Please refrain from using talk pages such as
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on
reliable sources and the project
policies and guidelines; they are
not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See
here for more information. Thank you.
Chris Troutman (
talk)
15:17, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Positiveilluminati! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC) |
Hi is it okay if this article has 5 best resources link? Rather than 3? Positiveilluminati ( talk) 10:03, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi- is the overall theme sounding promotional or just certain sections?
And do you mean to add more reliable sources? There is organic linking of abp live and all Positiveilluminati ( talk) 07:39, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Draft:Ramiz King, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.
You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. Ahmetlii ( talk) 08:31, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Can this be halted I’m working on fixing article and I have requested editors to come help me and demonstrate what is promotional kind of writing and what not - pls give me a chance I’m a die hard fan and this would be a dream to come alive Positiveilluminati ( talk) 09:53, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Positiveilluminati. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 19:06, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
I’m writing about a subject I’m passionate about ? So why is it getting deleted? Positiveilluminati ( talk) 13:00, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zan TV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Brother. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, are any of them reliable I searched online and abp Live was a reliable source and on the wiki search through archives it said all Essel groups publication is reliable? Pls correct me if not I’ll wait a few months before resubmitting Positiveilluminati ( talk) 08:52, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Well the subject is due fir a press circuit around the India today and Indian express after covid restrictions. Will they be fine? What about Deccan herald or first post or statesman? I’m just confused cuz some of the Indian publications are not on the wiki reliability page Positiveilluminati ( talk) 09:00, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
OkY I’ll send you links, via here? One I found it says is a featured one I don’t know if that works https://www.deccanherald.com/brandspot/pr-spot/the-inspirational-journey-of-ramiz-king-contestent-of-mtv-love-school-s4-866310.html Positiveilluminati ( talk) 10:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
I shall wait for more organic ones before submitting again. Thank you Positiveilluminati ( talk) 10:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
I understood as I said, am I allowed to wait till he gains organic media coverage ? Positiveilluminati ( talk) 11:16, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Got it Boss. Positiveilluminati ( talk) 12:34, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
I also wanted to know how come Ramiz fling Krissan Barretto has IWMBUZZ as her resources ? How come some artists have some non reliable sources Positiveilluminati ( talk) 12:39, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
https://www.deccanchronicle.com/in-focus/040820/ramiz-king-is-the-young-star-of-television.html Positiveilluminati ( talk) 15:27, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Ok cool. It is very flowery types but that's how indian media is like Positiveilluminati ( talk) 05:29, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Can reshare like this be considered reliable ? https://www.zee5.com/zee5news/ramiz-king-31-most-interesting-facts Positiveilluminati ( talk) 01:13, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Got it. Thank you JavaHurricane 🥰 Positiveilluminati ( talk) 14:37, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi please check the article sourcing now? I had found out Ramiz team is doing press circuit for his upcoming show so this only few relating sources I found - thank you. - Sneha Positiveilluminati ( talk) 23:08, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Waiting for your approval Positiveilluminati ( talk) 20:04, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
https://www.patrika.com/patrika-plus/afghanistan-has-a-special-identity-with-india-ramiz-king-6897889/ He is this a good source to use over the Indian express indulge? Pls share your expertise Positiveilluminati ( talk) 18:39, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi is this rejection because of sourcing? If so, can I use this than the Indian express indulge one as a main primary source? You can find it’s translation on google being shared by other publications.
https://www.patrika.com/patrika-plus/afghanistan-has-a-special-identity-with-india-ramiz-king-6897889/ Positiveilluminati ( talk) 18:41, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi - this article does meet notability as he is Afghanistan’s first reality tv star? Why would you state that he isn’t? I will just add this to the main forefront, also is the stub an approved one? Positiveilluminati ( talk) 15:48, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique.
The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.
Positiveilluminati (
talk)
08:06, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
I think that applies to him, I’ll ask teahouse too Positiveilluminati ( talk) 08:06, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Please remember to
assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on
User talk:Spinster300. Thank you.
bonadea
contributions
talk
18:37, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Ace of Space 2. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
bonadea
contributions
talk
17:31, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Ace of Space 2, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Google Knowledge Panel is not a reliable source. Nor is Google.
bonadea
contributions
talk
18:10, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Ramiz name is Ramiz King for security reason he wishes to not state his previous name as a follower of his I’m aware of that and he is recognised all over press as Ramiz King Positiveilluminati ( talk) 18:13, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you make
personal attacks on others again, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
Acroterion
(talk)
18:56, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
I’ve checked and he is notable under the guideline of someone creating or establishing a movement or category, why was this declined?
What do you mean redirect to bigg boss? Positiveilluminati ( talk) 13:06, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Positiveilluminati ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I had to forum shop or whatever it is because my discussion was not being discussed and immediately closed in all the sections where I raised the issue. How is this a fair community I feel bullied and forced to keep my mouth shut about an incident which needs light shed on. An editor did indeed misjudge a reliable source with no evidence and I have to pay the price of it? I’m contacting higher authority but this is wrong. I only forum shopped because my discussion are being shut down and it’s evident on the tea house through an comment by a truthful editor which states that why was both discussions closed without further investigation on the matter. I didn’t make a personal attack on the editor I voiced my theory of how they only actively attack a certain demographic more than any other thing on here? I sense unfairness through a phone screen or computer screen too, that’s just me and I said it once but once I was shut down I apolgised and never brought it up again until now. ON BONADEA TALK PAGE HER RESPONSE TO REMOVING MY COMMENTS WAS THAT I AM A SOCK PUPPET WHEN I HAVE HER SCREENSHOT SHE ACKNOWLEDGED MY HONESTY THAT I HAD WRITTEN IN MY TALK PAGE AGES AGO THAT I HAVE TWO ACCOUNTS NOW DUE TO JUDGEMENTS AND SHE NEVER BLOCKEF ME BUT THEY USED THE EXCUSE THAT I WAS A BLOCKED SOCKPUPPET HENCR HER REMOVAL OF THE COMMENT WHICH IS ENTIRELY NOT TRUE BECUASE I WAS NEVER BLOCKED BEFORE UNTIL NOW, I AM FUMING THAT HOW CAN SOMEONE GET AWAY BEING SO UNFAIR ON HERE AND NO ONE DEFENDING OR BEING. A FAIR JUDGE??? I am losing faith in humanity day by day. I WAS NEVER BLOCKED FOR BEING A SOCK PUPPET AND I HAVE HER SCREENSHOT IF ANYONE WANTS TO SEE IT PLEASE ASK BUT YOU HAVE TO INVESTIGATE THIS OR ELSE IM GOING TO MAKE THIS A BIGGER DEAL. Positiveilluminati ( talk) 20:07, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Unblock requests are expected to address your conduct. This isn't about Bonadea, it's about your behavior, which you've completely failed to address. If you abuse unblock requests to attack other editors, your access to this talkpage will be removed. All-caps complaints tend not to be read. Acroterion (talk) 20:23, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Wait a second – I am quite certain I did not call you a sockpuppet or revert any of your edits for that reason. If I did so it was in error (and inadvertent), and I'd appreciate it if you could provide a diff (no screenshots are necessary since all edits are in the page history). I removed some of your posts to my user talk page, but not because of any socking issues. I have also pointed out a couple of times that you should not use both your accounts in parallel, especially not in AfD discussions, but I have been careful to make it clear that I didn't suspect you of trying to deceive other editors. Regards, -- bonadea contributions talk 20:42, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
@Bonadea: I agree, I've not seen that either. I have seen Positiveilluminati making accusations that appear to be aimed at winning a content dispute, which is why they're blocked. Acroterion (talk) 20:58, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
which is what I referred to in my ES? The user is a sockpuppet. They were blocked as a sockpuppet before my second revert.I did write that on my user talk page [1], but it was not about you! It is a different conversation from the one you and I had. The user I was talking about had been indefinitely blocked as a sockpuppet, and I had reverted an inappropriate post they had made to an article talk page. Regards, -- bonadea contributions talk 06:29, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Pooja Misrra, you may be blocked from editing. You have added and repeatedly restored grammar errors, promotional text, and unsourced content. Please stop. bonadea contributions talk 11:30, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pooja Misrra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Boss.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Positiveilluminati. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Lucinda Nicholas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 10:03, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Pratik Sehajpal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
CUPIDICAE💕
15:29, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Part of a set of drafts about Ramiz King; drafts about him and his various projects have been repeatedly created by a number of UPE editors.
Looking at the sources here, only one of them mentions Life According to Ramiz, as a brief aside. The others don't say anything about it, so the fact that notability is nonexistent is obvious. The draft creator has done a very sloppy job, copypasting some references from Draft:Ramiz King and adding them together with some other sources, apparently at random, in the first paragraph to create a bit of a WP:CITEKILL, while the rest of the draft is unsourced. The creator also missed the fact that not only do the sources not support the content in the draft, some of the sources are copies of the same press release.
bonadea contributions talk 15:47, 14 June 2022 (UTC) As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's
mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the
Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at
User:Positiveilluminati, and the template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Positiveilluminati|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia.
bonadea
contributions
talk
15:50, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 12:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's
policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being
blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your
IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you.
bonadea
contributions
talk
09:28, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
This edit summary certainly implies you have a connection with Digangana Suryavanshi. If so, you should NOT be editing the article, but rather using the talk page to request edits.
With that said, if Ms. Suryavanshi doesn't want some images of her available at Wikimedia Commons, she can submit a request for a courtesy deletion following the instructions here. She should be aware that Wikimedia is under no obligation to take the images down, as the creator (the same person who created the new headshot) has released them under a Creative Commons license, making them available to anyone to freely use. BubbaJoe123456 ( talk) 10:33, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.
bonadea
contributions
talk
14:07, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Since your command of written English is not very strong, and since your main objective is apparently to promote Ramiz King, please don't edit articles directly but instead make edit requests as described above. When other editora have to fix every single mainspace edit you make, it turns into a time sink. By using article talk pages to make edit requests, you allow uninvolved editors to add any relevant information in idiomatic and neutrally phrased English. Thank you. -- bonadea contributions talk 21:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Please stop editing while logged out and start using article talk pages to suggest changes. It is not acceptable to force other editors to clean up every single edit you make.
You must also declare your conflict of interest with regard to Ramiz King.
This is in reference to your recent edit to West Ta East. -- bonadea contributions talk 05:43, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Pratik Sehajpal, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PICKLEDICAE🥒 12:32, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Positiveilluminati. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:BaChashem, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 17:01, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Positiveilluminati. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " BaChashem".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:56, 24 December 2022 (UTC)