Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

You need to give more info as to what significant things he's done. The ToI link is a strong one, can you find more coverage like that of his career? Add some key facts about his accomplishments, and cite them to reputable sources. Then click Resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RajDlitaP and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:RajDlitaP, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas ( talk) 22:01, 7 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, RajDlitaP! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas ( talk) 22:01, 7 February 2018 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RajDlitaP is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RajDlitaP until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spike 'em ( talk) 09:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on RajDlitaP requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Applies G4. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subhash Ware Same pesron with different page title. An AfC draft was declined recently.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —usernamekiran (talk) 11:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Generally speaking, a Wikipedia article should have a link to another article only if that second article has content which is likely to help a reader of the first one to better understand it, or to give further information relating to its subject. A link should not be introduced to an article which is irrelevant just because there is a mention of its subject. For example, linking from the article Suresh Prabhu to India serves no useful purpose at all: the article India contains no information at all about Suresh Prabhu, nor are readers of the article likely to need to follow such a link in order to find out what "India" means. The same applies to linking an article about a politician to the article politician. Not only are irrelevant links unhelpful, but they can actually be harmful, as they often make it difficult for readers to know which links are relevant and which aren't, resulting in wasting time checking links that turn out to be irrelevant. Furthermore, it is considered unhelpful to have multiple copies of the same link in an article. Thus, for example, the article Suresh Prabhu already had a link to India in its very first sentence, so if anyone needed to use that link they could easily do so, without having another link in the next sentence. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 12:45, 10 February 2018 (UTC) reply