This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, thanks for reverting the culture of greece article to correct edit, best regards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.237.95 ( talk • contribs)
You beat me too it :) SynergeticMaggot 21:50, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi there, I have restored the article and moved it to User:SynergeticMaggot/Hermeticism and other thought systems. I will leave the rest to you. See you around, Rje 23:33, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your support on my RfA. Give me shout if I can be of help. Thanks/ wangi 00:27, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Out of curiosity, where's the appropriate template for that kind of thing? I was hunting for it the other day on that Azeri-wedding-dance business but couldn't find the code. BigHaz 01:55, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello SynergeticMaggot. I have placed a backup of the page you requested at User:SynergeticMaggot/sandbox. Please feel free to move this somewhere else if you would like. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:40, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Please delete Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Patchouli. I wish to start anew.-- Patchouli 09:23, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
In response to your concerns about Croft No. 5, I added a link to the band's listing at the Danish folk festival where Croft No. 5 will be performing later this month. TruthbringerToronto ( Talk | contribs) 13:15, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Sorry SMaggot for this late reply. Yes, i did. Please close it. -- Szvest 15:20, 19 August 2006 (UTC) Wiki me up™
Hi SynergisticMaggot, just wanted to weigh in on this. I had closed this AfD a few hours before you did, for the same reasons as your own. I was asked by badlydrawnjeff to re-open, and I did: in my opinion, any time anyone asks for process to be completed on guideline closures (such as Speedy Keep), I think it's fair to complete the process. This isn't a commentary on your choice to close this (which followed my own thinking on this AfD), but is more out of respect for anyone who wants discussion to continue to completion. As such, I'm re-opening the above. As an aside, many thanks for helping with AfD, as you've helped us quite a bit with the backload. Cheers -- Samir धर्म 05:16, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
If you're here - your assistance is needed on #wikivoter if you can give it. Thanks M a rtinp23 20:41, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello again. Why was this closed early? -- badlydrawnjeff talk 01:26, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Take a look at this activity. Now, some of it may be justified, and I tried to inform Rosencomet about WP:BIO, but this reaction seems a bit overkill. I've fixed the articles that are clear keeps and/or did have sources or references, but I'd appreciate if you'd look through the mess to make sure I didn't miss something that I just don't know the importance of... — Hanuman Das 01:36, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Not sure where I was supposed to post it, you cleared out your page into an archive too fast for me to use that section to respond.....
But yes, I do want them wikified so I can work on them.
KV( Talk) 11:37, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Did you actually remove the fact that Thoth plays a large role in Hermeticism as OR?
KV( Talk) 11:49, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Closing something as a speedy keep really should be reserved for when there is obvious unanimity and where the AFD discussion is actually counterproductive. Remember: "Speedy" processes are for where a decision can be reliably made by just one, or two, people. We don't entrust decisions about notability, verifiability, and original research to just one or two people, for the simple reason that one or two pairs of eyes is not enough. Editors can miss things that other editors can find. There was disagreement at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boston, Ontario over the notability and verifiability of the place, and editors were doing research and discussing. There was no unanimity, and no reason to close the discussion early.
Also remember: The original point of "speedy keep" was to quickly deal with AFD nominations that were made in bad faith, in order to disrupt. It didn't come about as a mechanism for curtailing good faith discussion.
If you wish to help closing administrators, a far better way to do so is not to look for discussions to close early, but to provide detailed, well-researched, rationales for either keeping or deleting an article. It helps a closing administrator more to see a detailed argument based upon our policies and guidelines that has clearly been well researched than to see rationales such as " delete for good". Rationales are more important than the raw "keep"s and "delete"s. Closing administrators read all of the arguments and decide based upon our policies and guidelines. It is therefore a boon to them to see a good rationale. It doesn't help them at all to have rationales that are basically argument-free. See also Wikipedia:AfD Patrol. Uncle G 13:10, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Technically you can't close that as nom withdrawn because there is still one delete ( Daniel Case). However, I believe his reasoning is conditional, and warrents an exception. Good day! Computerjoe 's talk 15:14, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Barnstars aren't cool, so I'm giving you something different for an ability to keep your cool! -- Doc 19:41, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your note. I've left a response on my talk page. - MrFizyx 22:40, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Listen, you're officially on my last nerve now. If you're going to go around and taunt me like your most recent comment at the PROD WikiProject (which you only would have found by following me, from the looks of things), I will be forced to escalate this further. I've tried reasoning with you, and you were hostile. We tried the mediation, and you went and spoiled it. Is that what you want? It's like you're trying for it on purpose. I don't want to, but I don't want to be provoked by you any longer either. Back away from me and don't do anything else out of line, and I guarantee you won't hear from me directly again. If you're going to keep this up, though, I will request actual, serious intervention. This is my final statement on the matter. -- badlydrawnjeff talk 23:43, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
They really need to add a feature which enables one to ban people from one's talk page :-) — Hanuman Das 01:12, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
I noticed you removed the stubs from Cem Kaner. Given that this means I effectively took an article from zero to non-stub solo, I wanted to thank you for the vote of confidence, compliment, or whatever. And to think, I'd never heard of the guy until an hour before I started writing. ;-) -- KGF0 ( T | C ) 08:00, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Daniel Case did not change his vote. This is not a speedy keep. Please read the guideline. -- badlydrawnjeff talk 10:57, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Very clear speedy keep. Sources were provided, overriding the only objection, the nominator withdrew. Simple. -- kingboyk 12:17, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Wasn't saying you were, just trying to lighten the mood a bit...glad to see it worked. -- nae' blis 18:35, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Since you love removing anything that isn't fully 100% cited, I thought you might want to see this new addition: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ma%C3%A0t#Origin_of_name
KV( Talk) 16:18, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
It seems to be that this new category [1] duplicates folks this category [2] or is just plain pointless for lumping people from many different time periods together in one category. The category deletion policy is beyond my comprehension, so I thought I'd ask for help in figuring out whether or not it should be nominated to be deleted. Desertsky85451 18:38, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
If you mean following Wikipedia policy is proving a point? Well, yeah, I do support Wikipedia's policies. That's true. GBYork 18:47, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, all those subcats look extreme. I'd probably leave American and British and maybe ever French Freemasons, but let the supercat catch the rest... - 999 ( Talk) 20:06, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
File:Scarlettanager99.jpg | Hello, SynMag, and thank you for the support on my recent RfA. The final tally was 72/1/0, and I have now been entrusted with the mop. I'll be tentative with the new buttons for a while, and certainly welcome any and all feedback on how I might be able to use them to help the project. All the best, and thanks again! — Deville ( Talk) 00:33, 25 August 2006 (UTC) |
SynergeticMaggot for your Support! |
PS: YES YOU'RE RIGHT HARRY POTTER USES A BROOM! (BUT GOOD MOPS ARE HARD TO FIND!!)
Zos my good man, got a few things to tell you mate!! All good! :) See you on IRC, and thanks so ,much for the support mate - GIen 05:56, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Looks like K.V. is looking for a fight: Talk:Hermeticism and Category_talk:Hermeticism. — Hanuman Das 18:11, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks so much for your support on my RFA, which closed successfully this morning with a result of (64/3/3). I will be stepping lightly at first trying to make sure I don't mess up too badly using the tools. Any further advice/guidance will be gratefully accepted. I hope I will live up to your trust! NawlinWiki 11:50, 26 August 2006 (UTC) talk contribs |
My RfA video message | ||
Stephen B Streater 08:40, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
Thank you for your support of my RfA, which has passed with a final tally of 76/1/1. With this overwhelming show of support and approval I am honored to serve Wikipedia in the task charged to me and as outlined in my nomination. Happy editing to you! Teke ( talk) 17:11, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
I have nominated List of beat 'em ups to be undeleted, under the reasoning that it is not redundant to the category; it contains many games which are not covered by the category, and may never be able to be covered by it. In addition, the list can do more than the category. It can put date, developer, release date, system, et al., useful especially for articles that would be difficult to create an article for. I hope that you will vote on this and hopefully support its undeletion, on the basis that it does something that makes it not redundant to the category. [3] - A Link to the Past (talk) 22:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Could you add to your watchlist? We've got a "add a tiny bit of scripture with my personal interpretation thereof and call it cited" kind of guy, User:Green23. — Hanuman Das 02:24, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your support in my not-so-recent
RfA, which was successful with a an overwhelmingly flattering and deeply humbling total of 138/2/2 (putting me #10 on the RfA
WP:100). I guess
infinite monkey theorem has been officially proven. Chimps really can get somewhere on Wikipedia.
With new buttons come great responsibility, and I'll try my best to live up to your expectations. If you need assistance with something, don't hesitate to swing by my talk page or email me (trust me, I do respond :)). The same goes for any complaints or comments in regard to my administrative actions. Remember, I'm here for you. (Thanks go to Blnguyen for the incredible photo to the right.) alphaChimp laudare 01:21, 4 September 2006 (UTC) |
Do you have any knowledge of the tattvas in the western tradition? Or eastern for that matter, though I have that covered. The article that used to be there appears to have been a copyvio. Although there is a note claiming to have permission on the talk page, the article copied was completely unsuitable for WP, full of POV and original research, so I've started the article over. Check the old article for some possible references. I should probably move them to the talk page, but don't have time right now... — Hanuman Das 13:20, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
|
|
|
The Original Barnstar | ||
For your hardwork and dedication to making Wikipedia a better place. I, Sharkface217, award you this Original Barnstar. Good job! :-) Sharkface217 04:31, 1 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
What's happened to you? Long time no see. Let me know when you return. — Hanuman Das 05:34, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 47 | 20 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:50, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 48 | 27 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 01:59, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Zos. Tell me a little more about the Kybalion. Is it worth reading? I'm half way through the Hermetica now. Extraordinary stuff and amazing how its influence has been so suppressed in the study of science and literature now. Had I been given it to read when I was at university a great deal more work would have made sense. But then that would be too much like giving credence to it, wouldn't it? I suppose what I want to know is is the Kybalion genuinely related or were the Three Initiates doing the common thing of linking it with Hermes T so as to give it added credibility? Look forward to hearing from you. ThePeg 15:40, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 49 | 4 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
New article recently created that may be of interest to you, if you get back. The usual suspects, etc. — Hanuman Das 02:00, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 50 | 11 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Concordia is currently trying to relaunch. I, and all the members of the ex-council, wish to welcome new members to the group. We are a group who aim to promote remaining civil, in an environment where messages can easily be interpretated wrongly.
We are a community, so can only work though community contributions and support. It's the helping that counts.
The council expired one month ago, but due to the current position of the group the current council will remain until the position of the group can be assessed, and whether it would be sensible to keep Concordia going. For most decisions, however, it will be decided by all who choose to partake in discussions. I am trying to relaunch because of the vast amounts of new members we have received, demonstrating that the aims are supported.
If you wish to opt of of further talk-page communications, just let us know here.
- Ian¹³ /t 20:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC). Kindly delivered by MiszaBot.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 51 | 18 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:27, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 52 | 26 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:31, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 1 | 2 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 2 | 8 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:06, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Are you coming back? You have been missed. A lot of things have happened. Hanuman Das has retired from editing. Long story. Ping me when you really return. - 999 ( Talk) 19:30, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 3 | 15 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
I appreciated your vote on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spiritual Humanism (second nomination). Meanwhile, as original nominator, I think the situation has sufficiently changed to appeal once more to your interest. Kind Regards. — SomeHuman 21 Jan 2007 04:15 (UTC)
Thank you for your support on my RfA, which closed favorably this morning. I appreciate the confidence the community has placed in me and am looking forward to my new responsibilities. Please let me know if ever you have any comments or suggestions, especially as I am learning how to use the tools. Best regards, Newyorkbrad 20:38, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
You probably know he left WP back in December. Now he has been accused of being a sockpuppet of Ekajati. There's a thread on WP:ANI. Search for "Starwood". I've pointed out some discrepancies, I don't think they are the same user, regardless of whether Ekajati had other socks. 999 ( Talk) 07:44, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
As you set out for
Ithaka, hope the voyage is long Don't expect Ithaka to make you rich. Ithaka gave you the
marvelous journey |
Well, I'm more concerned with the living at this point, i.e. Ekajati. Blnguyen claims they had no overlapping edits and bases his assessment on the improbablity of this, but I found three examples of overlapping edits within a few minutes of looking for them! Something fishy here. 999 ( Talk) 22:39, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey! lots of work has been done with counter spam efforts. If you do ever get a chance to stop by check out #wikipedia-spam-t . Hope to see you around, and glad that you are back! (nice userpage) Cheers! —— Eagle 101 ( Need help?) 20:40, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
This article has been considerably expanded since you commented in the AfD. Maybe you could take another look at it. Tyrenius 04:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
I am curious to know if you are interested in having another go at requests for adminship. I was scanning the "Administrator hopefuls" category and your name came up as one I recognized. I have not finished reviewing your contributions yet, but what I see so far looks promising. Of course if you're not interested any longer, that is your prerogative.. please let me know here or on my talk page when you get a chance. -- nae' blis 18:23, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Please note that Portal:Thelema and its subpages, which you created, are being nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Thelema, the rationale being lack of activity. You may wish to comment on the MfD. Awyong J. M. Salleh 01:46, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, SynergeticMaggot, I just wanted to thank you for your support on my RfA, which was successful with a final tally of 61/0/2. I'm honored at the trust the community has placed in me and hope my conduct as an administrator will justify that trust. If you have any comments about my use of the tools I would be glad to hear from you on my talk page. Thanks again! Heimstern Läufer 09:10, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Because you are a member of WikiProject Categories, your input is invited on some proposed changes to the design of the {{ Category redirect}} template. Please feel free to view the proposals and comment on the template talk page. -- Russ (talk) 21:24, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Grrrlriot (
talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.