![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | → | Archive 30 |
Hi,
I recived a few days ago messages from you about my changes to Arctic SA page ( /info/en/?search=Arctic_S.A.):
Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Arctic S.A. with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStar☆talk 07:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Arctic S.A.. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆talk 07:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Arctic S.A. with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —MelbourneStar☆talk 07:40, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
I want to update information because I am involved in Arctic activity and I guarantee this information are updated and accurate about the company. Can you please help me to make this changes and tell me what are the steps?
Best regards, Adrian — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrian bucuresti ( talk • contribs) 11:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
I recived a few days ago messages from you about my changes to Arctic SA page ( /info/en/?search=Arctic_S.A.):
Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Arctic S.A. with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStar☆talk 07:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Arctic S.A.. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆talk 07:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Arctic S.A. with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —MelbourneStar☆talk 07:40, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
I want to update information because I am involved in Arctic activity and I guarantee this information are updated and accurate about the company. Can you please help me to make this changes and tell me what are the steps? Best regards, Adrian Adrian bucuresti ( talk) 11:07, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Netflix and chill is a massive thing in pop culture at the moment do you not agree? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.171.163.158 ( talk) 00:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
I hope to be able to help with Australian writer information. I have a particular problem with the biographical information of the wikipedia subject "Tara June Winch" The entire bio needs re-writing the problem is just that half the information is incorrect.
Australianauthors (
talk) 13:36, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Greetings. I just stumbled across the damage this silly vandal has been spreading across WP for years: 216.234.53.243
You threatened action in June 2015. Please follow through and do something! I will try to repair the Population article, but I don't have the energy to try to track down all of the damage they have done and reverse it...- 71.174.188.32 ( talk) 19:37, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
I received an email from melbourne star regarding an article on Gangwar caste , Now this time i have again edited it and i have also mentioned the source of my knowledge , and one very important thing we know gangwar is a obc caste bt my friend obc status is given on the basis of economic condition take example of yadava's, but originally gangwar is a kshatriya clan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.236.49.57 ( talk) 15:36, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
This time i have again edited the article on Gangwar and i have also mentioned the source of my knowledge , we all know gangwar is a obc caste but my friend obc quota is given on the basis of economic condition not on the basis of lower caste take example of yadav's they are also obc caste but they are not lower caste , If u will read my source of my knowledge u will agree with it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.236.49.57 ( talk) 15:40, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello MelbourneStar: Enjoy the holiday season and upcoming winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, North America 1000 19:31, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
|
Thanks for all your help on the 'pedia!
|
How about you using your head a little bit? Clarification is not needed. Everyone I spoke to knows Sydney as the city, the state capital and not the Downtown area. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.154.89.30 ( talk) 14:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Julia Gillard, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stephen Smith and George Bush. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:26, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi MelbourneStar,
The incident that took place at Melbourne Airport is significant in the sense that one of the Government ministers got directly involved in an action conducted by airport security. The story was reported by several newspapers in Australia and abroad. The power to investigate acts done or omitted by authority with respect to matter of administration is not, if I am not mistaken, one given to any minister. For this reason, it appears that some of the Government members wrongly took actions, which resulted in the suspension of security staff. Hence, as the discomfort felt by Ms Bishop for being subjected to security screening is the origin of the Ministry's intervention, it is absolutely relevant that reports of the incident would be found on her page. I would appreciate if you could stop deleting it as it is not trivial when it comes to the respect of administrative authority by government members, an essential element of any functional state. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.234.159.65 ( talk) 09:36, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MelbourneStar reported by User:212.234.159.65 (Result: ). You may respond there if you wish. EdJohnston ( talk) 20:50, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
MelbourneStar,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:12, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
MelbourneStar,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. –
Davey2010
Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 11:17, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Visited the Gillard page for the first time in a while and it's much improved thanks to you. I can't believe how well it has been fleshed out. Hollth ( talk) 10:25, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Dear MelbourneStar,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--
FWiW Bzuk (
talk)
This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").
Received a message from you saying i edited Ivan Milats wiki page, i have no recollection of this, i saw that the edit was "he farted then shit on a bench", anyway i wasn't even logged in to Wikipedia so i don't know how you sent me a message. If you're 100% sure it came from this computer then i apologise, for either a friend must of done it or i did it a very long time ago, anyway thanks for making the edit. Actually now seeing that it was in may, no i didnt do it.
![]() |
The 78.26 RFA Appreciation award |
Thank you for the participation and support at my RFA. It is truly appreciated. I hope to be of further help around here, and if you see me doing something dumb, you know where to find me. Again, I thank you. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 24:42, 23 December 2015 (UTC) |
The edit's I made on the Hillary Clinton Email Controversy page, was not defamatory or speculation. I clearly cited my sources, and while she has not yet gone to court, this is what she is being accused of, and these are the laws she may or may not have broken. I am not a vandal, and trying to censor the truth is wrong. I don't care whether you feel she is guilty or not, this is what she is accused of. Innocent until guilty am I right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekiph ( talk • contribs) 23:34, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Julia Gillard you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Fremantle99 --
Fremantle99 (
talk) 05:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I got your message regarding safe deposit boxes, which is the correct term. The misuse of safety deposit boxes comes from people mishearing safe deposit ...when run together, it sounds like safedeposit, but the brain will reconstruct to safety deposit. A safe deposit box is a deposit box kept in a safe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.156.226.197 ( talk) 03:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
So this is about 5 years late, but I just saw your message [ [1]] here. In NYC the difference between an ADA and an Assistant Corporation Counsel is simply that an ADA prosecutes criminal cases, and Corporation Counsel handles civil cases involving the City of New York. Tufflaw ( talk) 19:49, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
I've created a discussion at Template talk:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016#Image. Please don't change the image until a consensus is reached. MB298 ( talk) 01:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Sorry. I didn't mean to insult other editors, I just wanted to inform them that Wikipedia is not censored. There can be swear words throughout the encyclopedia, but they will not be removed unless they are irrelevant to the article. I was a bit too self-demonstrating of swear words in my summary. However, my edit was good-mannered. Zakawer ( talk) 17:09, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Oh, and I was not trying to insult the editor, I was trying to explain that editors shouldn't censor swear words on Wikipedia. Therefore, I became too self-demonstrating in my summary, if not too insulting, man.
Zakawer (
talk) 09:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
You have left a message for my ip address. I read Wikipedia frequently. I don't edit Wikipedia and have no idea what you are talking about. So feel free to block my editing privileges as you say you will as long as I can continue to read Wikipedia. Thanks. The ip address your note was addressed to was 58.111.177.23. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.111.177.23 ( talk • contribs)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daniel Zovatto, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stephen Graham and Season one. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:55, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Julia Gillard you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Montanabw --
Montanabw (
talk) 07:20, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
The article
Julia Gillard you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Julia Gillard for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Montanabw --
Montanabw (
talk) 18:01, 21 May 2016 (UTC)