Just thought I'd let you know that this IP appears to be a dynamic one, as I'd just clicked on the "Log In" link when I was told that I had new messages, even though I wasn't logged in yet. I don't know who was the last person to use this IP, but it sure wasn't me.
-- Special Operative MACAVITY Debrief me 13:38, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey philip thanks for taking care of my page: Urmston Grammar School, I am a new member of Wikipedia and so am still getting used to it, one member Nlu was very helpful and tried to help me sort out problems with my page. I Hope one day i can return the favour, Many Thanks Alex, -- Gocartsforelephants 22:07, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
The rules on {{ db-repost}} have been refined to refer specifically to articles that were deleted through WP:AFD or similar consensus. For reposts of speedied material, the actual speedy reason should be used again, as possibly the new content might be different enough. In this case, it's still a {{ db-bio}}. Fan-1967 18:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
I have the significance to the city right there. What are you talking about? Just because you've never heard of it doesn't mean it's insignificant. that's a terribly ignorant view.
I think that here you used {{subst:}} with {{ fact}}. It's much easier on the eyes if you don't. - 152.91.9.144 00:06, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
I read about you on an outside site. Your knowledge of true crime and the English language is phenomenal. I just wanted you to know I am a huge fan of yours. StonedBushby StonedBushby 21:08, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
I would like to thank you for the ER review. Sr13 ( T| C) Editor review 07:47, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Apeal
---- It might be not the right place to write, please, forgive me, but I have found it rather difficult to reach editors of Wiki.
Dear Mr. Gronowski
You just removed a link in San Francisco article to my site: * San Francisco Virtual Tour. I believe this link is not spam. It is totally in line with wiki link policy. Please, visit the site. If you still have an objection, e-mail me to discuss it: [email protected].
Let me remind here the except from link policy ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links ):
"..information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks); or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article (such as reviews and interviews)."
My virtual tours provide great amount of free reach content, no doubt found meaningful by hundreds of thousands of visitors of my site. It can not be added to the article, since it is a virtual tour and needs a specialized software ( Java Applet ) to run. My virtual tours allow navigation around the place as if you are there.
I hope will will be able to come to my site and find yourself that what it is very useful. Please, refer to my guest book, and read what other people are writing about it: http://www.virtuar.com/gue7bk/guestb245o21.html
Thank you!
Igor Polk, www.virtuar.com
You do realize that you are writing to a 16 year Canadian boy with no friends except the internet. He has no power and no say. He is not an admin. He has been mocked on other sites. You are justified- there is just no reason to appeal to this nincompoop. ColScott The King of this Clown
207.6.209.233 03:38, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
If you bothered to check my contributions you could see that I never actually reported ColScott to HighInBC or anyone for that matter. ColScott was blocked by a different administrator for his persistent spamming and was later re-blocked for a longer period of time by HighInBC. I just really don't care about a person who spams pages, I care about the integrity of those pages. Philip Gronowski Contribs 21:24, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Cheers for the support in the above Afd, been taking a lot of flack off dodgy IP addresses for nominating it. I've given USER:207.6.209.233 a warning for making personal attacks on you. If he continues I will report it to AIV. I also gave you an editor review, I hope you find it constructive, I just don't want you going into Rfa and getting rejected for silly little reasons. Anyway, hope all is well RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 23:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Dankeschone fur deine reviewen! Please don't tag that as db-nonsensense! I was meant to say thankyou for the review. Probably should have elaborated more on my questions but I was a bit annoyed when I went for a review, said all I wanted to say in my statement! It has been a pleasure meeting you tonight and happy editing (I better not say good luck :)) RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 00:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
I have reported the above user to AIV for attacks on our talk pages, hopefully now it will be sorted!! (junior :P!) RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 02:09, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
You know what I mean!! RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 02:23, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, do you dispute that he was a Prussian? -- Der Eberswalder 00:39, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
You just nominated the page I just created (winterkids) for speedy deletion, and before I'd finished reading the notice and gone to add "hangon" to the page, it was already gone. I'm not an experienced wikipedian, so I'm sorry if I missed something, but to my mind it met WP:MUSIC. Phunky 22:00, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I've reported 207.6.209.233 to AIV for continued personal attacks, he's just left one on his talk page, hope that helps RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 01:41, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Please review this article as several anonymous IPs struck this article today and did a lot of edits. I tried to keep up with them but some edits may have slipped through. I am not the expert on this article but from your words on the talkpage, you might be. Thanks, Ronbo76 00:54, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Philip, nice to meet you, I believe this user Arurba that reverted your edit is the same person as someone from Poland who keeps getting blocked for being disruptive. his username is Serafin but he more commonly edits under the IP address 131.104.218.46. The articles he usually "edits" (it's more like vandalism) are Jan Dzierzon, Expulsion of Germans after WWII, Recovered Territories and Estimates of number of deaths in connection with expulsion of Germans after WWII. Take a look at his past edits and see for yourself the user's past edits to better acquaint yourself with this user, as you will probably have to continue dealing with him as he is very tenacious at his pursuits. Special:Contributions/131.104.218.46 Special:Contributions/Serafin
-- Jadger 03:02, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
I don't think I will be blocked for violating the 3RR, as it doesn't apply to stopping vandalism, as this clearly was.
-- Jadger 16:52, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
At first it was not vandalism, but then when he refused to cooperate with other users and keeps adding his own unreferenced POV into articles and was blocked, then evaded his block, it became vandalism. A smart user would have learned that he isn't accomplishing and cooperated with users, I learned that when I first started and was only blocked once in my whole time on wikipedia, this user has been blocked atleast half a dozen times in less than a month. Compromise is the strength of Wikipedia, and he will not, when he sees he can't get anywhere, he stops discussion and just starts revert wars.
-- Jadger 00:29, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Also, he is evading his block right now by writing to you on your userpage, and editing articles. Can you please translate what you are speaking with him about on this userpage, he has personally attacked me before in Polish on another user talk page.
-- Jadger 00:31, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thank you, as you can see his logic is very flawed. "I'm not callling anyone a nazi. I am only asking if he is one or if he collaborates with them. Removal of commonly known truths about Criminal effects of Nazism is a proof that somebody is a Nazi." When the article has nothing to do with Nazi atrocities comments on Nazi atrocities should be removed. You do not see anything about nazi Atrocities on the Sesame Street article. The articles he is editing are about atrocities committed by others (not nazis), one should not try to minimalize them by saying "the nazis did this much worse".
Also, you can see "You can rest assured that I will be doing everything to close as many articles as I can." that his cooperation is practically hopeless, which is rather sad, I would like this to come to an end so I can get back to more useful edits. Did I mention before that he has been permanently blocked from both German and Polish Wikipedias for the same actions? We should learn from their experience and not repeat it.
-- Jadger 19:09, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Have a look at my user page, its right at the bottom, thought you might appreciate it phil! Hope Death By Gluten don't hate me too much! RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 01:15, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
I know what you mean, I have been coming home from school and just turning on my computer, even when I don't need to. It is no help that vandalism has been on the rise. Thanks for the toolbox by the way. Philip Gronowski Contribs 01:56, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
How may I help you? -- Sopoforic 03:53, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Look at the template you've just added to the user page, by either saving or previewing your work. If the link "Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/PUPPETMASTER" is not red, that means there is an existing evidence page about this possible puppetmaster, i.e. the user has been suspected in the past. If that link is red, go ahead and click it, to create a new evidence page on the suspected puppetmaster. On the other hand, if there is already an existing evidence page for this user, you should start a fresh evidence page under a different name. Use the next available name in the series Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/PUPPETMASTER (2nd) (or (3rd), (4th) and so on). Remember to replace the term PUPPETMASTER with the actual account name of the user, and don't forget to save the user page that you just modified.
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="width: auto;" |- | [[Image:Puppeter template.gif|50px| ]] | '''It is suspected that this user may be a [[Wikipedia:Sock puppet|sock puppet]], [[Wikipedia:Sock puppet|meat puppet]] or impersonator of [[User:Serafin|Serafin]]'''.<br>Please refer to [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Serafin]] for evidence. <small>See [{{fullurl:Special:Log/block|page=User:{{PAGENAMEE}}}} block log]</small> {| style="width: 100%; background: transparent; " |- | align="left" | <small>[[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry/Notes for the suspect|Notes for the suspect]]</small> | align="right" | <small>[[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry/Notes for the accuser|Notes for the accuser]]</small> |} |}
I need not be afraid about it. Review jadger repeated activity without editor value. You want discuses historical fact I welcome, but actually you started the ware against Serafin is not it? And you have nothing except some biased personal view to kill the historical enters. Do you support nationalistic German line? Stop jadger and start to discuss you ideas with me.-- 207.245.84.70 05:17, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Ja też próbuje być grzeczny ale nie dla tych co gwałcą obiektywną prawdę. Dla jakich celów współpracujesz z Nazistami? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 168.213.1.132 ( talk • contribs).
No problema. Ja mogę dyskutować do momentu aż widzę jakiś sens. W wypadku Jadgera przestałem się wysilać. W momencie gdy ktoś zarzuca systematyczne ludobójstwo Polakom i nie realizuje co mówi jest dla mnie skończony. Zobacz jak niżej:
P.S. you said: "Please be careful the decision was USSR, USA and UK and was done for the sake of future peace anyway. Ask them to compensate Germany the “loses”" The potsdam agreement was not a binding agreement, and it never gave the land to Poland, it gave them temporary administration over the lands, and using that administration they expelled and murdered millions of Germans, then claimed the land for themselves with Soviet backing later on. stop trying to blame others for the crimes that your nation committed, the blame lands squarely on your shoulders [3]
Trochę więcej o moich usiłowaniach porozumienia się z Jadgerem możesz się dowiedzieć z: [4]
Po prostu nie komunikuje się z nim według tego jak niżej:
Świetnie że starasz się być obiektywny i sprawiedliwy, ale to jest cecha polska, nic takiego nie spotkałem ani tutaj w Kanadzie ani w zachowaniu niemieckim. Obrzucają nas błotem ale jak chcesz im przypomnieć co oni zrobili to masz na głowie całe stado które nie pyta o obiektywne wartości. Przykład w edycji: [6] (cur) (last) 12:07, 12 January 2007 Serafin (Talk | contribs) (Summary)
Wniosek: nasza narodowa wola do zgody kosztuje konsternacje tych co protestują przeciw zorganizowanej zaślepionej sile – choćby to był tylko narodowy charakter obcych.
ODNOŚNIE: Jezeli bedziesz chcial cos zmienic, przedyskutuj to najpierw na "Talk Page" i poczekaj na zgode innych uzytkownikow zanim zaczniesz cos zmieniac.
ODNOŚNIE: Zamierzam poprosić administracje o zabezpieczenie strony przeciwko jakimkolwiek zmianom.
ODNOŚNIE: Jednoczesnie chce poprosic abys nie nazywal mnie albo innych uzytkownikow Nazistami.
ODNOŚNIE: Mimo ze moja prosba nie jest formalna, prosze zebys zdal sobie sprawe z tego, ze nazywanie kogokolwiek Nazista spowoduje, ze bedziesz zablokowany i nie bedziesz mogl zmienic niczego.
Moj Drogi, Insynuacje to nie sa wyzwiska :) A trzeba wiedziec kogo sie popiera zanim podejmie sie akcje. Robisz komus afront bez wiekszych ceregieli a pozniej sie obrazasz ze ktos Ci odpyskuje. Czy teraz juz wiesz kogo wsparles? AS>
Unikanie odpowiedzi nie leży polskim charakterze. Zrobiłeś bałagan i zostawiłeś. Pytałem Cię czy już załważyłeś komu pomagałeś. Taki brak odpowiedzialności charakteryzuje Kanadyjczyków. W Polsce mówi się jak powiedziałeś "A" będziesz musiał powiedzić "B". AS>
I noticed you reverted his edit to Eaton Hall (Cheshire). He also wrote something irrelevant on Ron Wilson here. Greenarrow71 should definitely be monitored for the next few days and probably banned if this continues. -- Whiteknox 04:46, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Whoa, I didn't even notice that other edit. Thanks for reverting it. I don't think he will be a problem anymore, he hasn't edited in the last few days. If he does continue to vandalise he will be blocked for a period of time. Banning is usually a last case resort too. Visit Wikipedia:Vandalism for more info. You can also use templates like the ones found here to warn vandals. Cheers, Philip Gronowski Contribs 04:57, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Philip, I suspect -- based on writing style -- that Spawnopedia may be your old "friend" ColScott. They certainly employ the same rhetorical style as well as specific interests. -- Kynn 21:48, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
That is more insulting than you calling me a troll. I don't see any similarity bewteen us. Among other things I know Wikipedia far better than you. Please apologize. Spawnopedia 21:52, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
How did he get your email? You can post the e-mails here and I will review if what he is saying violates policy. Philip Gronowski Contribs 22:39, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
I can't see any proof that he is a friend of Hamsher, unless proof is shown then I will assume he is not. Philip Gronowski Contribs 22:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
I have received the following two email messages and have not responded to either:
Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: by 10.49.30.15 with SMTP id h15cs519511nfj; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:14:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.91.15 with SMTP id o15mr8341768qbb.1169500444858; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:14:04 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from bay0-omc2-s16.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc2-s16.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.152]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z21si7694223qbc.2007.01.22.13.14.04; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:14:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 65.54.246.152 as permitted sender) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.162.35]) by bay0-omc2-s16.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:13:26 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:13:24 -0800 Message-ID: <[email protected]> Received: from 65.54.162.200 by by108fd.bay108.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:13:23 GMT X-Originating-IP: [207.6.209.233] X-Originating-Email: [[email protected]] X-Sender: [email protected] From: "David Magnus" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Bcc: Subject: Hane Jamsher Accolyte Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:13:23 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2007 21:13:24.0972 (UTC) FILETIME=[274642C0:01C73E6A] Return-Path: [email protected] Hey Kynn is this the best address for spam? _________________________________________________________________ FREE online classifieds from Windows Live Expo ÔøΩ buy and sell with people you know http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwex0010000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://expo.live.com?s_cid=Hotmail_tagline_12/06 Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: by 10.49.30.15 with SMTP id h15cs522726nfj; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:53:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.224.11 with SMTP id b11mr8415732qbr.1169502817633; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:53:37 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from bay0-omc3-s13.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc3-s13.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.213]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f14si7734091qba.2007.01.22.13.53.37; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:53:37 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 65.54.246.213 as permitted sender) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.162.41]) by bay0-omc3-s13.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:53:28 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:53:28 -0800 Message-ID: <[email protected]> Received: from 65.54.162.200 by by108fd.bay108.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:53:23 GMT X-Originating-IP: [207.6.209.233] X-Originating-Email: [[email protected]] X-Sender: [email protected] From: "David Magnus" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Bcc: Subject: Oh Philip Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:53:23 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2007 21:53:28.0010 (UTC) FILETIME=[BF98C2A0:01C73E6F] Return-Path: [email protected] Phil is a 16 year old child in Canada with no one to love him Please stop making fun of him _________________________________________________________________ Search for grocery stores. Find gratitude. Turn a simple search into something more. http://click4thecause.live.com/search/charity/default.aspx?source=hmemtagline_gratitude&FORM=WLMTAG
Apart from what is listed in the full headers above, I know nothing about the source of this email. I can't confirm that it is from Spawnopedia -- however, I have not received any email which identifies itself as being from Spawnopedia. I have no plans to respond to either of these messages, and have not done so. -- Kynn 23:18, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
PHIL- it does not show an email from me. for all we know Magus is his brother or something. Do not be fooled.
Spawnopedia 23:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
From : [email protected]
Sent : Monday, January 22, 2007 12:47 PM
To : <[email protected]>
Subject : re: Wikipedia
Go to previous message | Go to next message | Delete | Inbox
Hey Spawn, fact is that Hamsher just this weekend recovered from her THIRD bout with breast cancer and she doesn't need to see crap like what is on the article there. People like you stir it up and make me sick. Maybe you should get ill and that would teach you something.
That is where it all started. That is how I knew he knew Hamsher. That is when he attacked. He's playing everyone. Phil do you know how to get headers in hotmail?
Spawnopedia 23:52, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
What do you need? -- Sopoforic 23:38, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Nie będę cię uczył rozumu. Od tego masz rodziców. Chcę ci jednak powiedzieć że robisz bardzo przykre wrażenie, nierozważnego i niewychowanego. Nie powinieneś się brać za sprawy dorosłych. AS>
Umm, you reverted my accurate and well sourced edit to this page without even deigning to explain yourself. Please do so now. AZJustice 20:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Blogs (Unless written by a recognized authority) are not allowed per Wikipedia policy. It has been discussed on the talk page and that particular blog has mass spammed Wikipedia. Do not call my edits vandalism. Any links to that blog will continue to be reverted. Philip Gronowski Contribs 21:32, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
I know nothing about that Blog. I linked to a letter by the guy himself. That is a primary source and therefore valid. You need to be a little uptight and read things before deleting them.
AZJustice 22:42, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
I was libeled for removing links from Wikipedia because the site violated policy. Look at the current page of the blog, somewhere near the bottom; the text was changed from something a fair bit more offensive. Again, blogs that are not written by a recognized authority will be removed for violating that part of policy. It says pretty clearly in Links normally to be avoided that: "Links to blogs and personal webpages, except those written by a recognized authority." are to be avoided. There is also no proof that those are his words, the unrecognized authors merely say that they are. Philip Gronowski Contribs 01:30, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
How does the site [b] violate policy[/b]? and why should any external site care about Wikipedia policy? Are you saying that that letter is NOT from Bobby Beausoleil? Confused.
AZJustice 01:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Admitidely
WP:RS is not policy but as it says on the page, it is generally accepted among editors, I have never come across a time when this has been ruled out for only being a guideline. Look at the
WP:EL page again specifically the
links normally to be avoided section (specifically section 11). link you posted comes from a blog, therefore fails
WP:EL as there are no
reliable sources which show that this is definately a letter from
Bobby Beausoleil
RyanPostlethwaiteSee
the mess I've created or
let's have banter 02:50, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
I personally don't think this guy is a sock, he has different grammar and is not specifically spamming pages or anything. He seems to be a person who likes working on external links. Philip Gronowski Contribs 23:44, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
hi i wrote the marini page - its TRUE REALLY!! give me a day or so to scan some sources User:fresh_start 01:56 13 february 2007 (gmt)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 7 | 12 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
First of all, I appreciate your vigilance. However, I don't agree that the Quizlet article warrants speedy deletion. I appreciate the problem of insignificant webmasters trying to get publicity from Wikipedia (though I don't think it's too effective) by creating articles on small, unimportant websites. In case it helps bring this into context, I didn't create Quizlet, but merely use it. Considering it has been mentioned in Lifehacker, on Digg, etc., I thought it was fitting for there to be a Quizlet article on Wikipedia. Your thoughts would be appreciated on the article's talk page. » K i G O E | talk 00:13, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Then here is the criticism you need- what happens when somebody that you have annoyed on here finds you? You have given them more than enough information. Do people at your school know you are a Wikifool? Will girls like you when they find out you have crossed Col Scott? Will your dreams of fleeing Canada ever be fulfilled? Will Ryan Bushby save you if Murphy recruits an admin? Why do you think you matter? 16YearOldCanadianClown 08:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 8 | 19 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:28, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Philip - an explanation was given for every edit to that page. Before more changes are made let's investigate a point of clarity - Is it your intent to be directly responsible for the content on the Matt Furey wikipedia page? Is it your intent to be directly responsible for the changes and revisions you have made? Please respond immediately so that this can be resolved in the proper method.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.185.84.17 ( talk) 03:35, 27 February 2007 (UTC).
It is my intent that pages are kept to a certain standard of quality. I am responsible for all changes I have made. Most of your explanations were inadequate or wrong. This , for example, was not vandalism; as were many others which you said were. Blanking pages just because you disagree with something (the talk page for example) is another thing not to do. The page is heavily biased yes, but there are processes for that. Proper tags were left at the top of the page warning readers that the article was not neutral. Also, many of the things you added were almost spamish in appearance, there is no need for a product list. Philip Gronowski Contribs 03:49, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your response. Appropriate actions will be taken. Please keep this content in place.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 9 | 26 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:29, 27 February 2007 (UTC)