![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi,
we're doing this text in English now but I think that you may see it right now :) Lvova Anastasiya ( talk) 10:32, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Good day, in Austria the new Russian ambassador on March 9, 2010. Regards Император ( talk) 02:25, 30 June 2011 (UTC).
Could you please specify the deletion discussion where this page was originally deleted? - FASTILY (TALK) 06:53, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
A while back, I posted a new proposal for Tibetan naming conventions, i.e. conventions that can be used to determine the most appropriate titles for articles related to the Tibetan region. This came out of discussions about article titles on Talk:Qamdo and Talk:Lhoka (Shannan) Prefecture. I hope that discussions on the proposal's talk page will lead to consensus in favour of making these conventions official, but so far only a few editors have left comments. If you would be interested in taking a look at the proposed naming conventions and giving your opinion, I would definitely appreciate it. Thanks— Nat Krause( Talk!· What have I done?) 16:20, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
You asked and I left his userpage, but he goes to my articles and edits! See Tyko Vylka history!-- DissidentRUS ( talk) 17:23, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi Russavia!
Firstly I notice http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Druk_Air&diff=next&oldid=326568201 The problem is that the location of the corporate/administrative headquarters is not the same thing as the airline's main hub. Each airline's lead needs to state where the administrative HQ is. While many airlines have the HQ at the same airport as the main hub, some have their HQs at different airports ( Swiss International Air Lines), or in a city center ( United Airlines), or in a city not considered to be a hub ( Lufthansa).
If you are curious about the citation, from my understanding the lead is a better place for the citation than the infobox, and if a piece of info in the lead is not in the body of the article, it must be cited in the lead, even if it is non-controversial.
Also, after reading http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Druk_Air&diff=389719059&oldid=388305100 I think they could be useful. They may have things like information for nationals of a certain country regarding the airline, sale of tickets in local currencies, etc.
The website says that the agent's the only registered agent in the country of Singapore. Not sure if Druk Air's site has that info. WhisperToMe ( talk) 21:39, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
By motion voted upon at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment:
The remedies of the Eastern European mailing list and Russavia-Biophys cases are amended to permit bilateral interactions between User:Russavia and User:Miacek.
For the Arbitration Committee, Salvio Let's talk about it! 01:05, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
I made a picture of the Russian consulate in The Hague, the Netherlands referring to your request on the Dutch Wikipedia in 2009. The consulate has changed its location from Laan van Meerdervoort 1 to Scheveningseweg 2. And I made an extra picture of the entrance sign of the Russian consulate in The Hague. {{SUBST:User:Janaa/Signature2}} ( talk) 20:46, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Thought I'd post this here instead of at the noticeboard. I've had an IP vandalize my talk page once. Luckily King_of_Hearts happened to notice and revert it before I got to it a second later. However, thanks to this IP you are now qualified to use {{User:UBX/vandalized}} (a userbox) on your talk page. =) CycloneGU ( talk) 19:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello Russavia. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Micro-airlines, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7: Not an article about a website. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 03:10, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Rusavia
I wonder if you can help me. I am presenting a talk on Wikimania on Flagged Revisions and I would like to have screenshots of English patrolling interface because I think the audience would be distracted by Cyrillic if I did them from the Russian Wikipedia.
I would like to have:
My e-mail is mstislavl1atgmail.com
Thank you.-- Victoria ( talk) 10:48, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:The eXile logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:40, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Why did you do this? The content removed was a very poor machine translation, and tidying it without the original source would be very difficult, surely its better off stubbed and built up from that? Or are you planning on tidying it yourself?-- Jac16888 Talk 16:33, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Would you be able to share your thoughts at
Talk:Putin's Palace, regarding the {{npov}}
tag you applied? Thanks. —
Akrabbim
talk
18:40, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi Russavia! Hi are you doing? Could you please take a look at [ (see the bottom)]. Maybe I'm wrong but I don't think my statement is synthesis. Take care! Denghu ( talk) 06:53, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Ambassadors of Russia to Thailand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ambassadors of Russia to Thailand until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
Thanks for uploading File:Sevenair logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:42, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
G'day, can you swing by IrAero Flight 103 and read the Russian sources to see whether there were 12 deaths or 12 persons injured? Thanks and cheers YSSYguy ( talk) 08:03, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello! You are assessing new WP:RUSSIA articles, but could you add task force parameters as well? Perhaps they should be added to AssessorTags. GreyHood Talk 11:04, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
How is [1] any more free then [2]. They are both non-free covers of a product label? — xaosflux Talk 02:56, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
Perth Meetup
Other events:
|
![]() |
There is a meetup happening this weekend in Perth, if you're interested. (You're in Category:Wikipedians in Perth.) — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 07:58, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I am just wondering why you have removed Air China Cargo from the category Cargo airlines please? Thanks -- JetBlast ( talk) 19:23, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Submitted [3]. -- Martin Tammsalu ( talk) 07:41, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
I know that the bolding of NATO names for Soveit/Russian aircraft is a an issue with you. However, The aircraft stlye guide now mandates that we need to bold those names. This change was made because the WP MOS states that alternate names should be bolded, and WPAIR was forced to change the previous quotes format to bolding by the MOS-"enforcers". I'll try to find the discussion for you to read, and so you'll know where to contest this if you want to. But please don't remove the existing boldings fromthe title lines of aircraft articles until the WP MOS is changed to allow it to be unbolded. Thanks. - BilCat ( talk) 21:16, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
I did find the relevant discussion, but it seems I "mis-remembered" the details of the discussion. The discussion is at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft/Archive 24#NATO reporting names in Russian military aircraft articles, and the MOS-enforcers were not involved. (I was thinking of other disputes where they were involved in enforcing MOS guidelines.) The discussion should be self-explanatory, and of course you're free to raise the issue again at WT:AIR if you desire. - BilCat ( talk) 21:50, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi Russavia.. I noticed you making some changes to Asin Thottumkal 2011.jpg pic.. Can u explain me why and what was that.. What am i supposed to do?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vijay536 ( talk • contribs) 13:00, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Oh thank u.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vijay536 ( talk • contribs) 13:09, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
I believe this image to be non-free content that has significant rationale for being on the page.
Also, what are the chances that this article would be deleted? I would not want to see it deleted and would like to know what I could do to preserve it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Straight.edge3kk ( talk • contribs) 16:06, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Alex discussion ★ 21:16, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey, I replied you some time ago...
Even Libyan thematic is currently more actual, the Congolese entity left also the great consequences in history of its state. I supports equality in this case. Alex discussion ★ 14:39, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
I would still listen to any ideas you may have that allow you and the EEML people to avoid running into each other and produce less drama overall. From the discussion at AE and at User talk:T. Canens, I sense you are indignant that anyone could see you as being at fault. (Well in this particular case the other guy made a personal attack, so forget that for a moment; I'm referring to you and Tammsalu getting along in the future). I'm not sure the overall problem is anyone's fault long term, but any small flash of creative suggestion would not be amiss. EdJohnston ( talk) 02:37, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Ed, before one can discuss things like this, we have to acknowledge why it is we as editors are even present on the project. As I state on User:Russavia, and which I will repeat here:
My presence on English Wikipedia is for one purpose and one purpose only. To participate in a collegial environment, with the community goal of building a free Encyclopaedia.
My interests, and where much of my editing is focused, is on the following topics:
In terms of Russia's foreign relations and its place in the world, one can't consider the foreign relations of Russia, without considering Estonia-Russia relations, which then has to consider many factors such as Occupation of the Baltic States, Russians in Estonia, human rights in Estonia, and down the chain it goes. Or let's look at Russophobia, which is a major part of how Russia is seen in the world. One can't consider modern Russophobia without considering Poland-Russia relations, or the Great Game, or the Testament of Peter the Great. It is impossible to only edit on the current, when the history also has to be taken into account.
But if you were to look at my contributions, you will see that in addition to editing almost anything to do with Russia, I also do a lot of the following:
So my editing is all over the place, and doesn't really follow any set pattern.
You can also see a big list of articles, in various stages of development, that I am working on (some of them it seems I've been doing so forever) at User:Russavia#Currently_working_on.
Ed, in relation to this on your talk page, I have scrubbed almost all of what I was going to write, as it was going to be the end result of what I was going to suggest. I will say that "dividing up Estonia" would not be a solution that I would go for, because as far as both myself and Tammsalu are concerned, to do so would be detrimental to both myself and him, due us both being in good standing, with the only restriction being the interaction ban. Detrimental as it would prevent article development and improvement on articles clearly within our editing interests, which could be off limits if Estonia was carved up.
So long as interactions were concentrated on content, and comments by either editor were only on content, with commenting on editors themselves (in any way shape or form) still being prohibited, I would have no problem, as stated several times, to the lifting of the interaction ban albeit with "a content only" specification. Additionally, it may be worthwhile in having a WP:1RR limit placed.
Also, I would support the lifting of the interaction restriction in relation to myself and EEML, with the exception of User:Vecrumba and User:Volunteer Marek, whom I would not feel comfortable in having those bans lifted due to obvious events.
Comments welcome. -- Russavia Let's dialogue 08:43, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Maybe you should look at the edit history of this article, before doing the drive-by tagging on my talkpage. User:E-Kartoffel is who you need to speak to and he's over there -----------> Lugnuts ( talk) 13:41, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
It is commonly named Russian Cultural Center (see category:Russian Cultural Centers). There is no source that provides official translation. But, center of same kind is in Washington, and it's called just RCC. Alex discussion ★ 12:31, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
I've put off proposing how to close this AE request in the hope that you and I would reach agreement. If you no longer wish to pursue lifting one of the interaction bans, then I'll go back to Plan B, which most likely would be a topic ban from certain Baltic issues. A ban would apply to you, Tammsalu or both to reduce the possibility that the two of you will be editing the same articles. If you still want to pursue lifting the interaction ban, then I need your response to the proposed wording at User talk:EdJohnston#Draft amendment. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 13:56, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
I was going by the fact that more sources seem to spell her name Elena in English and imdb also spells it like that. Can you translate the filmography from Russian wiki, it also has her stage performances.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:53, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment#Request to amend prior case: Russavia-Biophys. You are invited to add your own statement there. Since we have discussed this previously, my assumption is that you would favor lifting the ban. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 18:48, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed your request for a photo of the Russian Centre of Science and Culture in Chisinau, a building I frequently pass by when in the city. The guard was kind enough to let me into the fenced area and make a pic that is now available here. Judging by the size of the articles this photo is requested for, I rather doubt it will be of use anytime soon, but hey. -- illythr ( talk) 21:41, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() | On 5 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lesotho–Russia relations, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Lesotho–Soviet relations suffered a setback after the January 1986 overthrow of Basotho Prime Minister Leabua Jonathan by Justin Lekhanya? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lesotho–Russia relations.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 08:03, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
I was in the midst of protecting Ruslan Salei and reverting to pre-crash version due to conflicting reports when another editor used this link to cite that he has died. I figure you might be a good authority to determine if this site is reliable or not. Thanks, Reso lute 15:08, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Are you online? I'd like to chat if that's ok. - Canadian Bobby ( talk) 17:53, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Whilst there is definitely doubt over Oman's recognition of Kosovo, it is very clear that Guinea-Bissau recognised. We have seen the note verbale. No doubt whatsoever. Therefore it should not be moved to the Disputed Recognition section. Bazonka ( talk) 08:08, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Please join in the discussion and avoid drive by reverting that increases the disruption - thanks - Off2riorob ( talk) 19:52, 4 September 2011 (UTC)