Except the cat is overlaying the text and I can't read it. :'( Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 00:50, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, Neuro! Same to you. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:56, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
<-- Thanks for the greetings Neuro ... Hope you have a wonderful year as well ... Ched ( talk) 13:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
You were wrong! -- Closedmouth ( talk) 09:04, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Neurolysis! Rather than altering your !vote, could you do a striketrough instead. That will show more continuity to you comments. Rgrds. -- Tombstone ( talk) 11:12, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Dear Neurolysis,
Wishing you a happy new year, and very best wishes for 2009. Whether we were friends or not in the past year, I hope 2009 will be better for us both.
Kind regards,
Majorly talk 21:17, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm interested in your thoughts on the Wikipedia_talk:Rfa#I hope you all like red thread. (Watchlisting for a few days.) - Dan Dank55 ( send/receive) 04:56, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, this got archived :P This should clear up your WikiCup concern. Garden. 19:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar | ||
For introducing me to Special:PrefixIndex/Criticism_of on a recent AF D thank you SO much. travb ( talk) 01:52, 3 January 2009 (UTC) |
ANI is a noticeboard for incidents that require administrative action, the thread you are "helping others draw conclusions on" is a joke, and result of a banned user trolling and just trying to be disruptive. His complaint was over me (and 5 or 6 other editors) undoing the material he had been trying to add for days which he was citing with blogs and youtube videos. I deleted his comments from my talk page because he was trolling, this user has a pattern and that is what he always does. What conclusion are you helping others draw exactly? Have you noticed you are the only person commenting on my actions on that thread in a negative manner? I did absolutely nothing that requires administrative action. Again, ANI is strictly for incidents that require administrative action, and should not be cluttered up with irrelevant comments by users with an axe to grind. I am allowed to remove whatever the hell I want from my talk page as long as it isn't a block template while I'm blocked, etc. There is nothing to discuss regarding my removing comments from my talk page. Doing so does not violate any policy or guideline, and therefore the matter requires no administrative action. Remember ANI='s Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Landon1980 ( talk) 21:05, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 45 | 24 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 46 | 1 December 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
ArbCom elections: Elections open | Wikipedia in the news |
WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System | Features and admins |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 1 | 3 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
... for your new years message :-).
~Beano~ (talk) (contribs) 09:02, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for pointing me to the images page but I still can't get my head round the basics, like where the uploaded images actually ARE right now and so on. I may be being dense, or maybe I've just spent too many hours editing in the last three days :) Astral highway ( talk) 17:37, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Youn know, instead of just slapping on a useless tag, maybe you should consider mentioning on the talk page why you believe the images are inappropriate.
Homerpalooza.png - illustrates a key plot point and key moment of the episode, Homer getting shot with a cannon. Both of these are mentioned in the plot section.
Simpsons Sonic Youth.jpg - Probably the most expendable of the four, but it shows the designs of four guest stars, again discussed in the article.
Rover Hendrix.png - The Rover Hendrix joke - again discussed in the article - has been mentioned by the shows producers and by several critics as one of the worst jokes in the history of the show. Appropriately, some may wonder what it looks like, so there is an image.
Simpsons No Doubt.png - The members of No Doubt were animated into the episode by one of the animators. This is very much an "easter egg" and not easy to see, so the image does help aid in the commentary.
-- Scorpion 0422 23:40, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Might I ask that you consider not closing AFDs like this so early? There was nothing wrong with the closure and I won't reopen it, but there's a standard five-day listing period that should only be cut off in the most obvious of cases. Stifle ( talk) 10:01, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
I was posting there simply because the post was on AN/I. Users who are not administrators can archive threads or close threads on AN/I when it's clear there is nothing more going on. When a very long thread is on AN/I, and it is no longer serving it's purpose, archiving can make the board easier to navigate. -- KP Botany ( talk) 22:51, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thanks for supporting the reduction of my block, happy new year.
I have a question. Am I supposed to archive my discussion page?
Also what is "flagged revisions?"
Mdandrea (
talk) 05:31, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to
attack other editors, as you did on
User_talk:Spotfixer. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I've reverted your edits to the talk page.
Feel free to revise your edits, to communicate your point without inappropriate language. Poor behavior on the part of one editor does not justify poor behavior on the part of another. Thesoxlost ( talk) 16:46, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
lol, what an awful notice. Didn't mean to imply that you were a newbie. Just wanted to point out that poor behavior on the part of other editors doesn't justify a nasty edit on your part. Let's not let this escalate any more. Thanks, -- Thesoxlost ( talk) 16:50, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
[1] I now know what ipconfig means. Can you take a look at this question? Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:02, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
I tend to find that with very new articles, there is always an author determined to keep the article, who will de-PROD it, so you always end up at AfD anyway. As a result, I rarely PROD new articles. If it aint a speedy, it is going to need an AfD anyway (IMHO) Mayalld ( talk) 22:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Neuro, may I ask for your help? The AN/I discussion concerning "bias" on Andrew Vachss has been archived without a resolution. [2] I wasn't the one who filed the incident report, but I would like very much to have a decision. My reason is that I want to remove the "bias" banner ("This article or section may represent a biased viewpoint inconsistent with Wikipedia's neutral policy...") The banner says the dispute should be resolved before it can be removed. It was placed on Andrew Vachss when Plh25.0/ 65.110.137.227 opened the AN/I report. Could you review and resolve the situation? Thanks very much for your help, and have a wonderful New Year! Golemarch ( talk) 21:21, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your assistance. Personally, I do not consider the matter resolved. In fact, I don't even consider it to have been discussed. And I think Golemarch's actions show just how interested or uninterested he is in actually discussing it. Andrew Vachss is a popular writer who holds some very controversial opinions and then advocates legislation and other actions based on those opinions. I'm amazed anyone disputes this. On the other hand, I need to familiarize myself with wikipedia a bit more. And, by the way, sorry for the confusion. I thought you, "Neuro," asked if I were you. I am, for the record, not you. Since I was clearly being badgered by someone engaging in wikilawyering and didn't understand the question, I answered truthfully. I did, for the record, make the edits alleged to have been made by me, but was not aware I was violating any policies (and still am not convinced I violated any policies, in fact, it appears to me that Golemarch has violated the spirit if not the wording of several policies and is much too emotionally involved with the subject of Andrew Vachss to be impartial, but will research the matter further before proceeding. All the best and thanks again. Plh25.0 ( talk) 18:29, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
I stopped by now that I've figured out how to do this.
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
Thank you for being the impetus that brought me back to Wikipedia. Your patience and clear-headed help made participation possible again. Kallimina ( talk) 23:21, 7 January 2009 (UTC) |
Hi. I've nominated your /No subpage for MFD as part of this MFD because it's identical. // roux 11:53, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
When will you start editing again? Can I help in any way?-- Accdude92 (Merry Christmas!) 16:26, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
What is wrong?-- Accdude92 (Merry Christmas!) 17:54, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Oh no! I hope you get better because Wikipedia cant afford to lose a fine editor like you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Accdude92 ( talk • contribs) 18:01, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
OK one last thing,if you need to talk anything over, please contact me as I am here for you!-- Accdude92 (Happy January!) 18:05, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Thank you for the Christmas and New Year's well wishes. My apologies for the late reply. Something off-Wikipedia came up and I've been away for the past few weeks. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 03:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
How was your ct scan?-- Accdude92 (Happy January!) 13:55, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
I bet your really busy...-- Accdude92 (Happy January!) 17:49, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm glad you caught me; I was just logging off. I gave the matter a lot of thought over the last couple of years. There's been such an upswing in nonsense and organized vandalism that I couldn't just sit back and blow the whistle. Thanks for the nice words. Good to be back and able to help. -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 21:31, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
How do I create archives?-- Accdude92 (Happy January!) 15:30, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 2 | 10 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC) §hepBot ( Disable) 18:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
The reason for removing the DICK banner is because m:DICK is such a horrible "policy" that it should be deleted outright, not promoted anywhere. If you'll notice, it's already been chased clear off Wikipedia, and so it now resides on Meta, where it's slightly more immune from deletion. The fundamental problem with "Don't be a dick", and even its original creator admits to this now, is that it is often used in an argument as an excuse for calling someone else a name. Instead of saying "Please be nice", which is a reasonable non-inflammatory thing to say, people will say "Don't be a dick", which is pretty much just an insult hiding under the guise of a wikilink to a pseudo-policy page. This page expounds more on the issue.
Also, having an ad bar rapidly saying "Don't be a XXXXX" where XXXXX is a dozen different euphemisms for penis is just stupid, and causes terrible confusion with random readers uninformed on Wikipedia culture stumbling across any of the hundreds of places where the template is used. The templates advertising WikiProjects at least serve a purpose, this one doesn't. Hence the removal. -- Cyde Weys 01:02, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Why have you removed my valid comment? Is it a habit of yours to remove all comments which your meter finds unhelpful? Миша 13 07:39, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Neurolysis, cheers, but I don't think I edit enough at the moment to ask for them back. If I wanted to come back as an admin, I'd probably ask Tim Starling to reset my password on my old account and discontinue using the new account. But I appreciate your kind vote of confidence! :-) Tbsdy lives (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 09:16, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. You were a participant in the discussion for this article, which I closed as delete. I restored and relisted the article at AfD yesterday. I notified most participants, but somehow missed you and a couple of others. Please accept my apologies. The discussion is here. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 04:24, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DC, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:DC and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:DC during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 06:49, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
For your interest Wikipedia:Meetup/Birmingham_3. Majorly talk 19:22, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you Neuro for voting in my successfully closed RfA! I'm glad that you trust me. Ping me if you need anything! Best regards, -- Kanonkas : Talk 19:39, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
I hope you can keep a look at that page, and see if as I leave, these people who have provided so much hate on Wikipedia come in to throw stones. [3] Icsunonove ( talk) 20:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
You warned, him but he keeps going and on and on and on... Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#user:Icsunonove II and fresh from him: [4]... -- noclador ( talk) 22:08, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
before i punch out of this place, please do explain to me how that was a personal attack above? and also why it is ok for noclador to come on here and say such stuff, but you get on me only. I'm sorry that your page became a thread above, apologies for that. Icsunonove ( talk) 22:46, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 3 | 17 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 23:58, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
(edit conflict) The article is currently at User:PartyDude!/Sandbox -- PartyDude! ( talk) 21:36, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Is there any way I can get help with writing this article (finding references at the least) -- PartyDude! ( talk) 01:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Neuro Chris, thanks very much for your ongoing contribution to the project. With regard to non-admin closures please familiarize yourself with
Wikipedia:Non-admin closure. While that page is an essay, it is intended as a supplement to
Wikipedia:Deletion process. Non-admin closure should only be done in cases where there is an unambiguous Keep or Redirect or Merge. In the above deletion discussion, this was not the case as the discussion was closed before its full listing period.
Pocopocopocopoco (
talk) 04:17, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
In getting certain groups of images under 'free' license, auto tagged, the following should be inserted into PD/CC etc license tags before the section at the end.
<includeonly>{{CommonsEncouraged|works created by the [[United States Congress]]|commons={{{commons|}}}}}</includeonly>
<includeonly>{{CommonsEncouraged|works created in [[Estonia]] for which copyright has expired|commons={{{commons|}}}}}</includeonly>
<includeonly>{{CommonsEncouraged|works created in [[Finland]] that are copyright exempt|commons={{{commons|}}}}}</includeonly>
<includeonly>{{CommonsEncouraged|from the named archive or collection|commons={{{commons|}}}}}</includeonly> <nowiki> <nowiki> <includeonly>{{CommonsEncouraged|works under a 'free' licence|commons={{{commons|}}}}}</includeonly>
<includeonly>{{CommonsEncouraged|the named work in which copyright has expired|commons={{{commons|}}}}}</includeonly>
Obviously the names in the messages should be changed appropriately for the relevant tag. Which line to add for which tag should be common sense, but ask if unsure.. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 01:35, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
I just saw an OR notice and a speedy on that article. I didn't see anything else, but I may have missed it. I'll restore it. -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 02:57, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey! Given Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Phone_Call_to_Putin, could you please re-open Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Phone_Call_to_Putin_(2nd_nomination)? I think there are enough editors calling for this at DRV that it would save everyone lots of time. Sometimes, an early close like this seems spot on where consensus will go and very often is, but when it happens not to be, the most helpful thing to do is to relist. Cheers, Gwen Gale ( talk) 10:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi there! Just wondering if you were ok with replacing File:Qxz-ad162.gif with a version that points to WP:ERRORS, which is where we want them to go. I know that this is stated prominently on main page talk, but most people, unfortunately, don't read more than the first sentence before skipping it and complaining on the wrong page. :P Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :D 14:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your participation in
my recent RfA, which failed with 90/38/3; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral.
Special thanks go out to Moreschi, Dougweller and Frank for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board. Thanks again for your participation. I am currently concentrating my efforts on the Wikification WikiProject. It's fun! Please visit the project and wikify a few articles to help clear the backlog. If you can recruit some more participants, then even better. Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Itsmejudith ( talk), 22:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC) |
Denbot ( talk) 22:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Maddie! has given you a
cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
Maddie talk 02:40, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the kind words & holiday-related wishes, and a special thanks for your efforts in re. the FUR for elements of "my" article. Please feel free to contact me personally via any medium listed on my userpage should any niche of my background be useful to you in improving the content or community of Wikipedia, inter alia.
— Adrian~enwiki ( talk) 08:55, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
In getting certain groups of images under 'free' license, auto tagged, the following should be inserted into PD/CC etc license tags before the section at the end.
<includeonly>{{CommonsEncouraged|works created by the [[United States Congress]]|commons={{{commons|}}}}}</includeonly>
<includeonly>{{CommonsEncouraged|works created in [[Estonia]] for which copyright has expired|commons={{{commons|}}}}}</includeonly>
<includeonly>{{CommonsEncouraged|works created in [[Finland]] that are copyright exempt|commons={{{commons|}}}}}</includeonly>
<includeonly>{{CommonsEncouraged|from the named archive or collection|commons={{{commons|}}}}}</includeonly> <nowiki> <nowiki> <includeonly>{{CommonsEncouraged|works under a 'free' licence|commons={{{commons|}}}}}</includeonly>
<includeonly>{{CommonsEncouraged|the named work in which copyright has expired|commons={{{commons|}}}}}</includeonly>
Obviously the names in the messages should be changed appropriately for the relevant tag. Which line to add for which tag should be common sense, but ask if unsure..
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:35, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
(the above post is taken from from
the archive)
I am not sure how Neurolysis fits into this but as the above post was made January 20, 2009 saying the "following should be inserted into PD/CC etc license tags before the section at the end" I will respond to it. I have seen no public discussion and see no consensuses for the changes made on January 20 to numerous templates by adding the {{ CommonsEncouraged}} tag. We now have incorrectly licensed images not only being tagged with "Images from works of this type are candidates to be copied to the Wikimedia Commons using the Transwiki process" but also being added to Category:Copy to Wikimedia Commons. Please consider reverting all of these changes until there has been a community discussion on this change. As this seems to have been been done by Denelson83 and Sfan00 IMG I have posted messages on their pages as well. Thank you. Soundvisions1 ( talk) 16:17, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
You can also use |commons= This image is not compatible with Commons on any images which are in dispute.
Which specfic examples are of concern? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:15, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
NOTE: I did find User talk:Denelson83#Templates for commons move 'auto-tag' poste don Janury 20, 2009, that I had missed. However the only comment is from today, January 22, made by user:multichill, who points out "Unfortunately this will overflow Category:Copy to Wikimedia Commons. Not all of these images can be copied to Commons right away, the images first need to be checked for proper author and source." Basically echoing my thoughts. Soundvisions1 ( talk) 16:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
RFAs should just be closed per NOTNOW/SNOW if the candidate has very very little experience (and edit count), for example: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Neckername. However in Hereford's case that does clearly not apply. Please have a look at this and this and please be more careful in the future. Also, please remember that the main point of NOTNOW is to help users who are not aware of the withdraw process. Given the candidate's experience on Wikipedia he should be allowed to decide himself whether his RfA should be withdrwan. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:01, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
I didn't follow, neuro; all the contributions to that page you didn't like were by User:Frogger3140, are you saying that's the same person as Hereford? (Watchlisting) - Dan Dank55 ( send/receive) 00:23, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your apology, although I dispute your claim that your comments were aimed at what I said "What I expect is for people to not be hateful and malicious, and to show some common decency by not being completely and utterly insolant" seems to be aimed at the person. I intended the comment in a light hearted way and feel that your response was far more insulting than the way I phrased my oppose. I have apologised on Peter's talkpage and he has been very understanding, no doubt one of the reasons he is so popular. I accept that the way I phrased my oppose was ill considered, but I think a well considered response would have illustrated the point a lot better than two "angry" responses. Anyhow, no hard feelings King of the North East 01:14, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for letting me know about the "multiple users" rule. I am still learning Wikipedia rules. I did reply on my talk page, and attempted to notify you using Neurolysis: [message]. LegitScript ( talk) 23:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey Neuro, how you doing my friend? I've seen your comments around a little, and just wanted to drop back in to say hi. How's that new GPU you got over the holidays working out for ya? Well, I didn't really have much to say, just wanted to stop by and say hi. Hi!, ;) ... Ched ( talk) 01:45, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey Neuro, I am curious as to why editing wikipedia is considered vandalism? I did not remove entire sections on the exercise physiology page like you (are you also littlehow?) did. I suggested removing the poorly written first paragraph and replacing it with the older (although more general) opening. Explain why this is vandalism? Wouldn't vandalism be silencing other voices who wish to contribute to wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Realep1 ( talk • contribs) 16:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 4 | 24 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by 03:31, 25 January 2009 (UTC) at §hepBot ( Disable)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The deletion procedure mandates a minimum discussion period of five days. How can the decision after only two, 2-1/2 days have been legitimate? Hurmata ( talk) 02:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Is there a way for me to add new stats on there?-- Accdude92 (Happy January!) 16:22, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Like you know how it says I am online? Can I add something like At school or something? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Accdude92 ( talk • contribs) 16:26, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
And where do I go to do that?-- Accdude92 (Happy January!) 16:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
I really need to learn programming... Its just I cant find were to start. I don't want to read this long article or anything...-- Accdude92 (Happy January!) 16:40, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
That what I basically just stated. What I am asking is where to learn how to start up?-- Accdude92 (Happy January!) 16:49, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Isn't Wikipedia a place were I would be using it regularly? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Accdude92 ( talk • contribs) 16:57, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Guess what? Im out of school due to ice!!! Wootness! Do you have a job?-- Accdude92 (Happy January!) 17:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
I am on irc. -- Accdude92 (Happy January!) 17:45, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
This whole time I assumed you were an adult, not near my age (16) LOL! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Accdude92 ( talk • contribs) 17:11, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Neuro,
This may be an odd question, but do you know of any way to find a list of articles that link to a particular seed article? -- Thesoxlost ( talk) 18:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Neuro,
I am new to handling vandalism. The problem is on the exercise physiology article. An individual is changing the page and removing comment from the current version of the talk page. Just a few minutes ago my comments explaining why I removed this individuals changes was deleted. I had cut a section that this individual inserted as a simple cut and paste. On returning to it after a break I googled it and found it is from another website and could potentially be violating copyright. This page has a long history of problems. It seems most people give up. The procedures of handling vandalism are unfamiliar to me. I would appreciate help--or at least being directed to someone that can aid. -- LittleHow ( talk) 19:58, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
I have reverted your non-admin close at AfD. Given that most arguments are based on inherited notability, which isn't even established in most of the other related articles, I'm asking you let it run it's proper course. I don't find such arguments at all relevant,a nd the sources now provided continue to all exist as WP:CRYSTAL violating solicitation sources. Allow an admin to review and decide at the end, per policy. Thank you. ThuranX ( talk) 21:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Keepscases made a good point in this thread: "You'll also notice that my talk page is filled with messages from established users who appreciate my questions". Among people who are still left on Wikipedia, you made one of the 4 supporting comments on Keepscases' talk page. Is that still your opinion after reading the other messages on Keep's talk page and in the link above, and if so, would you like to argue this position in the current conversation? (Watchlisting) - Dan Dank55 ( send/receive) 22:42, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Just wanted to drop by and say "good day ol chap" that is if that is what you Englanders say.-- Accdude92 (Happy January!) 13:54, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
You busy?-- Accdude92 (Happy January!) 15:08, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Why is your user page protected? -- Accdude92 (Happy January!) 16:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
I assume that the problem isn't the gallery page itself (I don't need that, and have blanked it), but rather the images that the gallery page linked to. Regarding those, I have (a) no idea why there would be watermarks (presumably either something that the Snagit screen capture software automatically inserted, when I took the initial screenshots (why?), or that O'Reilly Media staff added when they prepared the screenshots for the book; and (b) no idea which images do and don't have watermarks.
Could you help me with (b)? If, for example, the problem is with greyscale images, that's a lot easier to deal with than if the problem is color images.
Thanks! -- John Broughton (♫♫) 22:24, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Please see this. That page was apart of a great deal of moves that happened without discussion that broke WP:SPI.— Dæ dαlus Contribs 22:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
You please answer my questions above? -- Accdude92 (Happy January!) 17:50, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I have undone your closure of this AfD because it did not run for the five days mandated by the deletion policy. I note with some concern that this is the second time I have noticed an incorrect non-admin closure by you, and a section above raises concerns about yet another such closure. Please be considerably more careful when closing AfDs in the future. Thanks, Sandstein 22:52, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Im online your irc channel.-- Accdude92 (Happy January!) 23:43, 31 January 2009 (UTC)