Welcome!
Hello, Skbhat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
( A rundhati Bakshi ( talk • contribs)) 17:24, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Firstly, please consider another title for the page; the title "Hindu Imposition" reeks of an NPOV violation.
Secondly, if there really is a viable article to be had, please consider creating it either as a sandbox page in userspace (e.g. User:Skbhat/Sandbox) or through the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process, so that it can be reviewed beforehand to ensure that it's consistent with our inclusion and content rules — and then, if and when it's deemed okay, it will get moved into place. There have been far too many problems with the title so far to let the page be created directly in article space without oversight.
Thanks. Bearcat ( talk) 04:28, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
I have reverted the quote by TS Eliot you recently added to the article. As such the lead section should just introduce and summarize the content in the article. (see Wikipedia:Lead section) The lead section in Indian philosophy starts with a historical introduction. Your quote doesn't fit in there. My suggestion is, if you have many such quotes attributable to reliable sources, consider adding a separate section after Political philosophy. Regards. Correct Knowledge «৳alk» 05:36, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Skbhat,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Tokyogirl79
(。◕‿◕。) 09:16, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Hello, Skbhat. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled " History Centrism".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at
WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:History Centrism}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 18:43, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)