Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to
Talk:Kanye. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please
redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been
vandalized, please
revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please
the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the
deletion policy for how to proceed. —
Jeff G. (
talk|
contribs) 16:47, 14 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Please do not leave silly warnings on users talk pages as you did to
user:Peter_Napkin_Dance_Party. The discussion page redirecting to Kanye West while the article itself was a disamig page. Please look before you leap. I expect an apology on my own talk page or this will be taken to the administrator's notice board. Thank you.
Peter Napkin Dance Party (
talk) 17:06, 14 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Please take a look at how it use to be.
Talk:Kanye was a redirect to the article on Kanye West, I removed that redirect so that the talk page for
Kanye did not redirect to another article. I am still waiting for my apology. Thank you.
Peter Napkin Dance Party (
talk) 20:31, 15 September 2009 (UTC)reply
(Note, not a personal attack, but rather a overreaction by this wannabe administrator. Person that was responded to hasn't been on Wikipedia for a long time. Regardless, being the charitable chap that I am, I fixed the tone of the comment to make it less personal) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Peter Napkin Dance Party (
talk •
contribs)
::::Now that is an attack, and you need to stop.
Enigmamsg 21:37, 27 October 2009 (UTC)reply
(Note, no it isn't, but rather an explanation for a silly comment.)
Just saying...
Sorry if you thought that was spam, I was just replying to your post on the other talk page.
Abce2|
This isnot a test 00:12, 16 October 2009 (UTC)reply
Dog sex
An ANI was raised against
User:Ckatz, the admin who was reverting the change. This problem came up and there is now an ANI within an ANI!
Thanks! I really don't know anything more about this, I was reading about
Paleo-Eskimos and wound up there. I just saw that the Arm was part of the Bay and redirected it there, I have no idea how it got its name.--
Cúchullaint/
c 17:09, 21 October 2009 (UTC)reply
I see about 1.1% of that....
[3] --
King Öomie 21:41, 27 October 2009 (UTC)reply
I read that this is one award that is intended to be given to yourself, so I thought I could give it to myself irregardless of the suggested requirements. Thanks for checking up on me.
Peter Napkin Dance Party (
talk) 14:57, 28 October 2009 (UTC)reply
Common misconception. The intended reading is, "Once you reach the requirements, you don't need to wait for someone else to notice- you can just add it yourself." And I'll think you'll find that the word "suggested" isn't on that page at all. Also, in the spirit of checking up,
WP:VAND outlines the full extent of edits that can be categorized as 'vandalism'. Attaching that label to anything would be, well, silly- and some people may even see it as a passive-aggressive slap. --
King Öomie 16:45, 28 October 2009 (UTC)reply
Thanks for clearing it up. I wasn't trying to be passive-aggressive by adding it, maybe just a bit boastful of my own talents ;0 I added the vandalism warning because the offending editor did more than just removed the misperceived award.
Peter Napkin Dance Party (
talk) 19:19, 28 October 2009 (UTC)reply
You're not helping your cause here.
Enigmamsg 21:15, 28 October 2009 (UTC)reply