This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks I appreciate you reverting vandalism to my talk, but I personally prefer to keep it. Thanks again, though. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
I don't mean to deface your page but wanted to leave a message: [removed per BLP]. It [removed per BLP]. News of the World firewall doesn't allow me to give the link but I assure you the intent was not vandalism. Apols if I caused problems on the page but the McAlpine page is not very accurate anyway and I would recommend taking it down, since she's linking to it from Facebook at the moment for political purposes (she's a candidadate in the next election). Please delete this by all means. Best wishes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.153.17 ( talk • contribs) 23:15, 30 October 2010
(UTC)
Hi Peter, I made a contribution about Lima Metro, the objective was to catch up with the actual situation of the system, and I´ve been banned. I didnt past the correspondant links where the information comes, thats the problem?
Thanks for your time.jpcea00 Jpcea00 ( talk) 17:51, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
What were the reasons for your "keep" decision? Skookum1 ( talk) 03:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Can u help me deal with an amateur editor that keeps changing sourced content on this article? I made a post at the editor's talk page concerning the edits, but it ignored it and continued with the same edit (I would like to avoid reverting edits made to that article three times, so I would appreciate some help). Dan56 ( talk) 05:47, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Slightly aghast reading the warning at the top, but nevertheless: Thanks for reverting Robert Delaunay and (many) other pages. Keep up the good work. Superp ( talk) 22:06, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
I just thought you might like to know how the article from this AfD you participated in is doing. It has been cleaned up and is nearing completion. And it looks good.
By the way, the guy ( User:A Radish for Boris) who nominated it for deletion was discovered to be a sock puppet, and has been indefinitely blocked. So I guess the AfD was invalid to begin with.
Thank you for your support. The Transhumanist 05:10, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Someone e-mailed me today with allegations that you're a sock of Erik9 / John254. I don't really have the time or patience to investigate this, so I figured the simplest solution should be employed here (i.e., asking you directly). So, is this true? Were you previously Erik9/John254? If so, can you request that your account be blocked, please? Thank you. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 02:59, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for removing the Protected edit user right proposal from Cent. For your general information, when removing old discussions they are placed in Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Archive as a record of the discussion. Sometimes discussions are listed which are not appropriate, and they may be removed without archiving, though a note that the listing was inappropriate should be made in the edit summary as a record. I have placed the discussion in the archive as, even though it was a proposal, which generally is not acceptable, the edit summary didn't make clear that the listing might fail WP:CENTNOT. More information is available at WP:CENT.
By the way, your talkpage message is a little heavy and unpleasant. Do you think someone who intends to vandalise your page would be deterred by that message? And what impression of the site do you feel is being given out? It's worth noting that the WP:Don't be a dick essay was felt inappropriate for Wikipedia. Wikipedia:Don't be inconsiderate is an alternative essay, and you might consider if you are being inconsiderate with your message. SilkTork * YES! 14:20, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
I have reported User:174.27.246.236 to the User:174.27.246.236 due to his/her repeated inserting of unsupported claims of Satanists at the Starwood Festival. I suspect that this anonymous user is actually the return of blocked User:RasputinJSvengali, and is also using the IP User:67.177.27.74. You criticized his/her editing on the article Kelly Ripa. Rosencomet ( talk) 18:38, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your support at my RfA last week. I'll do everything I can to live up to your expectations and if you ever need help from a janitor please feel free to drop me a line! Panyd The muffin is not subtle 20:49, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |