This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | → | Archive 19 |
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Iowalaw2 ( talk) 00:46, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Greetings! I see you've removed recently-added material from L. Steven Grasz. I don't see where this qualifies for a 3RR exemption per WP:BLP, as the material is adequately sourced. I strongly suggest that you self-revert and then explain your concerns about the edit at the talk page. — C.Fred ( talk) 02:33, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi - I’m Kevin Blackstone. I see that you’ve edited my Wiki page in the past. I have a new official photo, but am not sure how to upload it and remove the other one. Could you advise? Editor369 ( talk) 17:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, I’ll give it a try. 71.114.70.117 ( talk) 23:00, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Snickers - I’m clearly not up to par on the editing. I uploaded my new official pic to the same site as the old one (C. Kevin Blackstone.jpg) on Wikipedia Commons, but can’t seem to figure out how to put it into the place of the old one. Can you assist, or maybe advise what I’m doing wrong? Editor369 ( talk) 14:15, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanks very much. I’ll just edit the title, since, technically, I’m not sworn in until the final attestation, hopefully in a few weeks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editor369 ( talk • contribs) 14:12, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, President Biden hasn't announced any nominees to the courts yet, so it seems premature to add those names to the draft. 73.110.217.186 ( talk) 19:47, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
FWIW, I'm in agreement with you at Antony Blinken. However, it's futile to stop less knowledgeable editors (including IPs) from updating these bios, at the moment they're confirmed by the US Senate. Most folks don't know enough to wait until the swearing in. Protection of all the Biden cabinet & cabinet level nominees should be in place, until they're sworn in. GoodDay ( talk) 19:49, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Lam Nguyen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Clarityfiend ( talk) 07:49, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knut S. Johnson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Marquardtika ( talk) 21:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi Snickers2686! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terrence M. Andrews until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Clarityfiend ( talk) 00:54, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles to which you have significantly contributed, are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted:
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terrence M. Andrews until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:03, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Why are you making cosmetic changes like this which do not affect the reader-facing article at all. It just clutters up watchlists. MB 18:32, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
{{
infobox judge}}
is just a redirect to Snickers2686/Archive 14 | |
---|---|
Hi Snickers2686! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Hello, Snickers2686!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Robert McClenon (
talk) 00:17, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
|
Hey, regarding this edit to the article for U.S. federal judge Lynn Adelman, can you explain the change in title? "United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Wisconsin" is the official title (as defined by the statute) and is the proper U.S. government style (according to U.S. government style guides). I used to do a lot of paperwork for a federal agency and this style was strictly enforced. On Wikipedia, I see this title ("United States District Judge for...") frequently edited to the incorrect style ("Judge of the United States District Court..."), and I have to assume it's because there's some guidance or discussion about this being the default preferred judicial style on Wikipedia ("Judge of XXX"). But I can't find such guidance anywhere on Wikipedia; I started a discussion months ago on the federal judiciary WikiProject and got no engagement. Would love to know where this style comes from. -- Asdasdasdff ( talk) 03:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
I see you removed numerous birth years for federal judges I researched. I will go back to include the links for the birth years. I see there are dozens of federal judges that have their year of birth included that were posted by other people that you did not remove. I am trying to understand why you decided to remove the updates I made. Going forward, if you would just let me know if there is an issue with something I posted before you just delete it I would be happy to correct it.
Thank you Dequanhargrove ( talk) 02:19, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your response. And correct, they don't list the date of birth however for instance if it says they are 40 years of age, I just do the subtraction from 2021. It may be off by months but I am ok with listing it as 1979/1980 as I have seen you do on other pages. I am just asking instead of completely deleting the work I researched, lets work together to have as much accurate information as we can. Dequanhargrove ( talk) 19:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. That is a great explanation. I was not aware there was a format for inserting the age. I do not have the exact dates of birth's. I will not update the side article unless I have the exact dates of birth's going forward. I can just indicate in the main article section the year of birth with a notation it is an approximate year of birth (Ex: 1979/1980) as I have seen done on other articles so the year of birth does not show up in the main section of the courts. Dequanhargrove ( talk) 15:43, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Excellent, I will review. Thank you Dequanhargrove ( talk) 16:06, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Snickers2686,
Thank you for creating Douglas L. Parker.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
The material in this article is identical to https://blog.intelex.com/2021/04/12/douglas-l-parker-nominated-by-u-s-president-biden-for-assistant-secretary-for-occupational-safety-and-health/ and needs to be rephrased,
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mccapra}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Mccapra ( talk) 11:11, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
Responding to your question about where I saw the dates, here's the tweet from Amb. Susan Rice where she swore in the new governors! [1]
Grandpa12345 ( talk) 03:32, 17 June 2021 (UTC)Grandpa12345
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dilawar Syed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Mccapra ( talk) 08:43, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi Snickers,
Do you think it would be appropriate for you to create the article for Jonathan Meyer. POTUS Biden has nominated him to serve as general counsel of DHS, essentially the number 3 position there. It has been highlighted in numerous articles. The nomination is currently pending before the US Senate. It appears you have taken note of and edited the DHS Nominations page so is this an appointment for which its own page should be created, particularly given the heightened publicity around the legality of DHS actions?
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Rankin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Memphis.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 5 July 2021 (UTC)