| Please leave a . |
Welcome!
Hello, ShedMediaUK, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
AnemoneProjectors (
talk) 16:37, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, and welcome to the EastEnders WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of EastEnders.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Please participate in any of our parent WikiProjects that might interest you.
- The project has a bimonthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered in its entirety, but several other formats are available.
There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
- Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every EastEnders-related article in Wikipedia.
- Can you code? The automation department uses automated and semi-automated methods to perform batch tasks that would be tedious to do manually.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around!
AnemoneProjectors ( talk) 16:37, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- By the way, ignore the stuff about the newsletter and the automation department as neither of them exist :) AnemoneProjectors ( talk) 16:52, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi there
You removed what I wrote about Barbara the cleaner not returning for Series 4, because it was not sourced, which is perfectly understandable. I don't actually know how to cite sources, but all the information can be found here, so if you can replace that with this link as a source, that would be great. Thanks x
http://www.comedy.co.uk/guide/tv/not_going_out/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by George.millman ( talk • contribs) 15:35, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Over the last few months, I have made a various number of edits to this programmes article(s). However, on reviewing the state they are in and the unpleasant amount of vandalism that is thrust upon them, I have taken the decision to no longer be involved with trying to maintain them. Sorry guys but it is near next to impossible to improve them to a higher standard without joint support from other Wiki users, and preventing them from being vandalised is even more of a trial. Good luck with anyone who try in the future. ShedMediaUK ( talk) 19:57, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
In the recent months, I have not noticed a high amount of vandalism. I have, however, noted that the page does seem to be rather convoluted and inconsistent. At some point in the future, I will work on the page. Users have done a good job. I just feel that there is room for improvement, such as your minor recent edit for Series 7. The page could use a bit of tidying up. I am sure that someone will rectify the page if so inclined. ( Galaxycat ( talk) 12:41, 11 April 2012 (UTC))
Hi Shed,
Thanks for the best wishes. It would make things so much easier if there were a way to create tables without having to deal with the raw code; I've tried to create and manipulate tables on here several times with little success. I agree that the list would look a lot better if the second half and the first were formatted consistently. Hopefully someone will come along who has a better grasp on Wikipedia's table code than I do.
Happy editing,
Neelix ( talk) 21:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
I can totally understand your frustration with WR articles I have seen above. Just thought I'd make sure you know that you are at WP:3RR on List of Waterloo Road episodes. I'll keep my eye on the article and revert if the user persists, so feel free to take a break from the page so you don't get into bother yourself. Happy editing. U-Mos ( talk) 23:37, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Thank you very much for bringing that to my attention (however you came to see it!). I've flagged it up at the administrator noticeboard. U-Mos ( talk) 22:57, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Max Tyler for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Max Tyler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Tyler (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. U-Mos ( talk) 16:55, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Template:Waterloo Road has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
U-Mos (
talk) 16:59, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello. I have noted that you have recently undid a user's edits on the Waterloo Road page. The user broke Series 7 down into three parts by labelling them Parts A, B and C. Do you think that this is a discussion which should be debated in the 'talk page?' Thank you ( Galaxycat ( talk) 08:45, 12 April 2012 (UTC))
I am sorry if I caused offence. This was not my intention. Perhaps it is a discussion which can be opened up in the 'talk' page ( Galaxycat ( talk) 22:00, 12 April 2012 (UTC))
Protection for List of Waterloo Road episodes ?
An admin has left a question for you at WP:RFPP regarding this request. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 21:34, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. —
Tom Morris (
talk) 19:04, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
ShedMediaUK ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
My user name does not reflect the Shed Media company. I actually created this name BEFORE they adopted theres. And as a user for quite a while now, and not having had this issue before, I will not be changing my username ShedMediaUK ( talk) 10:26, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I would query the dates involved - you appear to have started editing in 2010, while their article gives 1998 as their foundation (as does their website), and the name Shed Media was present on the article in 2009. You seen very involved with their productions and characters, with few edits I can see on outside topics - but never the company's article. Peridon ( talk) 10:51, 20 April 2012 (UTC)