Thanks for your
contributions! You may want check out
the five pillars of Wikipedia as a start. If you need help, try searching at
the help index, check out a
tutorial to editing, and learn
how to edit a page. If you want to start writing, find out
how to create your first article and
how to develop articles, and then use the
Article Wizard to start an article. The
Manual of Style might be of help for style and formatting advice. Remember to
be bold in editing pages, but don't be reckless! |
Try to
learn from others' mistakes so you don't make them yourself, and always
collaborate with others without getting into disputes.
Contribute, contribute, contribute—that's the most important part. To test out your editing skills,
tell us a bit about yourself (but don't post any private information!). If you need any help, try reading
this great guide to Wikipedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to
ask me a question or place {{helpme}} below followed by your query! ☐ |
I've responded to your comments, by the way. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs( talk) 19:20, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shutterbug for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. The Resident Anthropologist ( talk) 19:44, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi, may I ask you to follow up with more detail on your comments here? Thanks, MartinPoulter ( talk) 21:37, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Er, no, no it isn't. Where did you get this very strange idea? Cultural impact most definitely includes science and technology, including the impact on ecosystems. Are you working with a different definition of culture? SETI and the impact of ET on ecosystems is a cultural impact by every definition of the word, and the sources are clear on this. Has it occurred to you yet that SETI itself is a culture-bound enterprise, i.e. looking for radio signals? It sounds like you haven't read many of the sources or put much thought into this. Viriditas ( talk) 01:13, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
A little reminder that you need to get back to dealing with this. You've raised some good points and yes they present the beginning of a reasonable position, but with things like this it is inevitable that the proponents that got this article to a highly dubious FA status in the first place will seek to dismiss counterarguments. 91.125.204.25 ( talk) 23:29, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Hasteur ( talk) 21:17, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Quantumsilverfish
I see that you have tried all the wrong avenues for addressing your concerns about Microsoft Security Essentials. I think it is time to try the right one: Talk to me. You have always escaped that.
If you do not like discussing in the article talk page (fearing similar unfavorable replies from third parties), come to my talk page. Wikipedia grants me wide latitude to keep or discard messages that are posted on my talk page.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (
talk) 07:00, 21 November 2012 (UTC)