Welcome...
Hello, Natural Cut, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
七星 (
talk) 04:34, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Greetings...
Hello, Natural Cut, and welcome to Wikipedia!
Thanks for your copyedits to Plunketts Creek Bridge No. 3. I have added a map showing the New Purchase and a brief mention of it to the Treaty of Fort Stanwix article too. Welcome and keep up the good work, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 04:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to TPK. Thank you. -- Ericdn ( talk) 19:15, 11 February 2009 (UTC) -
I know it was an automated message and I'm basically talking to myself, but the fragmented nature of these conversations has bugged me from the start. I think I'll keep this as a reminder in case I want to use it in the future! Natural Cut ( talk) 06:25, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thanks for your thoughtful comments on Napoleon, am working on them. in this edit [1] you incorrectly removed a lot of spaces between words and linked words e.g. of due process. any ideas why? Tom B ( talk) 18:31, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
i think i've dealt with all the peer review points, Tom B ( talk) 21:35, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
yes, i only really use wiked for find and replace as it takes up quite a bit of memory and is more complicated, though perhaps i should try and see make better use of its functionality. as you say, good practice to look at other peer reviews to pick up tips and diligent. Tom B ( talk) 11:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thanks for helping me bust vandals using Huggle. - down load | sign! 00:27, 17 February 2009 (UTC) |
The Che 'Beret'star | ||
In recognition of your excellent proof reading, editing, and suggestions on Che (film) per peer review. These sorts of selfless time commitments are truly what makes Wikipedia flourish as an excellent learning resource. In appreciation, Redthoreau ( talk)RT 03:13, 19 February 2009 (UTC) |
down load's special barnstar | ||
Thanks for reverting the recent vandalism to my talk page! - down load | sign! 05:40, 26 February 2009 (UTC) |
I think you should not censor my own userpage. I believe policies do not give you the freedom to do that, except under narrow circumstances. If I call censorship censorship, this is an expression of free speech. 70.137.184.193 ( talk) 08:59, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, no problem. What in hell are lolwuts (I am old fart in the 60's) What spam is I know, its both what you get in the email and the mystery meat I eat fried with eggs. 70.137.184.193 ( talk) 09:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC) 70.137.184.193 ( talk) 09:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
re getting an account. As far as I understand anonymous edits are perfectly legitimate. I noticed recently a new fad, where every 2nd edit of mine was reverted by terror hunters, then I had to explain why its not vandalism, then I could reinstate it. Why did that work previously? Why this terror hysteria now? Just like with Bush! Are you attracting too many wannabe vandal hunter militia and vandals, and too few real contributors? I would not be surprised, such exchange as I had it recently is going to piss contributors off. 70.137.184.193 ( talk) 14:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your peer review of Zaprešić. I've posted replies to your post on the review page, so drop me a note if you want to provide further comments. Admiral Norton ( talk) 19:39, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
My edits to the Alec Baldwin page have not been vandalism or unconstructive. Following the information given to me by yourself, I reverted the edit and included my reasoning. There is no need to use the sandbox, because I am not suggesting a radical change, just adding some simple information. 68.194.199.112 ( talk) 02:33, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Please explain why you reverted my nomination for speedy deletion? The article was created by somebody as a joke. No person called 'Dan Quail' exists - the correct spelling and page is 'Dan Quayle'. I assume we are both refering to the former US vide-president here? How can you possibly revert this?-- 217.203.131.7 ( talk) 23:03, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm glad you've noticed my work. A few of my Wiki friends have already copy-edited History of the Han Dynasty, but not much copy-edit attention has been given to my other Han Dynasty articles of late:
I'm working on Government of the Han Dynasty in one of my sandboxes right now. I'm already familiar with Anti-Qing sentiment, but haven't viewed the article in a while. I'll take another look sooner or later and see where I can help.-- Pericles of Athens Talk 19:56, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Yo thanks for the revert on my talk page. Appreciated. I'd be happy to critique any articles you want reviewed. Thanks again! -- Riotrocket8676 You gotta problem with that? 02:35, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hey! Based on your edits to NationStates, I thought maybe you would be interested that I started a series of userboxes for the game. Feel free to add any or add your own!- 🐦Do☭torWho42 ( ⭐) 05:56, 16 December 2017 (UTC)