![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Welcome to Wikipedia, Nedim Ardoğa! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{ helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{ helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Marek.69 talk 12:56, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi Nedim, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 talk 12:33, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on İçel sanat kulübü requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
WWGB (
talk) 10:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
The article Power ratio vs decibel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
Proposed Deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Favonian (
talk) 12:33, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Power ratio vs decibel, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power ratio vs decibel. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Favonian ( talk) 06:09, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi Nedim Ardoğa, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek. 69 talk 14:51, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I've noticed your recent edits which are mostly irrelevant and not an improvement. The Turkish language is only associated with modern Turkey. Adding it to the articles of ancient empires or peoples who were neither associated with modern Turkey, modern Turkish, or at least the Oghuz branch of the Turkic languages is POV and irrelevant. It will get removed. It's like adding the Indian names of certain American, English, German or French empires/peoples in the respective articles, because all of these languages are related. Regards. Tajik ( talk) 16:05, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
If you find a book, magazine, newspaper article, etc that you want to use as a reference, just type one of the following after the information in the article which the reference is about:
<ref>''Title of article'',author of article, (Title of newspaper/magazine, date of article, page(s), column(s))</ref>
<ref>''Title of book'', author of book, (publisher, date of publication, page(s))</ref>
<ref>[http://web-page-address ''Title of webpage''], author of page, date of page's creation, website name</ref>
For example:
<ref>''An article in a well-known newspaper'', John E. Beegood, (The New York Times, 1 August 1987, page 6 col 2)</ref>
<ref>''How do I create references?'', Met-al Icca, (Heinemann Publishing, 1964, pp. 16-17)</ref>
<ref>[http://www.a-reputable-website.org/a_useful_page.html ''How to Create Useful References''], PhantomSteve, 12 March 1999, a-reputable-website.org</ref>
Then at the bottom of the page, make sure you have the following two lines:
==References==
<references/>
-or- {{reflist}}
This would generate (for the above examples):
References
With basic references like this in place, more experienced editors can tidy them up! The hard bit can be finding references!
Please make sure you read the guideline Reliable Sources which details the kind of sources Wikipedia prefers to use.
If you have any questions, just ask me! Regards, -- PhantomSteve ( Contact Me, My Contribs) 12:53, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey there. I've had a look at List of mayors of Mersin, and I agree with you and therefore have removed those tags. Incidently, if tags like those appear on an article you're working on in the future, please don't read them as criticism. They're simply to alert other Wikipedia users what type of work is needed on it.
I made a couple of minor changes to the article, including removing one of the references - generally you don't use other wikipedia articles as references, and also I added a specific references heading. I also tagged it on the Turkish wikiproject so that other editors can contribute - I wouldn't normally have graded another wikiproject's article but as it's a list, generally it'll be in the list class.
Regards, Miyagawa ( talk) 18:51, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Kürşat maddesinin ingilizcesini yapmışsın.burdada katkı sağlamak lazım sanırım.türkçesinde yazacaktım sana yasaklıydın.-- Kamuran otukenli ( talk) 14:27, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
You seem to have forgotten to add a source and licence tag WP:TAGS to File:Carrier modulated by 1 V VF.jpg that you uploaded recently. Hope you can fix that soon. ww2censor ( talk) 16:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
ww2censor ( talk) 19:09, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Thedarxide ( talk) 16:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Nedim Ardoğa, please see my comments [1]. Thanks, Barefact ( talk) 18:09, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I've just tweaked the text of Bays of Turkey. I made it quite a bit shorter, but I don't think I dropped any information.
Can I perhaps interest you in the question I posted right above yours at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Turkey? -- Hoary ( talk) 11:28, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your generous supply of information from the interview. I've responded here; could you please take a look? Thank you -- Hoary ( talk) 05:09, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Nedim,
I've reverted your additions of Turkish elections to year articles such as 1946 and 1950. The edits create a slippery slope; if we add elections for one country to a year article, we must had elections for all countries, and that would make the articles unmanageably large. Graham 87 14:58, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Nedim, I'd be happy to explain them.
1. The general practice on Wikipedia is to refer to an entity by only one name, and to refer to it in sub-articles by that one name also. Thus, while the empire in question was also known as Turkey or the Turkish Empire, our article for it is at Ottoman Empire, and all articles involving the topic should only use the term Ottoman or Ottoman Empire, for consistency and simplicity. (To give another example: there was a long debate about renaming our article on the Swiss capital Berne to Bern. When that finally happened, a lot (though for some reason not all) of our articles on the subject were moved from using Berne to Bern.)
2. I moved the article on the treaty because we have Treaty of Constantinople (1479), Treaty of Constantinople (1700) and Treaty of Constantinople (1832). It would be odd to have just one at Treaty of Istanbul (and by the way, our article on Istanbul uses I and not İ). If you'd like to discuss moving all four articles to Treaty of Istanbul, I suggest using WP:RM, but until then, I think it's preferable to be consistent in our naming conventions. - Biruitorul Talk 16:37, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |