Welcome to Wikipedia, Me12356! Thank you for
your contributions. I am
Ocaasi and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on
my talk page. You can also check out
Wikipedia:Questions or type {{
helpme}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Ocaasi t | c 14:00, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
When you are editing a page, there should be an icon at the top of the page that says "Embed File." Before using this, you most upload a picture to use (See Picture Help for more information). If you need more assistance, please leave me a message on my talk page.
AbigailAbernathy ( talk) 14:37, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Renault F1, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
{{
helpme}}
" on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help. Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Renault F1, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
GrayFullbuster (
talk) 13:26, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Renault F1, you may be
blocked from editing.
GrayFullbuster (
talk) 13:30, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
When you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. Britmax ( talk) 13:43, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Me12356. In case you hadn't noticed, new articles ( Caterham F1, Lotus F1 and Marussia F1) and templates ({{ Caterham F1}}, {{ Lotus F1}} and {{ Marussia F1}}) have been created to cover the activities of these teams from 2012 onwards. So the old articles ( Team Lotus (2011), Renault F1 and Virgin Racing) and templates ({{ Lotus Racing}}, {{ Renault F1}} and {{ Virgin Racing}}) now only cover the period up to 2011, and so should contain the "old" names. Regards. DH85868993 ( talk) 21:51, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi there Me1235, I happened to notice you have made a number of small changes to team templates recently. Some of these that have changed text or background colours (such as this previous one for Renault's template [1]) have made the team name less readable, and hence have been reverted. Please try and use the preview function before saving your edit, to see whether the change has a positive effect. Also, if you would leave an edit summary to explain your reasons for any changes if would be helpful. Thank you QueenCake ( talk) 14:20, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Renault sport f1 logo plus title.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Pyrop e 14:53, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lotus logo2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Pyrop e 14:54, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Team Logos 2.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Pyrop e 14:55, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Team history.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Pyrop e 14:55, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Me12356, a number of editors have expressed concern regarding your adjustments to this navbox and your plastering it all over pages that are only peripherally related to the navbox subject. Right now you appear to be trying to hammer a square peg into a round hold, despite the fact that people are already pointing out that it won't go. Following the principles of WP:BRD you really ought to discuss the matter, as you have been asked to do, rather than engage in an edit war. Pyrop e 15:30, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Please cease re-adding navboxes to articles after having been reverted. Either discuss the additions and try and establish consensus for a change, or prepare to be blocked for edit-warring. Consider this a warning. Thank you QueenCake ( talk) 16:41, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. You might have noticed that a lot of your recent edits are getting reverted, by myself and others. Mostly these are because your changes are either unhelpful (for example, in that you are simplifying things that shouldn't be simplified) or are altering pages to show incorrect or irrelevant information. One of the major aspects of Wikipedia is the editing community. There are plenty of editors who have been here for many years, who form a large group of experienced and knowledgeable people who interact to improve and maintain the Wikipedia pages. If you are serious about helping to contribute to Wikipedia in a constructive and useful way it would probably be a good idea to start asking some questions of such folk. Questions such as "why is this happening?", "why are my edits considered not helpful?", and so on. You can leave messages on an individual editor's page as described in the welcome message at the top of this page, or you can go to group discussion boards (such as the one at WP:F1) and ask questions of the community as a whole. Hope to see you there. Pyrop e 20:14, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A clear face picture of Nelson Piquet S.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster ( talk) 23:08, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
The F1 navboxes are, as many people have already pointed out to you, supposed to facilitate navigation throughout a team's history. Titling them with sponsor names or with unrepresentative modern monikers just isn't helpful. Pyrop e 11:54, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:HRT F1 Team Motorhome 2010.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.motorsport.com/#!/f1/photo/main-gallery/hispania/?i=48350&id=989055&s=2. As a copyright violation, File:HRT F1 Team Motorhome 2010.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:HRT F1 Team Motorhome 2010.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Pyrop e 11:51, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Renault F1 Team Motorhome 2010.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.motorsport.com/#!/f1/photo/main-gallery/renault-f1-134/?i=48357&id=989048&s=2. As a copyright violation, File:Renault F1 Team Motorhome 2010.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Renault F1 Team Motorhome 2010.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Pyrop e 11:52, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you upload a media file with false or missing copyright or source information, as you did at
File:HRT F1 Team Motorhome 2010.jpg, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. These images are quite clearly copyright. The notice is very clear at the bottom of the page. The images themselves are prominently watermarked. The terms of use state explicitly that none of the website's content is to be reused for any purpose. Your assertion of free use is therefore plainly a bare-faced lie, and so their uploading is considered deliberate vandalism. You have previous form in this issue, so stop.
Pyrop
e 11:44, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
You seem to be trying to add a section to the infobox on the above article. Unfortunately, the infobox does not support this addition which therefore does not show. Using "Show Review" button, in the line of buttons at the bottom of ther edit screen next to "save" before saving would tell you this Britmax ( talk) 10:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Well my opinion is no, a mention in the text is enough. But I was just letting you know that the infobox does not currently support such an addition. Britmax ( talk) 11:14, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Peripitus
(Talk) 10:42, 6 July 2012 (UTC)Me12356 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The Site i got the image from allowed you to use the images as the images where free for public uses the reason you blocked me was unfair
Decline reason:
See below. If you're unsure about copyrights, don't upload images. When in doubt, ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Max Semenik ( talk) 12:35, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an
edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! —
JonC
ॐ 10:58, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Me12356. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to
make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. —
DoRD (
talk) 17:04, 14 August 2012 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The file File:Curtis F1 Logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Willy1018 (
talk) 07:48, 4 January 2019 (UTC)