Hi again, QueenPuck! UK copyright law is sort of strange in allowing a person who copies a public-domain image to claim copyright in their copy (
maybe). Wikipedia ignores this, as it would be insanely complicated to actually try and figure out who photographed or scanned every public-domain image and whether they did so in the UK. For more background, see
National Portrait Gallery and Wikimedia Foundation copyright dispute. Please don't worry about this; it is not every editor's job to understand and reconcile international inconsistencies in copyright law. As a Wikipedia editor, when the Wikimedia Foundation defends its own policies, it implicitly defends you; in the very unlikely case that anyone complains, you can and should dump the whole issue on the WMF, and let them reply on your behalf.
Uploading images etc. to Wikimedia Commons instead of the English-language Wikipedia lets people speaking other languages find and use them more easily (and makes no difference to how you use them here). You can upload to Commons using
Commons:Special:UploadWizard. If the license won't let it be uploaded to Commons, the wizard will tell you first thing, so it's generally worth trying Commons first. If you accidentally upload something to Wikipedia instead, there will be a tab at the top of ther file page which says "Export to Wikimedia Commons"; if you click on it another wizard will transfer it automatically.
Lots of wizards, welcome to Oz!
HLHJ (
talk) 02:04, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
reply
- @
HLHJ
- I was actually agonizing over whether to upload the images of
Mary, Countess of Buccleuch and her husband,
Walter, to the Commons or directly onto Wikipedia. The actual site whence I retrieved the image (
[1]) said it can be used under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. I knew that, as the book in which the images appear was published in the late 1800s, the images are technically in the public domain, but I did worry about breaking a copyright rule by ignoring the licence provided by the site.
- If I am understanding you correctly, I should change these images to "public domain" and export them to the Commons? Is there a limit to how many of these images I can upload to the Commons, as there are several wonderful depictions of various Scottish nobles that would certainly enhance their corresponding articles on Wikipedia.
- Also, may I just ask for your advice in relation to another issue on here? There is a Wikipedia user who is clearly an employee (whether paid or unpaid) of the
Musée des ondes Emile Berliner and has failed to declare it. They are making changes to numerous articles, with their only contribution being (often irrelevant and tangential) mentions of the museum; please see
here. They have clearly been asked to promote the museum, but I know from reading posts on the Teahouse that that is actually prohibited on here. I thought about reaching out to them, but I feel, as a beginner, it is not really my place. Also, I would hate to make someone feel unwelcome, as they probably do not know that what they are doing is not appropriate. Do you have any advice as to how to proceed?
- Thank you again; it is nice feeling like I have a mentor on here!
-
QueenPuck (
talk) 16:28, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
reply
- It is certainly suitable to upload all of the images to Commons. There is no limit to how many images you can upload to Commmons; as long as they could, in theory, be useful for some sort of vaguely educational purpose, they are welcome. I've uploaded the better part of a thousand images to Commons. Endless stuff: SVG diagrams I drew myself, entire bookfulls of illustrations uploaded to illustrate facsimilies of the books on Wikisource, crops of existing Commons images (using CropTool, which is really useful; it means you neededn't download an image to crop it, and you can easily do a Jpeg crop without losing resolution). No-one has ever taken one down for being out-of-scope, and portrait images of historical figures certainly aren't out-of-scope.
- Putting images under CC-BY gives you (and anyone else) permission to upload them all to Commons (though in this case, since they are indeed public domain, you could upload them all even if the site said that they were copyright and absolutely not to be copied anywhere). Any public-domain image may be uploaded to Commons, but any CC-BY image may also be uploaded to Commons. CC-BY-SA (attribution-sharealike) content can also go on Commons. Only CC licenses with an "ND" (no derivatives) or "NC" (non-commercial) condition can't be uploaded. Obviously we make derivatives of images all the time, and our content is also used commercially (for instance, in areas with no internet access, printouts of Wikipedia are sold commercially;
barriers to market entry are not high, which keeps prices down). So Wikipedia needs permission to modify content and use it commercially, even though we are non-commercial. There are other, rarer, compatible licenses; see
Commons:Licensing for details as needed.
- If you are in doubt as to whether a license is allowed on Commons, the simplest route is to try uploading it; for all but the rarest licenses, the Wizard will tell you if the license is incompatible. Also, if you do make a mistake and upload some images that are copyright (as I have, but only a couple times), someone will catch the mistake, investigate, talk to you, and take it down. Honest mistakes that are fixed once caught are not penalized, on Commons or in law.
- If you'd prefer to upload the images under CC-BY, do that; if you include the publication date, someone else may well re-label them as public domain, but it needn't be you. Just clicking the "export" tab and exporting them would be great, if you have time.
Historically, every Wikipedia had its own image repository. Anytime someone wanted to use an image from one language of Wikipedia on another language, they had to re-upload the image. The was a collossal waste of editor time, so Commons was created, to hold images that all the Wikiprojects could use. The vestigial Wikipedia-specific image repositories are now ~only used for uploading fair-use copyright material (for instance,
File:Johnsegrue.jpg, or the images in
Sturm Cigarette Company). There has been discussion of making it impossible to upload images with Commons-compatible licenses to the local Wikipedia repository, but it hasn't been done yet. Also, when you click on an image in Wikipedia, it brings you to a fake local-repository page, and you have to click on another link to get to the Commons page for that image, which is a timewasting absurdity, and I don't know why we haven't abolished it yet.
- Of course you can ask for advice, anytime. I've used plenty of it, I'm only too happy to provide some for a change! That editor's edits do look problematic. The standard thing to do would be to template them with a
user-warning template on their talk page, probably
Template:Uw-paid1, but I think a gentler approach might work better here, like putting them in touch with GLAM (the museum outreach group) to guide their efforts. Would it be okay with you if I looked after it? I'm sure you could manage, and you are as entitled to intervene as I am, but you don't have to and you're right that it's not a beginner-friendly task.
HLHJ (
talk) 18:15, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
reply
- @
HLHJ
- Thank you so much for responding so quickly. I have exported those two images to the Commons (although, somehow, I have duplicated them, is there a way of merging the two into one?) and, in future, I will upload them to the Commons directly under the CC-BY licence.
- I would really appreciate it if you could deal with the editor as, like you say, this feels like a task for a more experienced and knowledgeable editor.
-
QueenPuck (
talk) 18:54, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Luck of when I'm online, I'm afraid.
I've nominated Mary's image for an uncontroversial deletion. Walter's is duplicated too, so I suspect this is just part of how the Commons-export tool works and it will get deleted automatically soon. If it doesn't I'll template it for deletion, too. I'll talk to that editor, thank you for bringing it to my attention.
HLHJ (
talk) 19:07, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
reply
- @
HLHJ
- Great, thank you!
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/Face-smile.svg/20px-Face-smile.svg.png)
-
QueenPuck (
talk) 19:16, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
reply
- It seems both are now de-duplicated! I've posted a message for the editor, too.
HLHJ (
talk) 00:44, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
reply
|