This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Thanks for putting in the request for Semi-Protection on Disney XD.-- Lamborghini man ( talk) 17:59, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

No problem, that page has always been trouble in the past. Momo san ^Gespräch 18:01, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

...For reverting that nonsense on my talk page. - Jeffrey Mall | Talk2Me | BNosey - 20:18, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi Momusufan, Thanks for your post, but please note that I made 2 edits within 36 hours and not 3 in 24. The anon user keeps on adding emphasis to info already added to the article and has done it again, despite your warning. I would like to request 2 things from you:

1. Please delete the erroneous warning from my talk page. 2. If you're an admin, please block the anon user or protect the page. I will put a request right now, as I did in the past when this user or 1 of his friends tried the same trick.

Thanks, Happy138 ( talk) 22:49, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Not giving context unless you want me to. You're an experienced editor, so I assume you just got caught up in it. Hope you took my advice in the right spirit. Cheers, tedder ( talk) 23:57, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Yeah I pretty much did. I'll remember to ignore such vandals from now on. Momo san ^Gespräch 23:59, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi Momusufan! I have started a discussion at the talk page regarding the Kuala Lumpur/Subang dispute. Your comments are greatly appreciated. Thanks! Charmedaddict ( talk) 03:56, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for helping protect my homepage from Hermanthegerman66's vandalism - take care... Dinkytown ( talk) 23:56, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Please explain why I have been tagged as a possible sock of User:ECW500 This maes no sense whatsoever. I was the one who tried to place the tag on a clear sock, after ANOTHER user had REMOVED it. I queried this at the relevant page, and then YOU removed my query, and tagged me! Also you warned me for vandalism, although I don't believe I have vandalized anything. Any explanation would be very welcome. Thank you. Maxx Mountain Rock ( talk) 18:44, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

If you wish to defend yourself, you will have to go to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/ECW500 to prove your side of the story. Momo san ^Gespräch 18:46, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

What exactly is the story? Could you please explain how you could possibly come to the conclusion that I may be this vandal? It makes no sense whatsoever. Check my edits and you will see that I was the who TAGGED that sock, and then questioned when ANOTHER USER REMOVED the tag. What could possibly make you think that I was the vandal? Also, please explain why it was perfectly fine in your book for this other editor to REMOVE SOCKPUPPET TAGS, yet when I removed the one from my page(with no real explanation for it being there) it is vandalism? Maxx Mountain Rock ( talk) 18:52, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Let the SPI case run it's course, I have no further comment on the issue. Momo san ^Gespräch 18:53, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

You have no further comment? You had no FIRST comment. Also YOU were the one who REMOVED my entry on the AIV page without explanation. I have not done anything wrong. How can my reporting a possible vandal be vandalism itself? Maxx Mountain Rock ( talk) 18:54, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Then speak to admin User_talk:J.delanoy about it since he reverted it last. Momo san ^Gespräch 18:56, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

But how exactly does that make you think that I was a sock? If I have made some big cock-up, fine. I STILL don't knwow hy that tag was removed. If I was mistaken(don't know how) in reinstating it, then say why. That doesn't mean that i am the vandal, does it? Maxx Mountain Rock ( talk) 19:01, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Explain how a new user account created 10 days ago would know where to go and post sockpuppet tags on the right pages? Thats a possible red flag here. Momo san ^Gespräch 19:03, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

I have been a Wrestlecrap fan since 2000. I noticed about 18 months ago that some idiot kept vandalizing the article, as well as RD Reynolds. I followed people's links/edits, and saw how it all worked. I wanted to ask a qusetion on the Wrestlecrap discussion page, so created an account. Also, I (perversely I admit) kept a check a on User:ECW500 socks, and remembered seeing that one day it was a lower number than a while before. I can be accused of being a lurker or a sad loser but now a sock. Maxx Mountain Rock ( talk) 19:07, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for responding to my vandalism report concerning User:65.103.28.57. While I realize that IP addresses are sometimes shared, the tone and content of the edits to the Rod Blagojevich article and the two instances of harassing notes left on my UserPage lead me to believe that the same person was at fault, which is what prompted my report to AIV. -- TommyBoy ( talk) 19:26, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

User_talk:Toddst1 removed the report because the IP address has not been recently warned enough to warrant a block. Re-report the IP at WP:AIV if it vandalises again. Momo san ^Gespräch 19:30, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification, I will send my above comments to him.-- TommyBoy ( talk) 19:50, 7 August 2009 (UTC)