Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
I have just noticed that you have been removing maps from over 30 articles in the past month. These edits have been rolled back as the discussion you have cited for removing these maps is regarding only one of them. I can understand if you wanted to adhere to
WP:BRD by removing what you consider are unreliable files but you have been reverted now and it is time to discuss.
It is important to respect users works when reverting even if you may find them problematic. Outright reversion should be the last cause when trying to fix problems. Almost all of the files you have removed appear to be works of user Rr016. I am sure he can address your concerns about sourcing of these files.
You also appear to be a fairly new user, having joined Wikipedia some six months ago. I can assure you that most of these files have been added with consensus with multiple editors over the past decades. I would like to call in user EkoGraf on this issue, with whom I've been collaborating on multiple Syria related articles in the past. Ecrusized ( talk) 13:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
I deleted the map from the infobox as its source fails WP:RS. Of the later participants, none attempted to dispute that Suriyak maps was unreliable; indeed, most agreed with that sentiment. I interpreted this series of events as a consensus on the unreliability of a source, justifying additional map removals in the same vein. Looking back, the sheer number of articles that this affected definitely necessitated further discussion on WP:POINT grounds alone. Mea culpa.
unreliable,
basically some X account, a source in violation of WP:RS and WP:SPS, and even a
possible pro-Russian propaganda channel, as Ecrusized put it. It is possible said discussions predate newer recommendations at WP:RSPTWITTER, and this particular account being RS would definitely seem to be a prominent exception to the usual standards that even very experienced editors are accustomed to, considering the language I quoted.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Kherson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sack of Rome.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2nd Guards Motor Rifle Division, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Kyiv.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Melitopol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Territorial Defence Forces.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I saw a post you made on labelling events as phases? I meant to comment but I'm not sure I did? Please provide a link. Regards, Cinderella157 ( talk) 11:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Found it in an open tab hidden amongst all the rest on my to-do list. Cinderella157 ( talk) 12:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC)