1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26 · 27 · 28 · 29 · 30 · 31 · 32 · 33 · 34 |
Hey, you have got a mail. AdjustShift ( talk) 16:11, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:22, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
for the Barnstar. much appreciated.
--
L
I C
16:41, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. Delivered automatically by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 15:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
I noticed you created new stub articles for taluks in Tiruvallur district.Is there any specific need for taluk articles? What would they contain? I feel the content exist can very well exist in the main article itself Srikanth ( speak) 08:24, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 12:30, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 05:46, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Oiii. Infoboxes, coordinates, stub templates, coord missing templates??? Dr. Blofeld White cat 12:07, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 05:08, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
I have created a page with some information about Maharajah of Pithapuram, Surya Rau Bahadur. Can you help me improve the article.Dr. Rajasekhar A. 13:00, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Dharmapuri district.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. B ( talk) 01:18, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
good to see that retired sign gone. -- L I C 14:36, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:43, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
I happened upon the article on Brahmins by chance and found it to be a shambles. I wonder whether you would be interested in helping me sort it out. Hope to hear from you. Voltigeur ( talk) 19:32, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Not a problem at all. Contact me at [email protected]. I am rather remiss with my correspondence. As long as you don't mind a few delays in your correspondence, I would be more than glad to hear from you. Voltigeur ( talk) 11:26, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Actor Srinivsan's grandson Yogi is in List of Iyengars. I have heard that the legendary comedian was a Mudaliar. But i don't have any citations--Suresh 10:44, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:KarnatakaBank.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot ( talk) 23:14, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
I've replied on my talk page. Have a nice day! AdjustShift ( talk) 16:15, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Amrutanjan advertisement 1910.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:22, 28 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat ( talk) 05:22, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Is there a scientific basis for the following point given in Iyers article? - "However, genetic researches have found little difference in genetic patterns with the rest of the Tamil populace.".
The following two research publications is what the genetic researchers have found in this regard.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8754259 HLA affinities of Iyers, a Brahmin population of Tamil Nadu, South India., Balakrishnan, K., Pitchappan, R. M., Suzuki, K., Kumar, U. S., Santhakumari, R. and Tokunaga, K., Unit of Immunogenetics, School of Biological Sciences, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, India; Human Biology. 68 (4) pp. 523-37, August, 1996.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3424332 HLA antigens in South India: II. Selected caste groups of Tamil Nadu, Rajasekar, R., Kakkanaiah, V. N. and Pitchappan, R. M., Department of Immunology, School of Biological Sciences, Madurai Kamaraj University, India; Tissue Antigens. 30(3):113-8, September 1987.
NOTE:
1. Indians are a mixed race and there is no concept of racial purity anywhere in India. Almost none of the castes in the whole of India can be categorized as purely Aryan or Dravidian. In fact even the Tamil population cannot be classified as a racially distinct population from the population in states like UP or elsewhere - as they all share common genes - Aryan as well Dravidian. What makes the difference is only the ratio of Aryan genes vs Dravidian genes, purity of Y chromosome (male/paternal ancestry) etc. Some Indians have Aryan:Dravidian ratio of 80:20 and some 20:80 - that is all.
2. The Iyer population has both Aryan and Dravidian features. But a significant section of them have dominant Aryan features which are normally distinguishable from the rest of Tamil populace - this is common knowledge. This is also proved by scientific research (as quoted above). Though this research has been done on Iyers of Madurai it holds good for all other Iyers too - as there is strong intermarriage tradition between Iyers across Tamil Nadu and even Kerala.
3. The aim of this piece of information is not to spread racial hatred but just to make sure that Wikipedia should serve as a source of undiluted truth. If a truth is bitter can it be changed or rewritten or suitably modified to suit our tastes?
4. Racial hatred is an intolerance caused by our own belief systems and is internal to our minds. Just because a person is racially different from us, does not mean that we should hate him/her. "Unity in diversity" is the way to go - but this unity cannot be based on REJECTING the diversity which exists (by artificially homogenizing it on paper) but in ACCEPTING that differences exist and believing that these differences are a part of a rich and diverse ecosystem.
- Geneash ( talk) 07:34, 01 September 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 04:05, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Coimbatore district.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sherool (talk) 00:11, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
In the page List of Chief Ministers of Orissa you made a revision as of 08:48, 22 March 2009 that added a ref tags that has caused a cite error. Could you go back and fill out the full source information? Thanks. 75.69.0.58 ( talk) 22:14, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:G. Subramania Iyer.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:33, 16 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat ( talk) 05:33, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
The menace is back at work at Vadama. I suggest that it is time to get the article permanently locked for unregistered users. I hope to hear from you. Voltigeur ( talk) 17:07, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
I have reverted your move of the article to Iyengār, since:
If you still think that a move would be a good idea, we can discuss it on the article talk page. In general, it is best to discuss potentially controversial moves prior to implementing them. Cheers. Abecedare ( talk) 02:04, 18 September 2009 (UTC)