Hi, I've started a thread at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Detailed tables of services for stations which directly concerns your recent edits. -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 08:14, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
It's being reported than an off-duty GMP officer was killed in the Manchester Arena bombing. I've started a thread on the list discussion page about whether to include her or not, and would appreciate your input. Nick Cooper ( talk) 13:58, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Yes. Firstly, where are you finding the mileage information for your changes to chains in articles. Secondly, again, what does this "downline" business add? Is it further the other way? Britmax ( talk) 14:20, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Why have you re-added the PROD tags? Did you not read WP:GEOFEAT, namely, "Artificial geographical features that are officially assigned the status of cultural heritage or national heritage, or of any other protected status on a national level and which verifiable information beyond simple statistics are available are presumed to be notable."
Also, the tag itself generates the following at the top of the article, "Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, do not replace it."
Please stop this WP:Edit warring immediately. Edwardx ( talk) 15:17, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
{{
proposed deletion/dated}}
tag; it's also clear that once such a tag has been removed, it must not be re-added except under a very few special circumstances. Consider
Old Doctor Butler's Head: since Edwardx did not blank the page, was not committing vandalism, and is not under a topic ban, then the two reverts by TBM10 were both improper. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk) 22:30, 6 July 2017 (UTC)I don't think adding petty roundels is clutter. One person's clutter is another's treasure. Have you checked out where such roundels are used? I have. I have to say stations such as Stratford are the main exponent of their use as have so many confusing criss-crossing lines to choose between. If you don't like the clear colour scheme then I suggest you complain to TFL.- Adam37 Talk 20:47, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi TBM10, sorry to bring this discussion here, but rather than entering into an edit war, I'd rather try and understand where our misunderstanding is.
In response to this edit of mine you made this edit with the summary: "it is in the prose, in the lead prose of the article, thanks". Well I simply cannot see any prose, let alone any referenced prose, stating that this incident is part of the "Islamic terrorism in Europe (2014–present)" campaign, and that is what we need to see to support the disputed statement in the infobox. Please quote for me the text you are referring to. -- DeFacto ( talk). 21:30, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Heathrow Express will continue to operate between London Paddington and Heathrow Terminal 2 and onto Heathrow Terminal 5.
All Heathrow Connect services will all transfer to TFL Rail.
There is currently a Heathrow Express shuttle between Terminal 2 and Terminal 4. This will also transfer over to TFL Rail. Mark999 ( talk) 18:57, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
I had previously moved Bittern Line and Wherry Lines to lowercase line, but then got talked into going with caps on those, as they seem to be unlike most of the others, being more like modern marketing trademarks, not line descriptions. So the train fans are likely to revert those recent moves of yours. But I appreciate the sentiment for consistency and following MOS:CAPS. Dicklyon ( talk) 05:37, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, TBM10. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I'm reverting your changes to the lead of Worle et al. While I accept the accuracy of your change, I initially had it using exact mileages but when I took it to WP:GAR I got told that using chains, a unit no one has ever heard of, in the lead was a bad idea. Frankly they're right (and indeed there is now a note in the articles I write which explains what a chain is the first time it's used). Also I think it's important to say a direction compared to Bristol, rather than "down the line" which, while jargonally correct, is a colloquial wolly phrase which does not give any useful geographic information. - mattbuck ( Talk) 16:19, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
|lk=in
to the {{
convert}}
template. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk) 22:59, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, you reverted a mistaken edit I did on Template:Circle line RDT [3] — thanks. I should have been editing the version I have in my sandbox where I am updating information using the excellent [4]. On the subject, though: I intend to remove the Crossrail components as they are nowhere intimately related to the Circle line; unlike Thameslink, Crossrail does not share or interact closely with the line at all. No other lines which are similarly unrelated are shown, other than by an icon at appropriate interchange stations. If this is to be a problem, best up front. Bazza ( talk) 12:22, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
On a related subject, I see you've removed repeated stations from Template:Circle line navbox. The service really does call at these stations twice. I think we should consider keeping at least Paddington tube station (Bakerloo, Circle and District lines), which is a separate station from the Paddington earlier in the list. Certes ( talk) 15:09, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Whilst I agree that work did commence on the infrastructural work on this proposed station, by the Great Eastern Railway at the turn of the 20th century, those works were ceased and the area was never in a condition to receive train services.
After the 1923 Amalgamations, this line became part of the London and North Eastern Railway. That company did look to opening a station on the site, but that came to naught.
Therefore, it is my contention that a fully-completed station named Crowlands was never operational on that site and therefore should not be described as such on the line template of the Great Eastern Railway Main Line,
Xenophon Philosopher ( talk) 19:27, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
There is a problem with edits like this - mileages on the GWR weren't measured from Paddington station. Indeed, Paddington itself is at 5 chains, this being the mileage of the buffer stops of platforms 9 & 10 (those of platforms 1-8 are at 6 chains; those of platforms 11 & 12 are 4 chains). I have been trying to find a reliable source which states where the zero point is: the two primary candidates are (i) the boundary of GWR property on the north-western side of Praed Street (i.e. the front of the Great Western Hotel, London); (ii) Praed Street Junction. Of these, (ii) is less likely because it was on Metropolitan Railway territory, being the junction between the Met's original 1863 line between Bishop's Road and Farringdon and its 1868 extension to South Kensington. -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 18:59, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
SovalValtos. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article,
Fishbourne railway station, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
SovalValtos (
talk) 10:06, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indhu Rubasingham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kilburn ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:24, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Jon Venables.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:29, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Robert Thompson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:51, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
I was wondering why you changed exact mi- ch to less-precise fractional mile distances? Useddenim ( talk) 21:18, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, TBM10. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The monument is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The monument until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thryduulf ( talk) 10:58, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Template:TfL Rail from May 2018 has been
nominated for merging with
Template:TfL Rail. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Pkbwcgs (
talk) 15:18, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi there. Without wishing to start on fisticuffs, I would love to know your rationale for all the changes from "City of London" to "London". Is this not a useful bit of extra detail? I'd always assumed so, but, clearly, YMMV. Cheers DBaK ( talk) 22:19, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Essex Police logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Rather than ask a bloody question in a revert edit summary, why don't you use the talk page? It sets the tone for any emerging discussion. As you've not bothered, I have, so I'd be keen to hear your thoughts. If you don't, ill take it you're ok with it and I'll revert back. Cassianto Talk 21:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darren Deadman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Spiderone 19:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article London Fire Brigade appliances, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Fire Brigade appliances until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
User:TBM10/Uncircumcised, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TBM10/Uncircumcised and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
User:TBM10/Uncircumcised during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Aasim (
talk) 11:21, 13 December 2021 (UTC)