Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1989 South Florida television affiliation switch you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna ( talk) 04:20, 10 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article WVIZ you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Adog -- Adog ( talk) 16:22, 14 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article WCLV you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Adog -- Adog ( talk) 01:23, 15 August 2023 (UTC) reply

The article WVIZ you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:WVIZ for comments about the article, and Talk:WVIZ/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Adog -- Adog ( talk) 20:43, 15 August 2023 (UTC) reply

The article WCLV you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:WCLV for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Adog -- Adog ( talk) 16:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC) reply

The article 1989 South Florida television affiliation switch you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1989 South Florida television affiliation switch for comments about the article, and Talk:1989 South Florida television affiliation switch/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna ( talk) 06:23, 24 August 2023 (UTC) reply

The source you keep using is an observation, not a confirmation. What part of that is confusing? I have replaced that site with a official confirmation from the horse's mouth. Do not add articles observing changes in the TV landscape again! TheCatLife ( talk) 13:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC) reply

With all due respect, I wouldn't dignify that level of rhetoric with a response. But I used the closest thing to a reliable source out there (and the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is a reliable source, is it not? It was NOT a mere observation by a blogger but a newspaper writer merely stating the obvious from existing evidence on hand. Nathan Obral • he/him • t • c • 14:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Pronouns listed, opinion discarded. Don't bother talking to me again! TheCatLife ( talk) 14:48, 31 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Don't tell me how to conduct myself on this platform. Oops I talked to you anyway… :P Nathan Obral • he/him • t • c • 14:54, 31 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Courtesy link to corresponding ANI thread. 〜 Askarion ✉ 15:14, 31 August 2023 (UTC) reply