbs it down and gives the most false information about the movement. And if deletion was because it was "not notable"... I can tell you that Jerkin is a dance movement just like krumping. And in about 2 weeks there will be a music video airing MTV/VH1/BET/etc about the movement, and there is also a film in progress about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.90.191.141 ( talk) 03:19, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
hi, I noticed you were on the deletion logs for this page.. it seems to be salted. I'm not sure if you know but there has been some local coverage in the LA Weekly about this "trend", and it appears there is an interest in this article to exist. Can you restore the article so sources can be added and it can be brought up to standards? thanks riffic ( talk) 06:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
There's a backlog of closed discussions on Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Living people. The wubbot hasn't edited the page in two days, it seems. لenna vecia 23:13, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Is something wrong with the bot or what? It's not archived this page in around a week. We almost up to 300 AFDs on the page, which comes close to locking browsers. لenna vecia 04:17, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Yes, there are plenty of things wrong with the bot:
For now I replaced the page with the CatScan link, which has the same (better?) results with far less overhead. the wub "?!" 07:45, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Aaaand - further discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Deletion sorting#Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Living people. the wub "?!" 13:40, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Wubbot seemed to have problems archiving one section from Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Disambiguations:
Thought you might be able to debug, although if this is the only hiccup, it might be ignored. Cheers! -- JHunterJ ( talk) 12:16, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
I've over time noticed some delsort pages that are not getting archived. here, here, here and here are a few examples. There are others. It looks like you use User:The wubbot/delsortlist as your source for what pages to archive. Is it OK for others to edit this page? If so, is there anything else that needs to be done to get the archiving rolling on missed discussion pages? If you would rather others not edit the source list, would it be OK to provide you with a list of those I find not being archived and just let you handle it? - TexasAndroid ( talk) 17:57, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
It's been about a week since Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Academics_and_educators was archived. Is that related to this issue? Should I expect it to start up again soon or is more intervention needed? — David Eppstein ( talk) 16:31, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Starting discussion at Wikipedia:Meetup/Cambridge 4. Charles Matthews ( talk) 10:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
This has been closed a few days back, but wubbot doesn't appear to know that, as he has been on both WP:DSI and Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Social science to archive old discussions, but hasn't got his nose around this. Can you take a look? Thx - SpacemanSpiff ( talk) 16:12, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:Sci Fi Channel original films ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Sci Fi Pictures original films ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 02:15, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello wub, could you please close the above AfD, marking it "nominator withdrew the nomination"? The arguments brought forth, while they don't sway me very much (or "rock me like a hurricane," to stay genre-appropriate), make it seem clear that this article will be kept and there's no need taking up further space and time. Thanks! Drmies ( talk) 21:28, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
For the page revert. Saved me having to think of something witty to say back! :) – B.hotep • talk• 22:04, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
I do not understand your recent commnt on a statement by Lar:
Why do you want Lar to complain about ArbCom? Slrubenstein | Talk 09:35, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
How was it a reply to my comment? I never said that ArbCom does not consider advice from the community. What do you mean to be saying? Slrubenstein | Talk 10:14, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
FYI, the fourth Cambridge meetup will occur on the afternoon of Saturday 1 August. Charles Matthews ( talk) 14:04, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I have modified {{ afd top}} to allow discussions to be collapsed when transcluded in the log pages. Please see Template talk:Afd top#Proposal. (I am notifying you as requested in the documentation.) -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:08, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
A meetup is taking place in Manchester if you are interested. Majorly talk 18:48, 30 July 2009 (UTC)