Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
Hello Miniapolis. For the sake of transparency, one of the articles I copyedited for the March drive was recently deleted via expired PROD. The article was Diana Nyago. I don't know the rules on this, but if you have to subtract the word count I am fine with that. Thanks for helping to organise the drive; I had a lot of fun, and am considering joining the next one. All the best, Schminnte ( talk • contribs) 21:17, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Ahimsa in Jainism has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke ( talk) 14:28, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Hey, Miniapolis. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the
Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! interstate five 00:00, 24 April 2023 (UTC) |
![]() |
![]() | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Miniapolis! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:35, 24 April 2023 (UTC) |
![]() |
Hi Miniapolis,
Firstly happy first edit day!
I've recently contributed to the PSSD article by adding multiple tertiary sources from governmental medicines bodies (HealthCanada, HongKong regulators, NHS) and different reference textbooks such as DSM-5 and BNF , but they've been getting deleted repeatedly since this edit, any attempt to bring them back also results in reverts from the same user. Majority of primary sources have been removed yet
The user mentions excessive quotes being the reason for removing whole section, after being asked on why they didn't only remove the offending quotes in case they were problematic they've changed the argument now to the sources being against WP:UNDUE and them being original research.
Some might say instead of looking at the policies and figuring out what to keep on the page, someone's made their mind up on removing that whole section through throwing random policies at it until that section and possibly the whole article is deleted.
What should I do?
Talk:Post-SSRI sexual dysfunction#Sourcing concerns
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine#Post-SSRI sexual dysfunction—major issues with original research and non-MEDRS sources FallingPineapple ( talk) 15:39, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
Thank you very much for your thorough and skilled copyedit on the Arab–Khazar wars article! The result far exceeds my expectations. Cheers, Constantine ✍ 08:30, 30 April 2023 (UTC) |