This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 |
Hello! I've noticed you have protected 3 Power Rangers related articles in June, so over 3 months back, and mentionned to be asked permission for unprotecting them. Since it's been protected long enough, maybe we should give the articles a shot now. -- JForget 01:24, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm doing regular patrols to check-up for articles that have been protecting long enough. As per the policy, permanent protected pages can be un-protected after a certain period and I had discovered that lots of articles which had only been protected once were semi'd for several months despite the first occurrence, in some cases closer to one year, so I've thought to help on easing-up a bit that backlog and also per the policy which also states that the first protection shouldn't be too long (except likely for BLP violations, intense edit waring and sock puppetry).
Thanks for that!-- JForget 19:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello... you may or may not already be aware of this, but the IP you blocked a few days back ( 195.189.142.166) actually blocks users editing through the opera Mini browser for mobile phones. (I found this out when, despite being logged in under my username, I was blocked from editing. This was not the case only a few days previously.) If you're not aware of this, there is/was an AN discussion here. Thanks in advance for any help you can provide. -- Ckatz chat spy 08:51, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
[1] - ??? What does "db-banned" mean? 19:16, 5 October 2007 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.212.211.94 ( talk • contribs)
On the List of Power Rangers article, for some reason, on the Black Rangers section, Black Bison Ranger is italicized, without it being italicized, if you know what I mean. So, I was wondering if maybe you'd know why that is. CrystallixRed 23:47, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. It's fixed now. CrystallixRed 00:32, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
I have nominated WP:RFAR/NC ( | [[Talk:WP:RFAR/NC|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 16:15, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I just want to know why do you remove the Alpha/Omega letters in Agito's template but didn't remove similar characters in Ryuki, Faiz, Blade, Hibiki and Den-O templates. If Agito's case isn't suitable for a encyclopedia, I can't see why the others are. -- Black Condor 18:40, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you. I also disagree with the "AgitΩ" spelling, by the way. The idea of the Greek letters was only to illustrate the template, just like the kanji used in other Rider series. -- Black Condor 19:45, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Found this info that reveals more on the mysterious Long.
After the Kenma are defeated, Long takes over as the main villian. Furthermore, he's actually of the Genjuuken (幻獣拳, Genjūken, Phantom Beast Fist), a extremely evil offshoot of the Rinjuuken Akugata. Fractyl 17:26, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Furthermore, there's to be two characters based on Suzaku and Genbu coming soon. Fractyl 02:42, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
I see that you blocked this user. Yeah, I tried to warn him or her, but he or she just wouldn't listen. Either that, or they actually didn't read the messages left by a bot and by me. Flyer22 00:11, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Good afternoon, Ryulong. Are you closing discussions from the 10 Oct RfD discussion page? If so, we may be having edits which are stepping on each other. I saw several deletions which did not mention the RfD discussion but for which good-faith RfD discussions were on-going. Thinking that the deletion was being made as a speedy-deletion in ignorance of the RfD, I restored the pages (with a note in the RfD that the deletion should probably be interpreted as a "delete" opinion).
If you in fact were closing discussions, please overturn my action and re-delete. But please at least reference the RfD discussion in the edit summary so that any future editor will be able to find the discussion if necessary. Thanks. Rossami (talk) 21:01, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Currently requesting unblocking. Username blocked, with a hard block to prevent them from choosing another name, no less. What'd I miss? – Luna Santin ( talk) 23:43, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
You may also want to add HERMY??? and Talk:HERMY??? to the list of protected Grawp titles. TML 11:21, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Dear Ryolong,
I would like to post a article in english about a new musical genre. It's called Blacktro, I think you've heard of it since you already deleted one article about this before. I've made an article in Dutch, because it's an new music genre from Amsterdam. But I was wondering why this last page was deleted and what was on that page. Can I find this somewhere on wikipedia?
Thanks,
Wilm68 12:29, 17 October 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilm68 ( talk • contribs) 12:25, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
On the PR template (if that's the right name, I'm not sure), it has a link to the Quantum Ranger, which has since been merged with the Time Force Power Rangers. So I was wondering if that link is necessary, since both links take you to the same page. CrystallixRed 03:57, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
You deleted the dragon half manga page. I must have it back. Momomai 20:03, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
WP:ANI#User:Ryulong_block_review if you're interested. Carbon Monoxide 02:36, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
(ec) Hi, Ryulong - I got an e-mail from a user you indef-blocked (apparently because I was involved in your Request for Comment), asking for a block review. I'm no expert on the subject matter or the history of the issue so I posted it at WP:ANI here. Videmus Omnia Talk 02:38, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Ryulong, thanks for your intervention again. It looks like we can have serious discussions on the talk page again. However, it seems we forgot puppet User:Herbert Dingle himself. Up to now he always signed with parenteses around the "~~~~": here, here, here, here, here, here, here, but now suddenly (since you more or less gave away their signing behaviour), without parenteses. Also note the reason for his being here: "Hi! I'm an astronomer. My main interest is in pointing out the inconsistencies in Einstein's theories of relativity. Two clocks cannot possibly both run slower than each other, yet this is what Einstein's special theory of relativity implies. I intend to highlight this fact and also the fact that attempts to highlight it are suppressed." DVdm 09:04, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
It seems we have another one that slipped through the maze:
No Gyulong, you are now getting carried away with yourself. Swanzsteve has got nothing to do with myself or the Brigadier. It's pretty pathetic of you to conclude that everybody who is supporting Dingle must be the same person. Do you make the same conclusion regarding the fact that EMS and Denveron argue identically? Have you bothered to check them out yet? Why not block them anyway as you did with all the pro-Dingle users until the checkuser results come back. I don't think you'd make a very good detective. Sir Jamset G Jeejeeboy 10:06, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Yo,Ryu. I'm asking if I can have an alternate account: User:SASUKE.-- Xterra 1(talk) (Work) (Sign) 14:14, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Why'd you treat User:Ionas68224 with rude and unneccessafy comments? I mean, come on... he's had his own troubles in life. Why'd you make his life worse? And by the way, why aren't we allowed to use User:Ryulong/Clock on our own pages if we want to? 63.3.21.129 07:08, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
As a courtesy to Wikiproject Baseball's 2008 season articles group, could you please undelete 2008 New York Yankees season? Thanks. -- Michael Greiner 23:38, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you Ryulang for fixing my talk page. Cheers! Culv e rin ? —Preceding comment was added at 06:49, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
July 13, 2007 Ryulong (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "195.93.0.0/17 (Talk)" (anon. only) with an expiry time of indefinite {{ AOLblock}}) (Unblock)
Is this still valid? 195.93.21.67 is currently tagged as forwarding XFF headers now. You might want to get that confirmed by a CheckUser. Thanks. -- Netsnipe ► 03:56, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I just had a quick question about romanization standards. Is the standard to use ou for おう and oh for おお/おー? I know it's probably written somewhere, but I couldn't find anything specifically referencing that. -- Egocentrism04 17:46, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Checkuser evidence suggests that it is highly unlikely that User:Swanzsteve is running any sockpuppets, so I have unblocked him accordingly. -- Deskana (talk) 18:55, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
>>Thank you gentlemen, for a speedy resolution, Ryolung, in particular for an apology. All I would ask is that >>you announce this error/unblock on the Herbert Dingle Talk Page, in the same way you announced the block.
>>I'm pleased to see that the wiki checking procedures work - Swanzsteve 22:04, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
>>Retrieved from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Swanzsteve"
-- Swanzsteve 14:53, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
As to the real sockpuppeteer(s): Cui Bono? - the only beneficiary(ies) of this saga have been the Dingle-bashers, in particular Denveron, someone with a lot of time on his hands. During this period the article has been turned into a tirade against Dingle. This may seem slightly Machiavellian but it is worth considering. I suggest a similar sockpuppeteering check on the anti-Dingle editors. --- Swanzsteve 15:04, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
The only POV I am trying to push is a neutral POV. There was a consensus some time ago to avoid discussion within the article itself of "was Dingle right or wrong". Unfortunately this fell by the wayside with the appearance of Denveron and the Sockpuppets (sounds like band). Most of the main article is now little more than a list of people who thought Dingle was wrong and why. This result was always the intention of the anti-Dingle editors, some of whom, would prefer to include statements that he was suffering from dementia. So it is clear who has benefitted from this episode. I think it would do no harm to run sockpuppetry checks on them as well, then we would all know who was genuine and who was not. - Swanzsteve 19:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Ryulong - You may not have noticed in my entry above but I have requested that you announce this error/unblock on the Herbert Dingle Talk Page, in the same way you announced the block. - Swanzsteve 00:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I had found the Operation Overdrive page had been vandalized by someone who changed the names of the rangers, allies and villians but I cleaned it up and restored the page back to its normal look before the page was vandalized. Louis Marinucci 23:25, 24 October 2007 (UTC) RedLifeguardRanger
I want to say thanks for helping me clean up the section I was not happy that someone changed the names of the Rangers, Allies and Villians if I see that happen again I'm going to clean it up and report it to you lets forget what happened between us in the past and join forces to protect the pages from vanadals. Louis Marinucci 18:16, 26 October 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by RedLifeguardRanger ( talk • contribs)
Just to give you the heads up, PilotBob has placed cleanup tags on Goranger and Ogre Tribe Org. I can help with the Org page at least since my expertise are on Sentai Series that were adapted for Power Rangers. - Adv193 06:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Pilotbob just put in more tags for the Ogre Tribe Org and Power Animals section so I would like to ask how would you like to go about handling these issues should those pages need to be re-written. - Adv193 19:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
With the cleanup of the Gaoranger sections can we also use Sentai Jetman and Beyond's Goranger page [2] to help with sourcing since it covers the areas of Gaoranger that Sentai Spoilers did not cover such as writing in the episodes that Sentai Spoilers did not cover. - Adv193 21:31, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
I just added the link on three different pages and so that should cover the series for future references I will tell you two things I discovered that you should know about:
1. TV.com has a Super Sentai section and has contained summaries of all of the episodes placed out by TV Nihon as well as a few other series such as Zyuranger, Dairanger, and Abaranger though I doubt that we could use their data for Wikipedia.
2. Super Sentai.com doesn't completely copy material for this site I saw a few pages that did not copyright anything. They also have some episode summaries such as one for some of the series such as Dairanger, Magiranger, Boukenger, and Gekiranger. However I also found out through their forums that they do not have anyone running that site at the moment. - Adv193 22:04, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Can you review and unblock? thanks -StC
Hi. Although I didn't make the edit removing Auckland from the List of cities by surface area page, I've reverted it back to the changes made after mine. The reason for this is that Auckland is not actually a city, per se. Check out the talk page for the list and you'll see that under the London heading I mention how Auckland isn't actually a city (it's a metropolitan area/ conurbation). It seems that someone read that, realised Auckland was still on the list and removed it (which I should have done, I guess, but I didn't realise it was on there). kabl00ey 07:50, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Huh, I missed that AN/I round completely - just saw your edit to my User page. Thanks for taking care of all of it. Now he's hallucinating, on top of everything else. I never emailed him at all - he emailed me asking me to give him an award and I replied on his talk page. Tvoz | talk 09:16, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. I was wondering why you made this and this change. They don't seem to have any visible effect. The reason I'm asking is that I have (since before your changes) an editprotected request in the sandbox which conflicts with those changes. As your changes don't seem to have any visible effect, I'm tempted to recommend the sandbox still be applied as is. -- PEJL 07:46, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Your IP block has caught Thumperward ( talk · contribs) at 192.18.1.36 which resolves to gmp-ea-fw-1.sun.com. Are you sure that:
does not include the internal employees network at Sun? Your range blocking seems quite extreme when you could have contacted Sun's IT department to deal with abuses. -- Netsnipe ► 09:08, 29 October 2007 (UTC)