This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot ( error?) 09:23, 14 April 2013 (UTC)On 18 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Chief Justice of Hungary, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the position of Chief Justice of Hungary was held mostly by ecclesiastical dignitaries until the 1507 reform? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chief Justice of Hungary. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 00:04, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello
Where in the reference does it state that he committed suicide? - Michael David ( talk) 03:36, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello! Neked miért nincs a wikis adatlapodon beállítva e-mail, ahol kommunikálni lehetne veled? Köszi a választ! -- Balkony ( talk) 13:02, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Azóta sem történt változás, elvileg beállítottad, gyakorlatilag semmiféle -email gomb nem látszik a lapodon-- Balkony ( talk) 13:49, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you were engaged in several edit wars. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution.
When an addition of content is contested, don't insist on inserting it.in lack of consensus, as you did here: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Pavel_Jozef_%C5%A0af%C3%A1rik&action=history -- Omen1229 ( talk) 13:59, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I see that you are a wikipedian for a long time and I imagine that you know how the community works. I am very confused by some of your latest edits, I am wondering did you simply made a mistake or you are picking which SOCK edits to keep and which to revert?
Please explain the logic in your last couple of edits, where you keep User:Stubes99 edits:
While here you remove Iasi`s SOCK edits:
You do understand that keeping any SOCK edits is against wikipedia rules [7]? You can`t just choose which to keep and which not. If you are reverting one SOCK`s edits, revert ALL of them. Adrian ( talk) 20:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
-- Norden1990 ( talk) 21:06, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Avout this [13] , it is still SOCK data, you just moved it a little. Adrian ( talk) 21:29, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
I did not choose among the socks' reliability, this choice was already happened when Stubes' edits were deleted and Iaasi's were not. And If you can see, the reverted paragraphs were checked and rewritten by myself. For the Gyulafehérvár case: yes, Iaaasi's method was incorrect, because the category of Burials at Gyulafehérvár Cathedral already had been existed. Newnou or Iaaasi should have been request to renaming this category at the relevant WP page. -- Norden1990 ( talk) 21:35, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
[16] This was also a sock edit. This is clearly a correction of an error, but, according to your logic, the wrong version is should be keep until doomsday, because a sockpuppet corrected this error once a time... -- Norden1990 ( talk) 21:55, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ban (title), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Avars ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:08, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Eastern Europe. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the " Final decision" section of the decision page.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
This warning relates to the ongoing ANI thread, where I have explained the kind of misconduct you must desist from. Sandstein 09:25, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ilona Kudász is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilona Kudász until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hi Norden1990, you were mentioned on ANI by user Hortobagy. KœrteFa {ταλκ} 23:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=554420174#The_harmful_speech_of_Norden1990 oh it's not nice what you do Norden1990.. Hortobagy ( talk) 15:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
I think the last version proposed by our Romanian co-editor could be accepted, provided that the reference to the Maros river follows the same pattern. What do you think of this? Borsoka ( talk) 13:01, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, you added a category to the 2013 Stockholm riots article indicating that the riots would be ethnic in nature. That's something that'd need to be pretty well sourced. I've, for now, removed the category. Please add sources and/or discuss on the talk page if you disagree. / Julle ( talk) 09:33, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
FYA Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Voivode of Transylvania/archive1. Maybe :) Borsoka ( talk) 11:25, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi Norden, I think I "belenyultam a lecsoba". I simply do not understand the superior/subordinate relationships between the captaincies. A dunantuli resz meg ertheto az altalad adott Palffy anyag altal, de Upper Hungary az egyszeruen erthetetlen. Palffytol meg egesz jo angol anyagot is talaltam [18] de meg igy is "kinai" (nekem)... Fakirbakir ( talk) 21:07, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Fakirbakir ( talk) 21:26, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello! I don't think you see the real point of the argument. You may not agree with me, but i think the real point of the argument is, that, just like IRL, they are trying to separate MVH from székelyföld. Here perhaps they don't do it on purpose and only follow the IRL tendencies but the result is the same. In 1990 they could have beaten the Hungarians in many other places but they went for the cultural center of the solid ethnic enclave of Székelyföld. Here they are desperately trying to avoid the direct associaton of MVH with székelyföld. -- Rob.HUN ( talk) 23:19, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, please be aware of the 3RR. Greetings Adrian ( talk) 13:09, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Adrian ( talk) 13:43, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Bbb23 (
talk)
15:05, 14 July 2013 (UTC)Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rátót (genus) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 16:21, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello Norden1990, I'm contacting you because we need some Hungarian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on hu.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Hungarian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) ( talk) 01:07, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
On 21 July 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Julius I Kán, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Julius I Kán, a faithful supporter of Andrew II of Hungary, was imprisoned by the new king Béla IV of Hungary in 1235? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Julius I Kán. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! - Darouet ( talk) 20:30, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
The Epic Barnstar | ||
For your hard work on creating quality articles on voivodes, bans and other dignitaries with strange titles of the Kingdom of Hungary. Szép munka, gratulálok! Borsoka ( talk) 13:35, 30 July 2013 (UTC) |
Szia! Are you sure that he was a cardinal? As far as I remember the first Hungarian prelate who was appointed cardinal István Báncsa in the second half of the 13th century. Borsoka ( talk) 11:36, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kató Hámán may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 21:32, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
I note on a DYK nom of yours that your QPQ is of Rufus the Hawk. However, you haven't made any comment on the nom page yet. Could you please take a look? Cheers, violet/riga [talk] 22:04, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:AntallJozsef.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth ( talk) 15:06, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
On 30 August 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Michael of Hungary, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that almost all kings of Hungary after 1046 descended from Michael, the second son of Grand Prince Taksony? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Michael of Hungary. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 12:04, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
The drafting arbitrators have requested that you be formally added as a party to the Manning naming dispute case. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute/Evidence. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.
For the Arbitration Committee,
Seddon talk 18:35, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 17:57, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ákos Farkas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nazi occupation of Hungary ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
The article you created on Kata Tisza is a good start, but it badly needs more inline citations to establish notability, and some other efforts.-- DThomsen8 ( talk) 00:14, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bertalan Andrásfalvy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 15:44, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
On 1 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bernadett Szél, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Hungarian secretary of state Zoltán Illés said to fellow member of parliament Bernadett Szél, "just because you're pretty doesn't also mean you're smart"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bernadett Szél. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 08:04, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:41, 4 October 2013 (UTC)