This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
An article that you have been involved in editing, Traffic count, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traffic count. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jezhotwells ( talk) 19:42, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
wasnt me -- DiscuccsionAmeri ( talk) 22:25, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I was wondering how to wikify the "Kevin Park (disambiguation)" page. I'm new to Wiki and didn't know how to do it.
Thanks.
Jake. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JJohnsonadsg ( talk • contribs) 01:40, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I wasn't aware that the content I introduced to the Sun Ra article was controversial. Apart from that, I was crewing the event, I just haven't had the chance to write and publish my book in the last 36 hours to provide a printed reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.232.160 ( talk) 02:40, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 81.159.232.160 ( talk) 02:42, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your verbose response. I love you too. 81.159.232.160 ( talk) 02:54, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
The reasons why you removed the nomination for deletion of the Wikipedia article The Streets are Watching are unclear. You state that this wikipedia article was nominated before and the nomination had been removed. However, there is nothing in the discussion page regarding why the nomination is removed. I will be raising this point in the discussion page and you are welcome to comment. IF you don't comment, the page will be nominated for deletion again. DivaNtrainin ( talk) 19:42, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
You are fast. Beat me to nominating and notifying the user :) -- Scythre ( talk) 14:26, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Regardless of references, that was factual information. It must be included. 80.2.15.201 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:02, 16 August 2009 (UTC).
Hello Snigbrook, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Amerinda has been removed. It was removed by ExecTaxes with the following edit summary '(Specifics of trademark information added. ~~~~)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with ExecTaxes before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot ( talk) 21:30, 18 August 2009 (UTC) ( Learn how to opt out of these messages)
Hi, I'd like to notify you of the below. The account you reported only vandalized once, and was warned by an admin.
I had to remove this report as the AIV page is often backlogged. Thanks, ceran thor 20:26, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
This isn't eligible for any of the criteria for speedy deletion, and it looks like it can be fixed by editing the article. I don't know what you intended to do, if you want the article to be moved to Michelinoceratidae you could nominate the redirect for speedy deletion, or if you want the redirect from Michelinoceratidae to be deleted you could nominate it at.... snigbrook (talk) 13:32, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, not disputing your edit, just intrigued. I moved away from Skem 4 years ago, but while I was living there all my mail arrived stamped with a Wigan sorting office stamp. I assumed that this would mean that the postal town was Wigan, is my assumption incorrect or has the stamp changed in the last few years? Where does one find out this information? As it's been edited to at least three different places, if there's a source we can list, maybe that'd be for the best? Fol de rol troll ( talk) 08:34, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Why did you scrap/re edit my entire history of Tiara Air? I was there for 36 months and know the company intimately. The facts are facts so why are they constantly either edited or removed entirely. It would appear that the company (Tiara Air) believe that Wikipedia is a forum for their personal advertising. I listed facts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by No bias no bull ( talk • contribs) 19:20, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
No facts are facts.
1. One aircraft is abandoned without engines at the Aruba International airport.[Reported to me by a member of staff]
2. I was present when the decison NOT to continue with aquisition of more modern pressurised turbo props was made.
3. There has been a very high turnover of senior managers over the past 3 years since the company began - average time in post has been only a few months each person; not indicative of stability in aviation [my speciallity]
4. The company has continually tried to 'hijack' the article with their own propaganda, most of which is at best 'suspect' and in many case simply 'untrue'.
5. The local Aruba Director of Civil Aviation HAS revoked their Air Operators Certificate 3 times in the past 3 years - another serious issue that people aught to be aware of. —Preceding unsigned comment added by No bias no bull ( talk • contribs) 22:58, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Could you help me with this page please. Mr Hall of England ( talk) 18:14, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Just wanted to drop by and say thank you for catching and fixing the "Bold text" I inadvertantly added to Jackpot (CSI). Not sure how that happened! But anyway I appreciate the catch. Have a great day! LoveStreamFlow ( talk) 18:03, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi Snigbrook - I've moved your CFD nomination for the above category to WP:Stub types for deletion, which is where stub categories and templates are debated. Grutness... wha? 22:42, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
I proded and removed the link, because of WP:Disambiguation guidelines. The relevant guideline is "before constructing a new disambiguation page, determine a specific topic name for all existing pages, and the name for the disambiguation page." I also don't think that "inspired by the cuisine" is an appropriately distinct enough reference to warrant being on the disambiguation page, and the other page didn't have a link (in fact, it linked to itself, a style problem) That movie, however, is "Politiki kouzina" in Polish, so it should be a redirect (and if someone creates a page about the cuisine, it should go at Politiki kouzina (lower case, not the uppercase one) and Politiki Kouzina should redirect to Politiki kouzina (disambiguation) or Politiki kouzina. I hope that's a satisfactory explanation. Shadowjams ( talk) 01:26, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi: Since you contested my prod, I thought you'd like to know that I have nominated Hanley Grange for deletion. Your opinion at the deletion discussion is welcome. Best, Ray Talk 16:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
There are no references or even external links that assert notability. As such I feel that it should be deleted. Wizard191 ( talk) 21:29, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I have noticed that you are from Lancashire and I was wondering if you have heard of the new WikiProject group of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria. If you are interested in joining please feel free to become a paricipant and help us achive our goals. If you do join I am looking forward to your contributions. 93gregsonl2 ( talk) 21:01, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
I'm slightly confused why the link to GAN was removed. It was put there for easy access, for those wanting to check on the progress, plus it provided an easy route for myself too, who has done 99.9% of the work on the article, and also the person who put it up for nomination. Is there any reason why you removed the link? ( Pr3st0n ( talk) 20:13, 20 September 2009 (UTC))
Just seen the full edit... the guidelines set out on GAN didn't specify that "places" could be added into the suptopic bar. This does help, although I'm dubious as it didn't state this was permitted in the guidelines. ( Pr3st0n ( talk) 20:22, 20 September 2009 (UTC))
I've noticed you've not got one of these yet... here's your first, of what could be many to come!
The Helping Hand Barnstar | ||
I'm awarding this Barnstar to Snigbrook, for the helping hand given, in order to help provide an easy access link for Wikipedia:GAN#How to nominate an article on the Talk:Lostock Hall page. (Gareth aka Pr3st0n ( talk) 21:06, 20 September 2009 (UTC)) |
Thanks for the barnstar. It isn't my first, there's one somewhere in my talk archives probably from before I created my user page. snigbrook ( talk) 21:29, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the help at Austin Craig! :) I was quite impressed at the speed by which got those links., and how you got them. Did you get them through google? Marax ( talk) 08:10, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi Snigbrook. The article Eliza Gamble was previously tagged for speedy deletion under criterion A7 (no indication of importance). I notice that you rejected this assessment of the article and removed the tag. I have now nominated the article at Articles for Deletion, as I believe the article does fit the criteria. I invite you to add your comments to the discussion if you still think otherwise. Kind regards, ∙ AJCham (talk) 00:58, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for locating and correcting related redirects. Afaprof01 ( talk) 23:19, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
I don't know why you made me do it the hard way. :( A refimprove tag is when there are references but there need to be more. An unsourced section tag is when the entire section is unsourced. This is a BLP concern. Who then was a gentleman? ( talk) 20:29, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
For getting to UAA with this just a few minutes before I did. -- Soap Talk/ Contributions 15:40, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Dealt with Tigerdirect12345. Thanks! Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 19:14, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
I hope it was not my text that you saw as nonsense - I was trying to encourage the other user to be constructive with Wikipedia. If you look at his contributions and talk page, you'll see why.
Unrelated, but BTW, have a look at User:Redrose64#Why Redrose64?. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 13:38, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the latest vandal on my talk page. I appreciate your help! Best, Jusda fax 04:07, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
...needs 'semi-protection', either that or numerious accounts will need to be blocked. GoodDay ( talk) 20:28, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi. This seemed to be incomplete. Also, there's a few other pages that should be nominated along with this (since there's some wierd sock stuff going on). (See the discussion I've been having with another user at User_talk:Accounting4Taste#Regarding_these_Strutt_Family_trust_articles). -- Bfigura ( talk) 17:22, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
for sorting that out! Leaky Caldron 13:08, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Snigbrook - apologies for wasting your time with the incorrect CSD nom for the Narrows (EP) article. I had mistakenly read the criteria as "does not indicate why its subject is important or significant or where the artist's article does not exist. Lesson learned! Cheers, Jezebel'sPonyo shhh 19:32, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for noticing the copyright problem with File:Slpa.jpg. When a copyrighted or trademarked logo has been uploaded incorrectly as a public domain or user-created file, you can correct the problem with adding {{ Non-free logo}} and a fair use rationale to the page. This way, Wikipedia can legitimately continue to use the logo in the article about the organization to which the logo belongs, and an administrator doesn't need to delete the file. You may find Wikipedia:FurMe a convenient way to add a fair use rationale to the page. -- Eastmain ( talk) 04:04, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Why you revert?-- 125.25.81.131 ( talk) 12:46, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
RAI is the italian T.V and its article name is RAI not its full name. But why this Polish T.V is Telewizja Polska not TVP? I think you must move it and TVP move to TVP (disambiguation). TVP is most known as Telewizja Polska-- 125.25.81.131 ( talk) 13:51, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Dear Snigbrook, I apologise for deceiving you. | ||
le quotidien ( talk · contribs) was me posing as a newbie as part of the wp:NEWT experiment. Analysis of this particular test is at Wikipedia:Newbie treatment at CSD/Circeus and your input would be most welcome. I really believe you went above and beyond in cleaning up Doris Lussier, particularly the time spent with categories and the WikiProject templates. Kep up the work. Wikipedia needs editors like that! Circéus ( talk) 22:10, 15 November 2009 (UTC) |
Dear Snigbrook.
I dont know why editors hate me so much. I can vouch that I am not a sockpuppet!
Thank you, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lady Paddock ( talk • contribs) 00:53, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
We have added several primary sources to The American Outlawsentry and would like to know what we need to do further to prevent deletion. Garrett3000 ( talk) 19:55, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Nice work recovering the history section of offset printing. Somebody sure butchered it! — Parhamr ( talk) 03:04, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi Snigbrook - I just expediently reverted some extremely offensive (racist) vandalism to the above, and noticed that you posted a final warning to the IP on December 1. I'm neither very experienced nor technically competent in such matters: would it be possible for you to take it further? I personally feel such offence justifies a block. Regards, Haploidavey ( talk) 19:39, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Mnay thanks for the revert back, think i must have done the undo of the vandalism at the same time as yourself, will have to keep an eye on it! there is someone going around recently editing silly things into the area topics, so keep an eye out! Thanks again! Bankhallbretherton ( talk) 23:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
That picture is of public transport in Indian state West Bengal's capital Calcutta,Tell me if it doesn't come under free license for fair mean. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Race911 ( talk • contribs) 04:48, 3 December 2009 (UTC) -- Race911 ( talk) 04:53, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for this. Did you know we had a bot who used to do this kind of work? See User talk:Bot523#Bot not active anymore?. — Sebastian 01:44, 6 December 2009 (UTC) (I stopped watching this page. If you would like to continue the talk, please do so here and ping me.)
Thanks for fixing my typo at Talk:Alto High School! Cheers, Cunard ( talk) 09:29, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Please can you tell me why you removed the Link to Mellor Village Hall. It has been removed a couple of times and I would like to know why. Thanks
Stuhodgson ( talk) 09:24, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
OK I understand this, I added this link as the same type of link is on the Mellor Brook Page Mellor Brook. Should this be removed also or is that allowed to stay? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stuhodgson ( talk • contribs) 11:46, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
The Sunday Sport, while a total rag of a newspaper, was cited and established as a source for the nude pgotos of Ms Katona. This was done three years ago and remained stet until Hullaballoo Wolfowitz worked his magic all over the article (removing things it took me 10 seconds to find citations for, etc). Your comment about 'declined' is spot on, but other issues have long since been processed. You don't want to shadow an editor the 'calibre' of HW...! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.192.1.168 ( talk) 19:31, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
That publication actually showed the censored images, printing the 'open leg' photograph (as can be seen on the internet, etc.) with a 'CENSORED' sticker over her labia. No additional RS required then. 80.192.1.168 ( talk) 20:04, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Indeed. Makes you wonder why HW deleted it. Actually, that's rhetorical, as HW has an extensive history of deletionism. The image (which, as previsouly mentioned, can be seen in image searches on Google, etc.) was nude, was 'open leg' and was printed in the Sunday Sport with a censored sticker over her lady parts. Should that info be included ar will it suffice to leave it as it is? 80.192.1.168 ( talk) 20:27, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
EDIT: It was made clear on the talk page that 'topless' wasn't completely accurate, however. Definitely nude. 80.192.1.168 ( talk) 20:29, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
I guess that nude is acceptable then. I removed 'open leg', even though it was accurate. Re-instate or leave it, what do you think? I should maybe put it back as it's relevant. 80.192.1.168 ( talk) 21.19, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
I'm still mulling it over. Can only be a matter of time before Hullaballoo Wolfowitz attacks the entry again, however. Nude is verifiable as per the citation, hence why it's in the copy. talk) 20:29, 20 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.41.73.133 ( talk)
That's an IRL ladyfriend of mine. Go away. Miserlou ( talk) 03:58, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
The policy of Wikipedia to refuse to mention the possibility that the Climategate emails were released lawfully by a whistleblower is an instance of objectionable prejudice, which we shall now publicize worldwide. Your contributions to this policy will be reported to the police now investigating this affair, since it appears that Wikipedia has made itself part of the underlying scientific fraud that is now under investigation by Interpol, Europol, the East Anglia police, and the e-crime unit of the Metropolitan Police, as well as by the US Congress. Wikipedia's unreasonable unwillingness to allow proper and balanced discussion of anything to do with the debate about climate, and its refusal to block editors such as Connolley, ChrisO, Dabelstein-Petersen and others who are paid full-time to hack and disrupt the Wikipedia biographies of anyone who dares to question the scientific "orthodoxy" about "global warming", is no longer acceptable and appears to be part of a pattern of criminal behavior. It, and you, will be reported to police in this context.
You don't have to tell me that I forgot something on a page about Frans Duijts, if it is not okay. Just delete it. Scream and cry, but I don't care. My English is not very good, but that's because I'm a Dutchman. So don't send me incomprehensible messages in you're stupid English languague. JUST DELETE THE PAGE. don't thank you. User: Daan2