The redirect PRussian invasion of Ukraine has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 29 § PRussian invasion of Ukraine until a consensus is reached. Mvqr ( talk) 13:15, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
I have speedy deleted the above-mentioned redirect as pure trolling. If you create any more ridiculous redirects or otherwise deliberately waste other people's time you may be blocked. Several of your comments in the Redirects for discussion also illustrate your aim of wasting time, for example this and this. Bishonen | tålk 16:08, 29 March 2023 (UTC).
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Malware. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Bruce1ee talk 23:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe. This is a standard message to inform you that the Balkans or Eastern Europe is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. Cinderella157 ( talk) 00:09, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Xaner civilization. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️ Let's Talk ! 16:32, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Xaner civilization (1403 CE), is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Alalch E. 22:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi, regarding Wikipedia:Artemis program and Template:Wikipedia Artemis program - are these attempts to set up a WikiProject? If so, was it both proposed and approved at WP:COUNCIL? If so, please note that both have the wrong page names - they should really be Wikipedia:WikiProject Artemis program and Template:WikiProject Artemis program. If they were not proposed, or were proposed but not approved, have you considered setting it up as a taskforce within Wikipedia:WikiProject Spaceflight? -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 15:24, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
You moved the Wikipedia:WikiProject:Constellation program when the title actually had a purpose.- I did no such thing. If you are going to make such claims, you must demonstrate with evidence that I made that page move. -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 17:24, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi, if someone has had a {{ uw-vand4}} or even a {{ uw-vand3}} and they continue vandalising, please report them to WP:AIV so an admin can block them rather than continuing to warn them. Twinkle has an option that will submit the report for you from the talk page or contributions. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:18, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
@[[User:Example|Example]]:
with the appropriate username as a parameter so the result appears as follows: {{re|Example}}
which generates @
Example:{{re|User1|User2|User3}}
. Some other templates can also be used for the same purpose such as {{
ping group}} or {{
pong}} see
Category:Inline talk templates if your curious. {{
U}} is also frequently used for pings on discussion pages, but most of the other
userspace linking templates serve a more narrow purpose.Hello Starship 24. I have noticed your edits to RFPP and I would like to thank you for taking an interest in that area. However, I wanted to give you some tips over you recent requests for protection/unprotection.
In this, you requested semi-protection of a page that had no edits for over 6 months. Pages only need protection in the event of persistent, recent disruption. This article did not qualify. Then there is also this request for unprotection. The page in question does not need to be edited by IP addresses (the only edits to that page come from a bot) so there is no need to unprotect that page. Doing so could actually harm the article by exposing it to IP vandals.
I appreciate the interest you are taking in this website, but you may want to read up on our protection policy before submitting further protection requests, and from now on, please only request protection to articles if necessary. Thank you, 47.227.95.73 ( talk) 22:33, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:51, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Good day there, Please don't mind me reverting your edit on User talk:Sandbox for user warnings, it's just a test of the Redwarn feature. Regards! DreamRimmer ( talk) 04:06, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi - the discussion at RSN has been closed, so I've come here to answer the question you asked me there. In short, it's not reliable because it is user-generated. This is discussed at WP:UGC (which I linked to in the discussion) - please read that. The arguments you are making about Stack Exchange could be made about Wikipedia itself - we have lots of experts writing articles here, we have active moderation, processes for removing dodgy content, etc etc - but we do not consider ourselves to be a reliable source. The same goes for all user-generated content, including things like IMDB, and Forbes.com (when articles are written by one of their volunteer 'contributors' rather than a staff writer). We simply do not rely on websites that allow random people on the internet to write stuff, hoping that their moderation processes are sufficient to keep their content accurate.
Stack exchange itself has been discussed many times in the past, and there is a strong consensus that it should not be used as a source - you can find links to those discussions at WP:RSP. Girth Summit (blether) 08:31, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Artemis program, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Artemis program and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Artemis program during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Banks Irk ( talk) 14:13, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello Starship 24, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Luan Muça, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not a valid speedy deletion rationale. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Primefac ( talk) 19:52, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi - so, some more tips on sourcing. Per MOS:LEADCITE, the lead section of an article does not need citations provided that (a) there are no controversial assertions in there, and (b) all the content of the lead is a summary of cited content in the body of the article (which ought to be the case). Now, looking at Los Bukis, I see that it does not cite any sources at all; I also note that there is a bunch of stuff in the lead section that is not mentioned anywhere in the body of the article. In short, this is a bad article, and it needs work to bring it up to standard. A good thing to do would be to look for reliable sources that could be used to support and expand the body of the article, and then to remove anything from the lead that cannot be supported. Suitable sources would be books about that genre of music, maybe some websites (although there is a lot of unreliable crud online). What we should not do, however, is use a YouTube profile that literally takes its content from our article - like, it even has an attribution statement saying that they are using our content (which is fine - everything we write here is released under a creative commons license that allows reuse (with attribution) for any purpose. This is discussed at WP:CIRC. Hope that makes sense. Best wishes Girth Summit (blether) 00:34, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi Starship 24, I had attempted to point this out indirectly before ( [1]). Looking at [2], [3] and [4] that happened afterwards, I'm afraid I need to directly ask you to stop doing this. Please don't comment on others' noticeboard reports as you currently lack the experience required for doing so, and please don't judge whether this has changed yourself. If you would like to resume commenting on others' noticeboard reports, let me know.
This is not a strict ban, as I can't issue one in the classical sense described by the banning policy, but you may end up being partially blocked from noticeboards or even all pages if this request is disruptively ignored.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 00:42, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Starship SN20 . Thank you. Banks Irk ( talk) 19:11, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |