This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of List of characters in the Camp Half-Blood series, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: List of Percy Jackson & the Olympians characters. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 04:09, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
You are at risk of violating WP:3RR at Chaos War, with two other editors independently objecting to your wholesale reversion of an article whose current edit was the result of long discussion on its talk page. I encourage you to use the talk page rather than continue what appears to be an edit war. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 02:16, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give
List of Percy Jackson & the Olympians characters a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "
cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the
page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history. In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the
"Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a
redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at
requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at
Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you.
VernoWhitney (
talk) 15:06, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for writting those summaries, it really improved the article.-- WikiEditor44 ( talk) 23:06, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
I strongly do support your efforts to improve Wikipedia, but, seriously, Dave A, and Tenebrae, they've known each other far too long here, and obviously they have become seriously biased in their own editing. It is not fair, and they have no authority at all to decide this all by themselves, just because they like their own version. The Chaos War page is truly ruined. They can assure each other that they've done everyone here a great favor by erasing all our edits, but it's just arrogant to force their combined edits over those of others here. I've tried to reason with David civilly, but all he has done is further insult and degrade me, and he has gotten in arguments with many fellow editors here in the past. I do not know what to do now; what do you think should be done? Aidoflight ( talk) 18:54, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
You have been advised on several occasions that the characters you identify as Bromwell Stikk and T.O. Morrow are not identified by those names in the episode. Absent a reliable source that confirms that the on-screen characters are Stikk and Morrow, identifying them as such is original research. Review the episode for yourself and you'll see that they are not named as you claim. Please stop disrupting the article by inserting unsourced, unverified information. Thank you. Orrin Knox ( talk) 21:20, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
A certain user is attempting to delete the One-Above-All article. I have pleaded with him to reconsider, but he refuses. Can you please participate on the current discussion, for if this user has his way, he will most certainly have the article deleted. Aidoflight ( talk) 21:23, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Can you please stop linking to Aqualad (Jackson Hyde) on the Young Justice articles? It's not the same character. -5- ( talk) 18:57, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Mac Gargan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
-5- (
talk) 19:27, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Hey, your work on the Age of X article has added a lot of useful information, but it needs references to the specific issues where this information is learned. You'll want to use the <ref>''ComicBookTitle'' #IssueNumber</ref> template as a way to replace the {{Issue|date=February 2011}} tags. The sooner you do this the easier it will be since you'll have an easier time remembering what issue that took place in. (I would do it, but I haven't read any of this storyline.) Spidey 104 18:25, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an
edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to
Skull Island. Also, please note that Wikipedia articles should not include contractions per
WP:TONE. Thank you. --
Doniago (
talk) 15:44, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Don't forget to use [[Category:Power Rangers Samurai]] at the bottom of the new pages you're making. And also, do not capitalize every word in a section header unless it is a proper noun.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 19:15, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
The article Villains in Power Rangers Samurai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Hasteur (
talk) 13:41, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Villains in Power Rangers Samurai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Villains in Power Rangers Samurai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hasteur ( talk) 15:44, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without
verifying it by citing
reliable sources, as you did to
2012 (film). Before making any potentially controversial
edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --
Doniago (
talk) 13:19, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, your recent edits to the
2012 (film) plot summary added a significant amount of unneeded detail and have been reverted. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You are welcome to use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and may read the
plot summary
edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for
films,
musicals,
television episodes,
anime/manga,
novels and
non-fiction books. Thank you. --
Doniago (
talk) 13:19, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the
plot summary
edit guides, as you did at
2012 (film). You may wish to review the specific guidelines for
films,
musicals,
television episodes,
anime/manga,
novels and
non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use
the sandbox. Thank you. --
Doniago (
talk) 17:05, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Fortdj33 (
talk) 03:25, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
The article Ralph Votrian has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Hrafn
Talk
Stalk(
P) 06:33, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an
edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for
vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you.
GoingBatty (
talk) 00:35, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Rtkat3. Why did you remove this citation information from the Fear Itself article? Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 01:02, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Hey. I hope you don't mind my asking, but can you add the citation, or publication information for the books you cited? I'd do it myself, but I'm not following all the titles, so I don't have the all the books. You can use the comic cite template that's already in the article, or get it from here. Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 03:57, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Rtkat3, I want to commend you and thank you for collaborating with me on the Fear Itself article. I really appreciate your additions of much of the tie-in material, and for answering my questions. So I hope you don't take it wrong when I strongly suggest that you not add any material that is not necessary for a reader's understanding of the story.
What we have to do is envision how someone who doesn't know anything about comics or this story in particular will react if they read the article. Anything that does not assist in the function of summarizing for them the story should not be in the article. Since the Synopsis section is already so long, and bound to get longer as the full crossover runs it course, we really have to think about including only the absolutely more vital info. Specifically:
Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 15:40, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Rtkat3, please stop adding material to the Fear Itself article that does not help the reader understand the plot. Mentioning that someone is watching a fight on a monitor, as with these edits of yours here and here, are not needed to understand what takes place in the books. We're summarizing what happens by including the most important details only. Nightscream ( talk) 01:08, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Please stop removing the out-universe opening line from the Deadpool passage. When writing about fiction, Wikipedia requires us to write about it in as much of an out-universe manner as possible. Because the Deadpool book is so different in tone from the rest of the crossover, it is for that reason that I not only made that note, but placed it at the end of the Synopsis section, to set it apart from the rest. I intend to edit in more out-universe as I continue to pare down the synopsis to remove the detail blot and summarize the basic info. Thanks.
Also, do you understand that when you writing "3,000 people have committed suicide following that global broadcast" doesn't make any sense because readers do not know what broadcast you're talking about? Is it so difficult to read what you write and imagine how it reads for someone who hasn't read the book?
The new Ghost Rider is volume 6, not 7, according to Midtown Comics' website, right here. If you have a source that contradicts this, and is more reliable than MC, then please provide it.
Lastly, sentences cannot begin with the word "yet". You're using it as a conjunction, and conjunctions do not begin sentences. Nightscream ( talk) 03:45, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
First, you don't have to start a new section with a heading every time you post on my talk page. Sections and headings are to separate discussions. They are not needed for individual posts. I've merged the five Fear Itself sections you created into one section, so you can place your messages there.
I'm not sure what you're taking about with "tie-ins", since I never mentioned anything about tie-ins in my recent messages to you, unless this is some oblique reference to the Iron Man material I brought up. The section in question we're discussion pertains to the synopsis of the core miniseries, and thus, it should only summarize material in that miniseries. Anything not in it or mentioned in it doesn't belong in it. In FI #5, Odin has not granted Iron man the use of his workshops, period.
"Some of the tie-ins were from the previews provided by Comic Book Resources which I start in hopes that anyone who reads them might spice it up more since no one barely starts theirs on the day of the first release." I'm sorry, but I have no idea what you're trying to say here. If you could please restate this in something resembling coherent English, I'd be more than happy to respond to it.
"As for "Fear Itself" #5, there was a full synopsis somewhere like the spoilers." If you read a spoiler somewhere published in some other source, then you should've cited it. You didn't. You instead cited the issue itself, and there is obviously no synopsis or spoiler in Fear Itself #5, since it makes no sense for a comic book to provide a synopsis or spoiler of content that's in that very issue. If you didn't get this material from the book, then why did you cite the book as your source? You do realize that WP:V, WP:CS, et al., requires us to indicate the source from which the material we add to articles is derived, don't you?
The only thing in the issue that could be called a "synopsis" would be the summary that explains to the reader the events in the previous issues, and obviously, there is no mention of Odin giving Stark the use of his workshops. Why would there be, if Stark is asking Odin for this for the very first time in this issue. Again, do you or do you not read these things that you write before you save them? Does any of what you just said really make sense to you? If you read some synopsis or spoiler somewhere, why not cite it in the article? Why not link me to it here? And if you indeed meant the "story so far" summary on page 1, why not have it in front of you when composing these messages, so you don't end up saying such questionable things?
"I was even surprised that the Serpent has his own hammer which was strong enough to break Captain America's shield." One more time: The Serpent broke the shield with his BARE HANDS. He did not use his hammer. Again, if you bought that issue, why not open it up to check this before saying things like this?
"For future references, you might want to start a seperate "Fear Itself" talk backs on my page like I did here." You mean you want me to create a new individual section for each message I leave you? Please clarify. Nightscream ( talk) 02:33, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed
your edit to the template. I assume you did it to avoid the redirect?
I've been ruminating on the thought that, in this situation,
Captain (land) or
Captain (army) may be less cryptic than
Captain (OF-2).
On-the-other-hand, given that the usage is [[Captain (xxxx)|Captain]], it doesn't really matter what the "xxxx" is, so you may as well use OF-2 and avoid the redirect.
What do you think? Cheers,
Pdfpdf (
talk) 16:06, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Hey, just thought I'd point out that it's much more polite to leave edit summaries when changing someone's edits, especially when you've done it multiple times and they've left detailed edit summaries every time and you've left none. Just sayin'. Thanks! DeadpoolRP ( talk) 20:00, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the
plot summary
edit guides, as you did at
G.I. Joe: The Movie. You may wish to review the specific guidelines for
films,
musicals,
television episodes,
anime/manga,
novels and
non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use
the sandbox. Thank you. --
Doniago (
talk) 14:14, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Do not add the visual bases for the Nighloks on Villains in Power Rangers Samurai. Within the coverage of Power Rangers, any sort of linkage to any Japanese boogieman or actual sea creature is original research. Do not add them back again because none of this can be confirmed.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 18:10, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Do not bold "First Appearance" and "Voice Actor". Why do you think I went through all the trouble of removing the bold formatting?— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 22:30, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
The article List of magical characters in The Life and Times of Juniper Lee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer,
his otters and a clue-bat • (
Otters want attention) 20:59, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Page-Pagter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Page-Pagter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 17:27, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that Scott_Page-Pagter has been nominated for deletion and was wondering if you wouldn't mind voting to Keep Michael Bruggink in exchange for my voting to Keep Scott_Page-Pagter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kthapelo ( talk • contribs) 19:45, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey, considering all of your work to improve the "The Gauntlet" and "Grim Hunt" article I wanted to ask your help improving the recently created Spider-Man: Big Time article. Spidey 104 14:26, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the three articles are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. Fractyl ( talk) 16:56, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Someone's wants to merge all the character pages together. Fractyl ( talk) 04:10, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article
Sesame Street Muppets, please cite a
reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of
verifiability. See
Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Christine (
talk) 03:35, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Christine ( talk) 17:41, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Both the Digimon Adventure version and the DATS version are being considered for deletion. 72.184.129.252 ( talk) 17:49, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Rtkat3, I reverted your edits to this article because the lists you included could never be complete. That's what the character lists are for. It also makes the both the body of the article and the infobox way too long. As far as the heading you changed is concerned, its GAN reviewers suggested it, so I'm loathe to change it. Eventually, I want to submit the article to FAC; my experience with the process tells me that the reviewers there would agree with me. I'm open to a discussion about it, though. Christine ( talk) 12:32, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello there. Although the "List of Enemies in God of War" page was deleted, please don't take it personally as that was a consensus decision. Just advising I'm going to try my hand at one or two comic articles that fall under the DC Comics banner, and note you have worked on them. Once again, if I make a change it is not personal. Regards Thebladesofchaos ( talk) 01:38, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Your opinion on what would be the best photo for the Infobox in the Grant Morrison article is requested here. If you could take the time to participate, it would be greatly appreciated, but if you cannot, then disregard; you don't have to leave a note on my talk page either way. Nightscream ( talk) 01:33, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Please take a look at {{ visible anchor}} and how it works. Your edits are invalidating their use in the article for 0 benefit.
Also keep in mind that the descriptions are supposed to be short and clean. Not full story synopses or peppered with preening prose.
And yes, there's a lot of clean up of your previous edits needed.
- J Greb ( talk) 18:28, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
The article Crisis Empire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Neelix (
talk) 17:04, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Minor barnstar |
for your work in List of characters in the Percy Jackson and the Olympians series and in the Heroes of Olympus series. The new paragraph being added for each character was probably tedious, but you did it! pluma ( talk) 22:17, 20 August 2011 (UTC) |
The article Adventures in Voice Acting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Drmies (
talk) 16:38, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adventures in Voice Acting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adventures in Voice Acting until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies ( talk) 01:47, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Please read the edit summary of my last edit on that article. I never mentioned referencing as a rationale for it. Aside from that, the "unlikely partnership" passage from your subsequent revert was unreferenced. Nightscream ( talk) 03:02, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crisis Empire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crisis Empire until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Neelix ( talk) 03:22, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an
edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for
vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you.
JDDJS (
talk) 15:05, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I've seen your previous edits on Transformers: Prime. I don't know if the article needs a cast or crew section. Couldn't the cast be merged into the characters and locations section and the crew into the production section, like previously? I am asking this because articles that really stand out such as My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic and Young Justice (TV series) do not have additional sections for cast and crew. Many articles do have these sections but characters and cast can probably be merged. WikiEditor44 ( talk) 16:54, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Rtkat3, I don't know where you get your ideas on writing or language from, but your choices in your last edit are poor.
Can you explain these passages:
Thanks, I forgot about that. I hate it when I forget the plot of a previous month's issue. Nightscream ( talk) 16:15, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
The article Badan Empire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Neelix (
talk) 02:03, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
The article Gel-Shocker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Neelix (
talk) 14:08, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
The article Thinker (DC Comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Jfgslo (
talk) 05:16, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Houngan (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Houngan (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Simone ( talk) 11:03, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Remember, when you write about events that happen in a fictional setting, always refer to the events in the fictional setting in the present tense (unless it is an event that has happened prior to the events of the fictional setting).— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 22:44, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Looking at these 2 edits of yours:
What you did defeats the purpose of either PRODing or AFDing an article. J Greb ( talk) 22:25, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Why did you de-link Sam Lane's name? Nightscream ( talk) 06:57, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Ron Ritzman ( talk) 22:48, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
The article Bolphunga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Jfgslo (
talk) 02:47, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
The article Javelin (DC Comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Jfgslo (
talk) 03:01, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
The article Shark (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Jfgslo (
talk) 03:08, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
The article Puppeteer (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Jfgslo (
talk) 03:18, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
The article Trinity (comics character) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Jfgslo (
talk) 04:45, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
The article Angle Man has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Jfgslo (
talk) 05:06, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
The article Olympian (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Jfgslo (
talk) 05:16, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that you replaced the PROD tags of Puppeteer (comics), Javelin (DC Comics), Shark (comics) and Bolphunga with AfD tags, but you have not completed the AfD process. Are you planning to complete the nominations? Otherwise I will remove the AfD tags after 24 hours. Jfgslo ( talk) 06:40, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
What's up withe the addition of ( L-2) in the Young Justice article? - Jack Sebastian ( talk) 16:14, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
I would prefer if you, instead of reverting out cited information, contribute to an ongoing discussion in article talk. Thanks. - Jack Sebastian ( talk) 00:32, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
A few things:
- J Greb ( talk) 22:34, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Rtkat3! I noticed that you have encountered the same individual that has been plaguing articles with fake credits for many months: you reverted them here and partially here when you took out this edit. You also got rid of his attempt to cast Alec Baldwin (one of his many targets) in the cast of that TV show here.
The reason I bring this up is because this vandal is so prolific and determined that a page has been created to keep track of the many IPs he is known to have used: please see User:Doc9871/Voice Cast Vandal. If you are aware of any other IPs similar to these please feel free to add to the page. I'm extremely familiar with this editor's M.O., so in the unlikely event that an IP is misidentified I would correct it. Cheers, and Happy Editing! Doc talk 00:07, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
I have seen ThunderCats Wiki. I would like ThunderCats. Tlsonic214 ( talk • contribs) 01:37pm, November 15 2011 (UTC)
Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.
Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:18, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
The article Kamen Rider World has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Neelix (
talk) 03:23, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Please remember that The Amazing Spider-Man is the full/proper title for that comic book series and don't remove "The" in the future. Thanks. Spidey 104 21:18, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Please take another look at WP:PLOT and WP:CMOS at what is the acceptable level of plot to add to articles. What you added to T. O. Morrow is unneded and unacceptable.
Also... The henchmen sections you added to Joker (comics), Catwoman, and Penguin (comics) are non-notable trivia. These types of sections have no reason to be in a Wikipedia article, full stop.
Please, exercise restraint when adding plot sections or details to articles. And refrain from adding trivia.
Thanks,
- J Greb ( talk) 00:19, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced material to articles, as you did with these edits to Chemo (comics), in particular the action figure material. In addition, please compose your material in the form of coherent sentences. Thank you. Nightscream ( talk) 00:51, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Frankly there are very, very limited cases where it is acceptable to edit another editor's post.
There was no reason for you to touch my post to Nightscream. I'm sorry if you didn't like how I formatted it, but that means you live with it, not change it.
- J Greb ( talk) 01:04, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. In Bizarro, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Wraith ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
I am sorry, but you cannot include information about Secret or identify Harm as being the characters from the normal DCU without specifically and explicitly citing them via reliable secondary sources. Your observations and subsequent synthetic connecting of them cannot be used in the article. I've reverted it, and request that, should you wish to discuss the matter, you should initiate discussion on the article talk page. - Jack Sebastian ( talk) 21:12, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Episode tables are part of the broadcast history of a TV series and should be in the "broadcast" section, not sandwiched between the "production" and "cast" sections, as you've done twice to Terra Nova (TV series) now. [1] [2] According to MOS:TV, the cast section immediately follows the production section. It makes it impossible to understand your reasoning behind putting this section out of place when you don't use edit summaries. Could you please start using them? -- AussieLegend ( talk) 05:54, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Munster, Go Home!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Debbie Watson ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:38, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Dinosaur Train, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Byrnes ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:29, 31 December 2011 (UTC)